Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:51, 27 December 2007

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism/header

Alerts

Bot-reported

77.78.86.161 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: User is in the category: Shared IP addresses from educational institutions. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 07:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Lololollojihfu9dr (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 3 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user blanking articles, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
176.57.193.6 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 614 five times in the last 5 minutes (Memes and vandalism trends (moomer slang + zoomer slang), details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:12, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
82.62.202.168 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 30 five times in the last 5 minutes (Large deletion from article by new editors, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User-reported

Frank mad (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and I.P. 66.176.219.186 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) are the same person. Both users have contributed to the same articles, vandalizing them repeatedly by removing sourced information and pushing POV. This can be seen in their contributions page. The I.P. has just been blocked for 3 months but the user is now using their user account (Frank mad) to continue vandalizing. Edits pushing POV on White Latin American by deleting the exactly same information by Frank mad [1] and the I.P. [2] [3] are identical. This user will not communicate with other users who have tried to talk to them, including myself. This makes it hard to try to come to a mutual understanding, but in this case erasing info. is considered vandalism. The user and I.P. have been repeatedly warned and told to not remove the info; they still do so, and it is reverted, however, they come back hours later to do it again. I don't know what action should or can take place but this reverting every day has to come to an end. -- LaNicoya •Talk• LaNicoya (talk) 19:21, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Last warning November 19 - nothing much since then. Ian Cairns (talk) 19:31, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On the presumption that the user and the ip are the same then I think a 3 month block of the ip is a fairly unambigious warning not to continue disrupting the encyclopedia. LessHeard vanU (talk) 20:54, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 ::Comment: Last warning November 19 - nothing much since then. [[User:Icairns|Ian Cairns]] ([[User talk:Icairns|talk]]) 19:31, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
 :::On the presumption that the user and the ip are the same then I think a 3 month block of the ip is a fairly unambigious warning not to continue disrupting the encyclopedia. [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] ([[User talk:LessHeard vanU|talk]]) 20:54, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
-{{vandal|AdvisorOne}} I've had this page watched from the first revert. I'm beginning to believe that this guy is a vandalism-only account, it's hard to assume good faith when he's been given 12 warnings by 6 people for unexplained reversions with really bizaare edit summaries without explaining himself on the talk page and edit warring ''only'' on [[Jazmin Grace Grimaldi]] and a relevant removal on a different article. He is now on his second block. It's wierd because another editor, {{user|Lethiere}} was pulling the same stunts by reverting without good reason. But he eventually stopped after a few warnings. I don't think it's the same person, but I really don't want to make a likely false checkuser request either. This account should really be blocked indefinitely based on the circumstances. These are his only contributions mysteriously after Lethiere stopped only hours after Advisor stepped in. --[[User:Charitwo|Charitwo]] <sup>[[User talk:Charitwo|talk]]</sup> 21:50, 27 December 2007 (UTC)