User talk:BLGM5: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎White Russian: edits were not vandalism
BLGM5 (talk | contribs)
m Reverted 1 edit by GB fan identified as vandalism to last revision by SineBot. (TW)
Line 126: Line 126:


origin of 'white' and 'russian' http://www.bootsnall.com/articles/08-10/10-famous-cocktails-and-where-they-were-born.html <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Wikitian|Wikitian]] ([[User talk:Wikitian|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Wikitian|contribs]]) 17:03, 22 September 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
origin of 'white' and 'russian' http://www.bootsnall.com/articles/08-10/10-famous-cocktails-and-where-they-were-born.html <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Wikitian|Wikitian]] ([[User talk:Wikitian|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Wikitian|contribs]]) 17:03, 22 September 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:I suggest you go and read the definition of [[WP:Vandalism|vandalism]] here on Wikipedia. The edits the IP was making were not vandalism. They were good faith edits to improve the article and to discuss the changes they were making. '''[[User:GB fan|<span style='color: #ffac2c;background-color: #00422f;'>~~&nbsp;GB</span>]][[User talk:GB fan|<span style='color: #ffac2c;background-color: #00422f;'>&nbsp;fan&nbsp;~~</span>]]''' 18:00, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:41, 22 September 2010

Welcome!

Hello, BLGM5! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Closedmouth (talk) 18:07, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Regarding recent edits to Colin Cowherd

Please consider discussing this edit on the talk page, of the article, I reverted my revert for now, but you should discus this on the talk page, enjoy editing, and you are welcome MaenK.A.Talk 16:25, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

you didnt had to revert your message, its ok, I didnt pay attention to your edit summery at first :-) MaenK.A.Talk 16:27, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits at Logorama

Hi, I reverted your recent edit at Logorama. I'm not a fan of that list of brands either, but calling for reliable sources is not an appropriate reason to remove it. Please re-read WP:V. Sources are only required for contentious material, and for quotes. Uncontroversial material apparent to any viewer of the film in question does not need to be sourced. If you're disputing it because you think it's WRONG, that's another matter, but a lack of sources isn't a policy-supported reason to delete. Perhaps try attacking it on WP:TRIVIA grounds, I think there's still some leverage to be had there. - DustFormsWords (talk) 00:16, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, the tag you've just added seems like a reasonable compromise as we can probably all agree that the article in general could be better sourced. - DustFormsWords (talk) 00:29, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You're such a nice guy. Things like this endear you to people when you run for administrator! BLGM5 (talk) 00:30, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your AfD nomination of Ben Hansbrough was incomplete. If you wish to finish the nomination, please create the discussion page (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Hansbrough) and list your reasons for deletion there. Thank you. — Rankiri (talk) 15:49, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • You might want to provide your reasoning at the AFD. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 17:49, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, thought I was reverting the IP. Harry the Dog WOOF 12:31, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Motorola Droid - advertising language

Hi - I'd like to address both our concerns about the so-called "interactive experience" used as a marketing tool by Verizon in its release of this device. Please see the talk page. Thanks! Z.S. ......(talk) 18:15, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

Thank you very much for your contribution to my Rfa. I have made a comment about it at User talk:JamesBWatson#Your Request for Adminship which you are, of course, very welcome to read if you wish to. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:15, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tags like the ones you added need defending on the Talk Page. Something like {{plot}} or {{unreferenced}} are self-explanatory. Others need specific arguments for use. BLGM5 (talk) 12:43, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Or it can be explained in the edit summary, which is what I did. Erpert (let's talk about it) 20:41, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"Perhaps"? doesn't count. Good try though! BLGM5 (talk) 11:21, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: TtH

Hi BLGM5, you'll have to start a new AfD. The article as it is now is different to the version that was deleted in October 2006. I found the article while leafing through the deleted contributions of Conversion script, and just decided to undelete the old versions per the advice at this section of DRV. Graham87 02:48, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll start a new AfD, thanks for the input. BLGM5 (talk) 15:10, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Machete (film)

Hello. Letting you know, as I'm sure you know, you currently appear to be engaged in an edit war on the Machete (film) page. I suggest you stop, seek discussion on the talk page, otherwise you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Akerans (talk) 07:04, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Everclear

I have reverted your recent edit of Everclear (alcohol).

In future, please do not undertake mass reversions of this kind without discussing them first on the talk page. Doing so contravenes good editing practice and, in this case, WP:Popular culture as well. Wahrmund (talk) 19:04, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning your second reversion of this content. The citations are inherent in the entries themselves, which contain links that are primary sources for them. Furthermore, you have deleted a complete bibliographic citation of the book Lake Wobegon Days. Wahrmund (talk) 19:38, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

White Russian

Stop leaving warnings for me on my talk page and reverting my edits. Only unsourced contentious material or quotes should be removed from articles. This is neither plus the version you're reverting to is unsourced as well. 208.54.35.33 (talk) 20:21, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

origin of 'white' and 'russian' http://www.bootsnall.com/articles/08-10/10-famous-cocktails-and-where-they-were-born.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikitian (talkcontribs) 17:03, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]