User talk:69.250.146.100: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:05, 5 May 2011

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Ohio University has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Grafen (talk) 07:08, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Media Matters for America. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gobonobo ^T ^C 01:08, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 39 hours for being used by blocked user User:Ak169808.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Courcelles 04:00, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.250.146.100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I truly, nor will ever, fully understand you people. 69.250.146.100 (talk) 10:06 pm, Today (UTC−6)

Decline reason:

Sounds like a WP:COMPETENCE issue. - Vianello (Talk) 04:11, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Republican National Committee, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Republican National Committee was changed by 69.250.146.100 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.836387 on 2010-11-27T23:00:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:00, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Anal beads constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 03:12, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove all content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to User:Ak169808. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Pol430 (talk) 21:22, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Misunderstanding

Hello, User:Ak169808. You are a blocked user, which means you are not allowed to edit Wikipedia. You are welcome to read Wikipedia's articles, but you are no longer permitted to make edits, even if you log out. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:26, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Humans vs. Zombies, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Humans vs. Zombies was changed by 69.250.146.100 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.913499 on 2011-04-11T03:43:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:43, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. While you apparently disagree with the contents of the article on Dana Rohrabacher, section blanking can sometimes look like vandalism, and you should typically explain your reasons in the article's talk page and build consensus there before making such significant changes. However, I have not reverted your edits since there may be an issue under Biographies of Living Persons policy; if so, you should still explain the reasons behind your deletions. P T 02:26, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clarifying a misunderstanding

When you were blocked as User:Ak169808, it was you, the human being, who were blocked from using Wikipedia. It isn't acceptable to avoid that block by logging out, for the same reasons that, when your ex-wife changes the locks at your old house, you aren't allowed to come in by the windows. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 10:52, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me this a shared IP address. This is a student dorm house. 7 people different people live here every semester. FisherQueen Please read subscribed above.

Yes, I'm sure that this home is shared by various people. You, the one who can't resist using Wikipedia to promote your political view, are the one who is blocked- it's unfortunate if that has inconvenienced any of your roommates, but it doesn't look like any of them are anonymously editing Wikipedia. -User:FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:12, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:FisherQueen -Fuck it. I accepted my punishment, you are right.

hey User:FisherQueen I know I was upset before but the edits done by User:Markhoos to Dana Rohrabacher have actually been really great. Thanks for helping out!

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 :Yes, I'm sure that this home is shared by various people.  You, the one who can't resist using Wikipedia to promote your political view, are the one who is blocked- it's unfortunate if that has inconvenienced any of your roommates, but it doesn't look like any of them are anonymously editing Wikipedia. -[[User:FisherQueen]]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> ([[User talk:FisherQueen|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/FisherQueen|contribs]])</span> 00:12, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 [[User:FisherQueen]] -Fuck it. I accepted my punishment, you are right.
+hey [[User:FisherQueen]] I know I was upset before but the edits done by [[User:Markhoos]] to [[Dana Rohrabacher]] have actually been really great. Thanks for helping out!