Talk:MythBusters: Difference between revisions
m →"such as Florida so do some alligator experiments": Issue fixed. |
→Contraversy: Yes, I Can. |
||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
The question is, ¿how does this controversy apply? ¿How do we address this? A REDDSON |
The question is, ¿how does this controversy apply? ¿How do we address this? A REDDSON |
||
:If you have [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] which point these issues out then create a new section titled ''Criticisms'' and just make sure you cite what you list there.<br/><span style="text-shadow:#294 0.1em 0.1em 0.3em; class=texhtml">[[User:Berean Hunter|<font face="High Tower Text" size="1px"><b style="color:#00C">⋙–Ber</b><b style="color:#66f">ean–Hun</b><b style="color:#00C">ter—►</b></font>]]</span> 00:15, 19 August 2011 (UTC) |
:If you have [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] which point these issues out then create a new section titled ''Criticisms'' and just make sure you cite what you list there.<br/><span style="text-shadow:#294 0.1em 0.1em 0.3em; class=texhtml">[[User:Berean Hunter|<font face="High Tower Text" size="1px"><b style="color:#00C">⋙–Ber</b><b style="color:#66f">ean–Hun</b><b style="color:#00C">ter—►</b></font>]]</span> 00:15, 19 August 2011 (UTC) |
||
::¿Do you just go through my contribs list to harass me? At any rate, my source is Time Life Books “Fighting Sail” (The Seafarers series), chapter 2 as I recall. In this document, they list chain shot and how it is used (as anti-rigging/mast ammo, to disable an enemy vsl), whereas these “scientists” used it against a pig in an anti-personnel capacity. Had they used it in the intended fashion they would have found the myth proven. A REDDSON |
Revision as of 06:16, 6 September 2011
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the MythBusters article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 100 days |
MythBusters received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page is not a forum for general discussion about MythBusters. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about MythBusters at the Reference desk. |
Producer Wikipedia Page
How come that the producer Peter Rees doesn't have his own Wikipedia page, but a link to IMBD? Just wondering. Finfun (talk)
Citation 49 doesnt work
^^ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.151.108.186 (talk) 12:11, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Here's what looks to be a Chinese language version http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QG5mwaVYwp0 (at the the video matches the description of Jamie wearing armour in front on the paintball thing) 131.217.6.7 (talk) 02:27, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Inconclusive
It says that the myths can be busted, plausible, or confirmed. But if they don't have the technology or resources to successfully test the myth they call it inconclusive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.212.194.29 (talk) 01:00, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
RFID controversy
Anyone care to add something about it? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDcuDFSVgMU — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.60.175.214 (talk) 21:16, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
"such as Florida so do some alligator experiments"
English is not my native language so please forgive me if I'm wrong, but shouldn't that be "Florida to do some..." ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.176.219.24 (talk) 11:29, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- Fixed by AussieLegend August 18, 2011. Nutster (talk) 19:25, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Contraversy
MythBusters has been accused of rigging experiments, either intentionally or by ignorance, to arrive at desired results rather than actual results; Amongst the most pointed of these was “Pirate Ammo”, in which chains and silverware were fired out a non-naval cannon in what they called a “busted myth” when, in fact, had they been used in the manor intended (and preferably out of a naval gun) they would have worked.
The question is, ¿how does this controversy apply? ¿How do we address this? A REDDSON
- If you have reliable sources which point these issues out then create a new section titled Criticisms and just make sure you cite what you list there.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 00:15, 19 August 2011 (UTC)- ¿Do you just go through my contribs list to harass me? At any rate, my source is Time Life Books “Fighting Sail” (The Seafarers series), chapter 2 as I recall. In this document, they list chain shot and how it is used (as anti-rigging/mast ammo, to disable an enemy vsl), whereas these “scientists” used it against a pig in an anti-personnel capacity. Had they used it in the intended fashion they would have found the myth proven. A REDDSON
- Old requests for peer review
- B-Class television articles
- Mid-importance television articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- B-Class American television articles
- Mid-importance American television articles
- American television task force articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- B-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- B-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
- Mid-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
- San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- B-Class Skepticism articles
- High-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles