Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 December 7

December 7

File:File; francis ngokumu jpg.JPG

File:File; francis ngokumu jpg.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Francis ngokumu (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:37, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
• Delete: Last remaining part of a confused collection of soccer-related articles which were deleted as a hoax. The author has been blocked after a trip to WP:ANI, and it's unlikely that this picture will ever be used in an article. Favonian (talk) 10:51, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Reassignment.jpg

File:Reassignment.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jb3 (notify | contribs).

• There is no Wikipedia or legal precedent for items entered into evidence or as court documents are relieved of their copyright. The image itself evidences a 1980 copyright of The Roman Catholic Diocese of Orange. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 01:29, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Indian freedom pie chart.jpg

File:Indian freedom pie chart.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fowler&fowler (notify | contribs).

• The image is both unencyclopedic + misleading. Complete WP:OR by uploader, and he counts number of refs in "text-books" - as described in file page and discussions. The OR image is used extensively in talk page discussions to mislead other editors, see various talk pages linking [1]. Also the author and an admin remove OR tag on an obvious OR, [2] and [3].Doorvery far (talk) 03:56, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Also listing file File:India freedom bar chart.jpg, which is nothing but same OR data, but in bar graph format. Doorvery far (talk) 03:58, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Abecedare (talk) 04:36, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

• Keep obviously, as both an archival record related to this RFC, and of continued value to point to new editors who want to push an unsourced and undue POV at the India featured article, as here. Expunging a survey of authoritative academic sources, because one doesn't like what they say is frankly disruptive. Note that the nominator has already argued his point at Talk:India, requested a 30, marked the images as OR, tried to have them speedy deleted, and having not gained consensus at any of those attempts has now nominated them for deletion. In the latest comment on the issue he decries the editors for "living in past referring to paper books", and offers to find web-sources instead (no, I am not making that up! :-) ) Abecedare (talk) 04:53, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

"Expunging a survey of authoritative academic sources" doesn't even properly mention how the author counted references to individual subjects/people. I have never seen anybody counting Cntr+F in a page/book and listing them, that is number of occurances(?), which i need to see done anywhere in world other than this image. On top of this he synthesised to get %s, than mentioning gandhi(21), INC(18) etc. as per bar graph. Number of occurrences of a topic signify nothing, and I have seen it nowhere else. Doorvery far (talk) 06:31, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

• Keep per Abecedare's logic. As a new editor, i find the image and the RFC between Reuben Iys and Fowler are highly educational. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sodabottle (talk • contribs)
• Keep Nomination is a very unambuiguous case of WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Summarising a count of references and compiling it into a chart for the purose of a long debate cannot be termed as OR. --Deepak D'Souza (talk) 11:29, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

How it is not termed OR? He himself counted references, compiled a report himself, and drew a graph that is one and only of its kind on earth. If not OR, show me some ref that shows similar graph. Doorvery far (talk) 14:16, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

• Keep The image is used for discussion purposes, not in the article itself. It was also used for the RfC and is part of the archival record. -SpacemanSpiff 17:17, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
• Keep Policies that apply to articles and sourcing don't always apply to discussion about the article and sources. WP:OR says (italics are mine) "Articles may not contain any new analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to advance a position not clearly advanced by the sources." Using this policy to attempt to stifle discussion goes against the spirit and letter of WP:OR. Since the images are part of a commonly referenced discussion, they are still important to the discussion and need to be kept. Priyanath ^talk 17:29, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

OR in article or in discussion are very close. The outcome of the discussion results in article content, hence OR is not allowed in disucssions too. Doorvery far (talk) 03:49, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

• Keep The chart is not included in an article and its primary use is to illustrate a point that is in use for determining consensus on what to include in the article. As a mere summary of references, it is identical to a textual description of that point (except that a picture is worth a thousand words!). Finally, the nominator appears to be trying to make a point, a bad idea overall. --RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 00:09, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

File:REBELS.gif

File:REBELS.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bradroenfeldt (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, no target article or encyc use given Skier Dude (talk) 07:51, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

File:DrRock.jpg

File:DrRock.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bradroenfeldt (notify | contribs).

• OR, unidentified subject Skier Dude (talk) 07:53, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

File:RIOTspraypaint.jpg

File:RIOTspraypaint.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Riot.GFX (notify | contribs).

• OR, no target article or encyc use given Skier Dude (talk) 08:04, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

File:RSgun.jpg

File:RSgun.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rudesquad (notify | contribs).

• OR, UE, appears to be merely self-promotion Skier Dude (talk) 08:13, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Old Pr baseball game poster.gif

File:Old Pr baseball game poster.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

• Not really PD-Old. Image is from 1924. Damiens.rf 13:57, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
• Keep - The image is a non-repeatable historic event that is associated with the migration of Puerto Ricans to New York. Proper rationale was provided and image is discussed in the article. The "PD-Old" license has been replaces. Tony the Marine (talk) 15:30, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
  • The image is not discussed in the article. The article does not call for such illustration. It's an unnecessary non-free image. --Damiens.rf 19:47, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
    • I have added a rationale for a second article. The Porto Rican Stars, which are illustrated are extensively mentioned in Francisco Coimbre's article and the subject in question is illustrated in it. - Caribbean~H.Q. 02:03, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
      • The image is still an unnecessary non-free image. Please get acquainted to WP:NFCC#8. We only use non-free material when it's necessary for increasing the understanding of the article. Neither Francisco Coimbre or Puerto Rican migration to New York is harder to understand without an image of an "early poster announcing a baseball game". --Damiens.rf 04:38, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
• Keep per Caribbean H.Q, proper rationale has been added. --Jmundo (talk) 02:47, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Proper rationale? It's just a copy and paste from Marine's imbecile rationales that contains absurds like "The image is not subject to copyright laws, it is pre- 1925" (what???) and "the image itself is discussed in the article" (when it's not!). --Damiens.rf 04:38, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Warning! - You better stop your personal attacks to me. You calling me an "imbecile" is a personal attack and if you continue you to do so you will be blocked from editing. This is the second time that I have warned you on this forum of your childish behavior. For an "imbecile" I have made more positive contributions to Wikipedia then you will ever have. Tony the Marine (talk) 04:53, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Oscar Garcia Rivera2.jpg

File:Oscar Garcia Rivera2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

• Unnecessary non-free picture of a politician and some reporter. Damiens.rf 14:01, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
• Keep - Image of Puerto Rican historical figure and proper rationale within Wikipedia policy has been provided. Tony the Marine (talk) 15:32, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
  • That rationale is a joke and as an admin you should know better. --Damiens.rf 19:48, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

• Keep - The nominator does not seem familiar with WP:NFCI # 8 or WP:CIVIL for that matter. - Caribbean~H.Q. 02:35, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
  • WP:NFCI # 8 clearly says: "As subjects of commentary". This picture is not subject of commentary. Do you understand what it means for a picture to be subject of commentary, don't you? --Damiens.rf 04:41, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Oscar Garcia Rivera .jpg

File:Oscar Garcia Rivera .jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

• Replaceable image. As an U.S. politician, some official images of this man should be available in the public domain. Damiens.rf 14:03, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
• Keep - False claim by nominator. Image is of historic Puerto Rican figure and not-replaceable. Proper rationale within Wikipedia policy was provided and it is a simple, but unproven assumption that just because a person was a U.S. politician, some official images of this man should be available in the public domain. A quick google search reveals that there no other images of said figure:Google image search If so, prove me wrong and please provide one, thank you. Tony the Marine (talk) 15:36, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
• Keep I can't find a replaceable image, maybe the nominator can point the way. --Jmundo (talk) 01:47, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
  • (I guess you mean a "replacement" image). The policy doesn't says we use non-free images when Damiens and Jmundo fail to find a replacement. It says we only use it when a replacement in unlikely to be found or produced. In the case of an American politician, all his official photos are in the public domain (although not all his official photos are on the Internet, lazy boy). --Damiens.rf 01:51, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
• Comment - Damiens and Jmundo can not find a replacement, because there simply isn't any. Maybe this his official photo and then again maybe not all American politicians have an official photo. You are speculating about an image which really does not have any justifiable reason for deletion. Tony the Marine (talk) 02:36, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Puerto Ricans arriving by ship.gif

File:Puerto Ricans arriving by ship.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

• I don't believe this image is 100 years old. Also, I could not find the file when following the link provided. Damiens.rf 14:06, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
• Keep - It is common that some website cease to exsist in the Internet with the passage of time, however good faith uploading of said image must be assumed. Said image is about a historical great migration of group of people to the United States. proper Wikipedia rationale has been provided. Tony the Marine (talk) 15:43, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
  • It's now an example of unnecessary use of a non-free image. --Damiens.rf 19:50, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
• Keep - The nominator does not seem familiar with WP:NFCI # 8. The image relevant to the topic that is discussed throughout the article. - Caribbean~H.Q. 02:38, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
  • WP:NFCI # 8 says the image must be "subject of commentary" and not just "relevant to the topic". Do you really believe you can use any non-free image that is simply relevant to the topic discussed in the article? --Damiens.rf 04:44, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

File:PRarrivebyplane .gif

File:PRarrivebyplane .gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

• This image fails WP:NFCC#8: We don't need to see a picture of people leaving an air-plane to read about Puerto Rican migration to New York. It's just an illustration that gives no more information than the article's own text. Damiens.rf 14:08, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
• Keep- Image contains proper rationale for usage and yes, it is used to illustrate the impact which air travel had in the historical Great Migration of the people of Puerto Rico to New York and the United States in general. Tony the Marine (talk) 15:54, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Have you ever ever heard about WP:NFCC#8 and how we don't use non-free content for frivolous decoration? --Damiens.rf 19:52, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
    • Keep - The nominator does not seem familiar with WP:NFCI # 8, "Images with iconic status or historical importance". - Caribbean~H.Q. 02:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
      • "WP:NFCI # 8 Images with iconic status or historical importance: As subjects of commentary.". --Damiens.rf 04:47, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Kultima3.jpg

File:Kultima3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lindseymr7 (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:11, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Kultima2.jpg

File:Kultima2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lindseymr7 (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:11, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Kultima1.jpg

File:Kultima1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lindseymr7 (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:11, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

File:1998NMFCpre-season.jpg

File:1998NMFCpre-season.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lx45803 (notify | contribs).

• Not an "unique historic image", just a funny decorative picture. Damiens.rf 19:35, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. Decorative image removed and tagged for speedy deletion as such. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:33, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

File:NMFC99premiers.png

File:NMFC99premiers.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by NimChief (notify | contribs).

• Not an "unique historic image", just a funny decorative picture. Damiens.rf 19:36, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

File:1946NMFC3rdsside.jpg

File:1946NMFC3rdsside.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by NimChief (notify | contribs).

• Not an "unique historic image", just a funny decorative picture. Maybe PD according to Australian law, I don't know. Damiens.rf 19:36, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

File:BorinquenPost1216.-7.jpg

File:BorinquenPost1216.-7.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

• No evidence this image was released before 1923 as the licensing tag says. Source information is not verifiable (it seems to be an undocumented Wikipedia-only permission of use). Damiens.rf 19:56, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

File:PR Jewish Poster2.JPG

File:PR Jewish Poster2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

• Collage of pictures that do not credits the original images. A lot of licensing problems may be hidden. Damiens.rf 19:58, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
• Keep' I created poster from images which are PD and found in Wikipedia under subjects article. As sole creator and uploader of the poster, I take full responsibility for all it's content. I and not Wikipedia can be held legally responsible. Tony the Marine (talk) 20:19, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
• Keep This request is not a matter of deletion, it can be fix. No evidence of licensing problems found. --Jmundo (talk) 01:56, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
  • I will happily withdraw the nomination once it's fixed. But it should be deleted if no one does so. --Damiens.rf 04:48, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

File:PR Corsican Poster.JPG

File:PR Corsican Poster.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

• Collage of pictures that do not credits the original images. A lot of licensing problems may be hidden. Damiens.rf 20:00, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
• Keep' I created poster from images which are PD and found in Wikipedia under subjects article. As sole creator and uploader of the poster, I take full responsibility for all it's content. I and not Wikipedia can be held legally responsible.Tony the Marine (talk) 20:20, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
  • You know you have to disclose the source images, don't you? --Damiens.rf 20:26, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
  • For an example of a competently made collage, see File:Spanish immigration to Puerto Rico.jpg. --Damiens.rf 20:30, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Yauco Coffee Plantation.gif

