User talk:Wee Curry Monster: Difference between revisions
→Arbitration Enforcement Result: new section |
→Gibraltar Discretionary Sanctions: new section |
||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
* All editors on the articles {{article|Gibraltar}} and {{article|Demographics of Gibraltar}} and their associated talk pages active within the past 30 days will be warned that any disruption, including incivility, edit warring and tendentious conduct, is subject to discretionary sanctions ([[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gibraltar#Discretionary sanctions]]). |
* All editors on the articles {{article|Gibraltar}} and {{article|Demographics of Gibraltar}} and their associated talk pages active within the past 30 days will be warned that any disruption, including incivility, edit warring and tendentious conduct, is subject to discretionary sanctions ([[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gibraltar#Discretionary sanctions]]). |
||
This is logged at the ArbCom case page.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FCase%2FGibraltar&action=historysubmit&diff=402617272&oldid=366803171] If you have any further questions or comments, please leave them on my talk page. [[User:Vassyana|Vassyana]] ([[User talk:Vassyana|talk]]) 01:25, 16 December 2010 (UTC) |
This is logged at the ArbCom case page.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FCase%2FGibraltar&action=historysubmit&diff=402617272&oldid=366803171] If you have any further questions or comments, please leave them on my talk page. [[User:Vassyana|Vassyana]] ([[User talk:Vassyana|talk]]) 01:25, 16 December 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Gibraltar Discretionary Sanctions == |
|||
This is a courtesy note to inform you that articles and discussions about Gibraltar or concerning the history, people, or political status of Gibraltar are subject to a discretionary sanctions remedy. Please see [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gibraltar#Discretionary sanctions]]. You are being notified per the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FCase%2FGibraltar&action=historysubmit&diff=402617272&oldid=366803171 actions logged here]. Any [[WP:DE|disruptive]], [[WP:CIVIL|uncivil]], or [[WP:TE|generally problematic]] conduct may lead to discretionary sanctions imposed by an administrator. This warning is not an indication of any wrong doing on your part. It is simply a general notice to recent editors in the topic area. Thank you for understanding. [[User:Vassyana|Vassyana]] ([[User talk:Vassyana|talk]]) 01:43, 16 December 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:43, 16 December 2010
|
——————————————— Wee Curry Monster's Talk Page ———————————————
|
|
“ | Many people are like garbage trucks. They run around full of garbage, full of frustration, full of anger, and full of disappointment. As their garbage piles up, they look for a place to dump it. And if you let them, they’ll dump it on you. So when someone wants to dump on you, don’t take it personally. Just smile, wave, wish them well, and move on. Believe me. You’ll be happier. --THE LAW OF THE GARBAGE TRUCK | ” |
The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010
|
Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pfainuk for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 13:49, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
AE Courtesy Note
This is a courtesy note to let you know that you have been mentioned by name at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Result concerning Wee Curry Monster and a proposed user conduct solution has been posted. You are named in proposed sanctions.
- Wee Curry Monster is banned from all discussions about or concerning the history, people, or political status of Gibraltar for 7 days.
- Wee Curry Monster is banned from editing mainspace articles about or concerning the history, people, or political status of Gibraltar for 30 days.
- Wee Curry Monster is warned that further disruption will result in escalating sanctions and advised to pursue dispute resolution to resolve any disagreements.
If you have any response or objection, please note it at the request. Vassyana (talk) 03:55, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Ahoy
I'll keep responses to th other thing on my page. Are you ok old man? You seem a little off. F--- the daft WP politics and what not, I hope all is well. Oh, and if you fancy writing a paper for me on Britain's preperation for economic warfare pre-1914, that would be grand. --Narson ~ Talk • 10:40, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, just take care, ok chap? And you never know. Mood stabilising drugs take the extremes out, but they can take too much, calm the sea too much. Pragmatism is balls (A lesson hard learned by a Lib Dem ;) ) --Narson ~ Talk • 10:59, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Comment about AE thread
You do not seem to fully grasp the problem with your 'recent' conduct. I am taking history into account, but my actions were based on more recent activity. Let me briefly address the other editors:
A review of Richard's 'recent' edits indicate a return to civility and focus on content. I thought some of his comments leading up to the recent period were particular problematic and a large part of the degradation of the talk page environment, so I included a named sanction for him. Given the lack of immediate, recent problems, I limited the matter to a warning.
