Jump to content

User talk:Kirill Lokshin: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Balloonman (talk | contribs)
m →‎[[Military brat]]: just noticed that you prefer to resond on my talk page.
Line 78: Line 78:
==[[Military brat]]==
==[[Military brat]]==
Greetings I tried to add Military brat to the military peer review process, and it is not showing up on the list of items requesting peer review. I'm not sure if I requested it properly, but you look like you are active over there and thought you might be able to help me out. Thanks[[User:Balloonman|Balloonman]] 08:52, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Greetings I tried to add Military brat to the military peer review process, and it is not showing up on the list of items requesting peer review. I'm not sure if I requested it properly, but you look like you are active over there and thought you might be able to help me out. Thanks[[User:Balloonman|Balloonman]] 08:52, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

== [[Talk:Polish Expedition to Kiev]] ==

Your comments are welcome. --<font color="FC4339">[[User:Ghirlandajo|Ghirla]]</font> <sup><font color="C98726">[[User_talk:Ghirlandajo|-трёп-]]</font></sup> 13:29, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:29, 20 November 2006

User:Kirill Lokshin/Notice

  • Please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) and add comments on a new topic in a new section.
  • I will respond on your talk page unless you request otherwise.
  • Questions, requests, criticism, and any other comments are always welcome!

Archives

June 2005–June 2006
June 2006–

Threads older than five days are automatically archived by Werdnabot.

Mil refs

Could you ask a knowledgeable person to add needed refs at Robert Baden-Powell, 1st Baron Baden-Powell, see Wikipedia:Good_articles/Disputes#Robert_Baden-Powell.2C_1st_Baron_Baden-Powell. Rlevse 03:50, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ERcheck found some for me.!Rlevse 11:39, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

State-level National Guard units

SSG Cornelius Seon and I have done some work to create an initial pseudo-template for a state Army National Guard unit. The Alabama Army National Guard article is, for now, our model, such as it is.

My question for you is: Is there some wikipedia-magic we should consider doing in order to keep some of the boilerplate, the stuff that will need to be on every one of the fifty state Army Guard pages, up-to-date and the same on each of these 50 pages? I suspect there is. But I don't know how to do such things. If you know of a mil-project editor who is good at this stuff and might like to help out with some cool technique for keeping the standard stuff on these pages looking good, please have them look at the Alabama Army National Guard page. Maybe they could help us make a first cut at it before we grow it to 49 other pages. Mvialt 07:38, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for your advice Kirill. Since that is the recommended WP approach, I will use the copy-and-paste technique to create additional state-level NG units. Mvialt 13:54, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Task Force Proposals

Hey Kirill,

I have two task force proposals I've been thinking about for a while but haven't really had the guts to submit. I was wondering if the Military History project could add a project for the Military History of Egypt and for Space Warfare. Both are pretty notable, as Egypt has one of the longest and most well-documented military histories ever, and space warfare is likely to become a major component of warfare in the future (although space is already greatly used in modern-day warfare in the field of communications).


Hope my ideas aren't completely ridiculous. Sharkface217 21:09, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I completely understand. Egypt is covered generally, and Space Warfare is too theoretical right now. Eventually, there probably will be a Space Warfare (if when man moves past Earth and into the great beyond, war will inevitably follow) task force. Just not yet. Sharkface217 21:57, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I will be sure to join both if and when they are formed, assuming it is within my lifetime.Sharkface217 22:28, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you have some time, I would greatly appreciate your participation at Portal talk:China. --Ideogram 04:06, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and took your advice...I wrote a nice fair use rationale and uploaded the picture. Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 04:14, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Improvements to the Psychology portal

Hi, I'm working on trying to get Portal:Psychology up to Featured portal status. Any tips you can offer on how to improve it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Rfrisbietalk 15:50, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation?

Any idea what the ass this is all about? Someone on Commons apparently noticed that "50yrs pma not enough on commons," even though Library and Archives Canada clearly says "copyright expired" and "no restrictions on access or on use for reproduction or publication." Am I missing something here? Albrecht 16:09, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, to clarify, I don't really care about the duplicate on Commons (which someone else uploaded from wiki); what worries me is that my original wiki version has for whatever reason been tagged for deletion as well. Albrecht 18:20, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Munich

Would you be interested in helping out atWikiProject Munich? Kingjeff 21:26, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to know anything. Remmeber there is no original research allowed. Maybe they is another way you could help. Are you good at assessing articles? Kingjeff 21:40, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think Munich has much of a militry history? Maybe you could contribute to both with Military history in Munich. Kingjeff 21:56, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AQu01rius

Kirill, this user is clearly not interested in working with me. He will not listen to my objections unless you agree with me, and he ignores my requests to slow down editing while we discuss my objections to changes he has already made. What do you think I should do? --Ideogram 18:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for advice

Kirill, I sent you an e-mail. I'd appreciate your thoughts. Thanks. — ERcheck (talk) 22:50, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

take a test

Wikipedia:Are_You_a_Wikipediholic_Test#How_often_you_use_Wikipedia. Just a quick test. I stopped above 750 and was not halfway through. Wandalstouring 00:16, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings I tried to add Military brat to the military peer review process, and it is not showing up on the list of items requesting peer review. I'm not sure if I requested it properly, but you look like you are active over there and thought you might be able to help me out. ThanksBalloonman 08:52, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments are welcome. --Ghirla -трёп- 13:29, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]