File:Yauco Coffee Plantation.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

• Image not really found on source Damiens.rf 20:01, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
• Strong Keep - Do not delete. Another source has been added. This image can be found in The Histoic and Photografic Archive of Puerto Rico. It is dated Sept. 1922 and therefore free of copyright laws since it is pre the Jan. 1, 1923 date. Tony the Marine (talk) 02:04, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
• The image predates copyright, I'm not even sure what the issue is here. - Caribbean~H.Q. 02:42, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

File:PR French Poster2.JPG

File:PR French Poster2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

• Collage of pictures that do not credits the original images. A lot of licensing problems may be hidden (for instance, creative commons images can't be relicensed as gfdl, as the uploader did, and almost all licensing require attribution on derivative works, what as not respected here) Damiens.rf 20:03, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
• Keep' I created poster from images which are PD and found in Wikipedia under subjects article. As sole creator and uploader of the poster, I take full responsibility for all it's content. I and not Wikipedia can be held legally responsible. Tony the Marine (talk) 20:20, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
• Keep The deletion rationale is based on assumptions, not evidence. --Jmundo (talk) 02:55, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Early fench Settler.jpg

File:Early fench Settler.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

• Image is not really found on source. No evidence this is PD. Damiens.rf 20:05, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
• Keep - The nominator does not seem familiar with WP:NFCI # 8. - Caribbean~H.Q. 02:30, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

File:LaCasaFrancesa.gif

File:LaCasaFrancesa.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

• This image was not "first published prior to January 1, 1923". Also, source is not valid. Damiens.rf 20:06, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Sixto Escobar El Mundo.jpg

File:Sixto Escobar El Mundo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

• This non-free scan of a newspaper is not necessary for the article. Just a decorative use of a non-free image. Damiens.rf 20:17, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
• Keep"' With all due respect image is not decorative and proper rationale for usage was provided. Tony the Marine (talk) 20:24, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
  • The rationale does not explain why the image is used. You understand this is necessary, don't you? --Damiens.rf 20:33, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
• Keep - The nominator does not seem familiar with WP:NFCI # 8. The subject is clearly discussed in Escobar's article. - Caribbean~H.Q. 02:28, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

File:LuisRodriguezOlmo.jpg

File:LuisRodriguezOlmo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

• Image is not found on source. It looks like a professional picture. Just because the subject is dead, it doesnt means we can ignore the photographer's copyrights. We should use an image we know the origin to make sure we're not doing anything wrong. Damiens.rf 20:21, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

• Keep - The nominator does not seem familiar with WP:NFCI # 8. - Caribbean~H.Q. 02:28, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
• Keep There's no evidence of copyright violation.--Jmundo (talk) 02:39, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

File:PR German Poster.JPG

File:PR German Poster.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

• Collage of pictures that do not credits the original images. A lot of licensing problems may be hidden (gfdl and cc always require attribution, to begin with.). Damiens.rf 20:28, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
• Keep' I created poster from images which are PD and found in Wikipedia under subjects article. As sole creator and uploader of the poster, I take full responsibility for all it's content. I and not Wikipedia can be held legally responsible. Tony the Marine (talk) 20:20, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Pedroross.jpg

File:Pedroross.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Juancro (notify | contribs).

• No source and replaceable non-free image. Damiens.rf 20:31, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

File:PR Irish Poster3.JPG

File:PR Irish Poster3.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

• Collage of pictures that do not credits the original images. A lot of licensing problems may be hidden. Damiens.rf 20:33, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
• Keep' I created poster from images which are PD and found in Wikipedia under subjects article. Tony the Marine (talk) 20:20, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Be nice and put the links to the original files on the images description page. Also, cite the author of individual images. --Damiens.rf 21:05, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

So, you had to nominate the file for deletion instead of asking nicely for this in the user talk page? --Jmundo (talk) 01:24, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

If it comes out that the individual licenses are incompatible, that file will have to be deleted anyway. And I doubt the uploader was careful about that (he already violated the free licenses by not giving attribution to the original authors). --Damiens.rf 01:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

• As sole creator and uploader of the poster, I take full responsibility for all it's content. I and not Wikipedia can be held legally responsible. Tony the Marine (talk) 04:03, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

File:BR1 Yoshitoki Shuya Noriko Classroom.jpg

File:BR1 Yoshitoki Shuya Noriko Classroom.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Henrickson (notify | contribs).