A review of Imalbornoz's 'recent' edits were generally focused on content. There were some previous outbreaks, but nothing recent to address. An editor to keep an eye on perhaps, but no current matters to handles.
Addressing your conduct, you made a very bold edit. That in itself is not a problem. However, you continued to revert during discussion and insisted on pushing your after it was clear there was no consensus for that significant change. Your edits and talk page comments were the focus of the mess that happened a month ago. That is not acceptable and part of what landed you in trouble during the ArbCom case.
Also reflecting your prior troubles, your comments continued to be a problem after everyone else cooled their tone down and focused on the content. Protestations of innocence to the contrary, you have repeatedly expressed bad faith accusations:
- Accusation of deliberate POV editing and obstruction
- Similar accusations, plus tag teaming notions
- A big bag of bad faith accusations
This is recent conduct and continuing over days. It is clearly uncivil and disruptive. I reject that baiting makes the behavior excusable in any way, especially after all other editors were again mostly focused on discussing content. If you have a problem with someone's conduct, leave a polite note for them asking them to tone it down, come to the table, etc. Pursue one of the venues for addressing user conduct. If you don't know where to turn, ask me. I will be glad to offer you a couple of possibilities. Vassyana (talk) 17:49, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Please note that I have revised my suggested remedy, based on Richard's suggestion that you be permitted to remain involved. Vassyana (talk) 18:00, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Olive branches
Sorry to write in your talk page, but I was hoping it would be the best place to leave this olive branch[1]. I found another one from Richard Keatinge just before mine [2]. Maybe now you can reconsider your accepting us in your talkpage? I know you don't share my opinions, but one of the many good things about WP is that it's a wonderful framework to discuss differences calmly and find some neutral ground together. -- Imalbornoz (talk) 22:01, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 00:39, 16 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Arbitration Enforcement Result
- Wee Curry Monster is subject to a standard 0RR restriction for all articles about or concerning the history, people, or political status of Gibraltar for 30 days. As with normal revert restrictions, good faith edits reverting vandals and known sockpuppets are not subject to this restriction.
- Wee Curry Monster is warned against bad faith accusations, that further disruption will result in escalating sanctions and advised to pursue dispute resolution to resolve any disagreements.
- Richard Keatinge is warned to refrain from incivility and encouraged to utilize appropriate venues for resolving user conduct complaints. Any future talk page disruption will be handled under discretionary sanctions (Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gibraltar#Discretionary sanctions).
- All editors on the articles Gibraltar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and Demographics of Gibraltar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and their associated talk pages active within the past 30 days will be warned that any disruption, including incivility, edit warring and tendentious conduct, is subject to discretionary sanctions (Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gibraltar#Discretionary sanctions).
This is logged at the ArbCom case page.[3] If you have any further questions or comments, please leave them on my talk page. Vassyana (talk) 01:25, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Gibraltar Discretionary Sanctions
This is a courtesy note to inform you that articles and discussions about Gibraltar or concerning the history, people, or political status of Gibraltar are subject to a discretionary sanctions remedy. Please see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gibraltar#Discretionary sanctions. You are being notified per the actions logged here. Any disruptive, uncivil, or generally problematic conduct may lead to discretionary sanctions imposed by an administrator. This warning is not an indication of any wrong doing on your part. It is simply a general notice to recent editors in the topic area. Thank you for understanding. Vassyana (talk) 01:43, 16 December 2010 (UTC)