User talk:Miradre: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 438922693 by Mathsci (talk) SPI first please
2over0 (talk | contribs)
→‎Topic ban: R&I: new section
Line 14: Line 14:


:See what I mean? [[Special:Contributions/212.183.140.7|212.183.140.7]] ([[User talk:212.183.140.7|talk]]) 15:24, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
:See what I mean? [[Special:Contributions/212.183.140.7|212.183.140.7]] ([[User talk:212.183.140.7|talk]]) 15:24, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

== Topic ban: R&I ==

Per [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race and intelligence#Discretionary sanctions]] and discussion at [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&oldid=438967259#User:Miradre_reported_by_User:Aprock_.28Result:_3_month_topic_ban.29 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Miradre reported by User:Aprock (Result: topic ban)], please do not make any edits to the articles covered by [[WP:ARBR&I]], broadly construed, for the next three months (2011-10-11). - [[User talk:2over0|2/0]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/2over0|cont.]])</small> 20:12, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:12, 11 July 2011

/Archive 1 /Archive 2 /Archive 3

Notification of WP:AN/EW report

Hello Miradre,

This is an automated friendly notification to inform you that you have been reported for Violation of the Edit warring policy at the Administrators' noticeboard.
If you feel that this report has been made in error, please reply as soon as possible on the noticeboard. However, before contesting an Edit warring report, please review the respective policies to ensure you are not in violation of them. ~ NekoBot (MeowTalk) 05:58, 11 July 2011 (UTC) (False positive? Report it!)[reply]

Advice

You need to know that you are not going to win this. Arbcomm has decided to favor a particular line on R&I and denote all other lines as being racist. Promoting the unfavored line thus becomes a matter of conduct not content, and so reasoned argument is beside the point. There are a number of editors whose addiction to wiki-drama is tolerated in order to enforce the party line. Sooner or later you will do, or be provoked into, something which can be construed as contrary to policy and hence you can be sanctioned without further ado. Once you are associated with a banned user, you will be reverted on sight. So much easier than discussing the nuances of these complex and controversial matters. 212.183.140.7 (talk) 08:33, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See what I mean? 212.183.140.7 (talk) 15:24, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban: R&I

Per Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race and intelligence#Discretionary sanctions and discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Miradre reported by User:Aprock (Result: topic ban), please do not make any edits to the articles covered by WP:ARBR&I, broadly construed, for the next three months (2011-10-11). - 2/0 (cont.) 20:12, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]