• Unjustifiable FU image; it does not significantly increase readers' understanding its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding. ÷seresin 20:46, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

File:ShuyaandNorikotogether.jpg

File:ShuyaandNorikotogether.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Supernumerary (notify | contribs).

• Unjustifiable FU image; it does not significantly increase readers' understanding its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding. ÷seresin 20:46, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

File:ShiroiwaClassB.jpg

File:ShiroiwaClassB.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bishusui (notify | contribs).

• Unjustifiable FU image; it does not significantly increase readers' understanding its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding. ÷seresin 20:46, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Utuado Massacre.jpg

File:Utuado Massacre.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

• Unnecessary non-free picture. No unique relevant useful information is transmitted by this picture. Damiens.rf 20:53, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
• Keep Image is important since it is about a historical event and shows part of the attack against the Puerto Rican Nationalists by the Puerto Rican police. Tony the Marine (talk) 21:25, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
• Keep per Tony, this is a historical event and is relevant to the subject. --Jmundo (talk) 01:16, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
  • That the image is a picture taken a an historic event, it doesn't follows that it passes our non-free content criteria. This image does not help the reader to understand the article about the historic event. It's unnecessary non-free content. --Damiens.rf 01:35, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
• Comment - You are entittled to your opinion, however this image is worth more then a thousand words and gives an impacting idea of the events. The image contains it's source and rationale in accordance to policy. Tony the Marine (talk) 02:28, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
• Keep - The nominator does not seem familiar with WP:NFCI # 8. - Caribbean~H.Q. 02:25, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Elias Beauchamp.jpg

File:Elias Beauchamp.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jmundo (notify | contribs).

• Unnecessary non-free image (copied from some random website). Not helpful for the understanding of the article. Damiens.rf 20:56, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
• Keep - Elias Beauchamp was one of the principal protagonists to the Rio Piedras massacre. Tony the Marine (talk) 21:27, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
  • So what? We should ignore possible copyrights and our policy in such cases? How is the readers understanding impaired by the lack this picture? --Damiens.rf 01:36, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
• Keep This is an historical image of one of the main protagonists moments before he was killed at the police station. --Jmundo (talk) 01:11, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
• Keep - The nominator does not seem familiar with WP:NFCI # 8. - Caribbean~H.Q. 02:26, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Casaroja.jpg

File:Casaroja.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

• Article says the image is from 1960, so the author can't be death for more than 100 years. Damiens.rf 20:57, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
• Keep - You are right in your reasoning, therefore a rationale for use has been provided. Tony the Marine (talk) 21:23, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
  • It's now an unnecessary non-free image. Marine, please understand that rationales are supposed to explain why the specific image is necessary in the specific article. What you call "rationales" is a joke. --Damiens.rf 01:44, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
    • Comment - You don't have to be insulting about it. I am not a "Joker" and I have dealt with you in a respectful way up to now in what seems to me to be Anti-Puerto Rican image agenda. I'm not saying this to be rude, just that it seems that way since all of your nominations have been directed towards Puerto Rican related subjects. The Image is of significant historical importance and adds to the understanding of the article since this is the actual place where the revolution started. Tony the Marine (talk) 02:15, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

• Keep - The nominator does not seem familiar with WP:NFCI # 8. - Caribbean~H.Q. 02:24, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
• Keep Proper rationale was added. --Jmundo (talk) 02:42, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Bob-Dylan.png

File:Bob-Dylan.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sambo (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, not useful for an encyclopedia. JaGa^talk 21:03, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

File:My bodyLR.jpg

File:My bodyLR.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Karynmannix (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 23:04, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

File:OriginalSketch.jpg

File:OriginalSketch.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by IAmJack600 (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 23:06, 7 December 2009 (UTC)