User talk:Fortheloveofbacon/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎January 2012: unblock on hold for ArbCom review
Hersfold (talk | contribs)
→‎January 2012: unblocked
Line 82: Line 82:
}}
}}


{{Unblock on hold | 1=Elen of the Roads| 2=Please see my response here [[WP:Sockpuppet_investigations/ChildofMidnight]] and note that my defense was not addressed prior to this block. This is a witch hunt. Although it seems ridiculous to address, I would like to point out that the only overlap in my editing habits is one vandalism revert on the Doritos article. [[User:Fortheloveofbacon|Fortheloveofbacon]] ([[User talk:Fortheloveofbacon#top|talk]]) 23:16, 21 January 2012 (UTC) | 3=On hold pending review by the Arbitration Committee. [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] 00:46, 22 January 2012 (UTC)}}
{{Unblock reviewed| 1=Please see my response here [[WP:Sockpuppet_investigations/ChildofMidnight]] and note that my defense was not addressed prior to this block. This is a witch hunt. Although it seems ridiculous to address, I would like to point out that the only overlap in my editing habits is one vandalism revert on the Doritos article. [[User:Fortheloveofbacon|Fortheloveofbacon]] ([[User talk:Fortheloveofbacon#top|talk]]) 23:16, 21 January 2012 (UTC) | accept=This appears to have been a case of mistaken identity, based on a number of factors we were able to look into during the Arbitration Committee review, which would not have been available during the SPI investigation. I have unblocked you and apologize for the confusion here. Happy editing. [[User:Hersfold|'''''<em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue">Hers</em><em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:gold">fold</em>''''']] <sup>([[User:Hersfold/t|t]]/[[User:Hersfold/a|a]]/[[Special:Contributions/Hersfold|c]])</sup> 01:10, 22 January 2012 (UTC)}}


Can you please explain {{User|RelevantUsername}}, which you created earlier today? --[[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 23:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Can you please explain {{User|RelevantUsername}}, which you created earlier today? --[[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 23:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:10, 22 January 2012

Welcome and introduction

Hi, Fortheloveofbacon. This is NOT some automated message...it's from a real person. You can talk to me right now. Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you've just joined, and wanted to give you a few tips to get you started. If you have any questions, please talk to us. The tips below should help you to get started. Best of luck!  Chzz  ►  11:54, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ようこそ
  • You don't need to read anything - anybody can edit; just go to an article and edit it. Be Bold, but please don't put silly stuff in - it will be removed very quickly, and will annoy people.
  • Ask for help. Talk to us live, or edit this page, put {{helpme}} and describe what help you need. Someone will reply very quickly - usually within a few minutes.
  • Edit existing articles, before you make your own. Look at some subjects that you know about, and see if you can make them a bit better. For example, Wikipedia:Cleanup#2009.
  • When you're ready, read about Your first article. It should be about something well-known, and it will need references.

Good luck with editing; please drop me a line some time on my own talk page.

There's lots of information below. Once again, welcome to the fantastic world of Wikipedia!

--  Chzz  ►  11:54, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles

Hiya :)

Hi there :) not spok for a while :) did you get your iPhone back? Sophie (Talk) 07:37, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ChildofMidnight. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 15:45, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Fortheloveofbacon (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please see my response here WP:Sockpuppet_investigations/ChildofMidnight and note that my defense was not addressed prior to this block. This is a witch hunt. Although it seems ridiculous to address, I would like to point out that the only overlap in my editing habits is one vandalism revert on the Doritos article. Fortheloveofbacon (talk) 23:16, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

This appears to have been a case of mistaken identity, based on a number of factors we were able to look into during the Arbitration Committee review, which would not have been available during the SPI investigation. I have unblocked you and apologize for the confusion here. Happy editing. Hersfold (t/a/c) 01:10, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain RelevantUsername (talk · contribs), which you created earlier today? --MuZemike 23:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CLEANSTART Frankly, I assumed when I woke up for the day that this issue would be over and done with. I guess the admins are all vegetarians? I did not think that the word "bacon" was enough for WP:DUCK, and assumed that when I came back to the wiki today, I'd be able to get on with things... Should be noted that arbcom has also been notified.Fortheloveofbacon (talk) 23:43, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]