User talk:Richard Keatinge

Archive 1 June 2006-Dec 2009

Info

I've stopped using my real life ID due to inappropriate comments on wikipedia and some harassment off-wiki. I'd be grateful if you'd stop using it please. Wee Curry Monster talk 17:03, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

OK. There may be times when it's necessary to mention that the two identities are one person, but I will do my best. Richard Keatinge (talk) 17:11, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

AE Courtesy Note

• Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Wee Curry Monster

This is a courtesy note to let you know that you have been mentioned by name at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Result concerning Wee Curry Monster and a proposed user conduct solution has been posted. You are named in a proposed sanction.

• Richard Keatinge is warned to refrain from incivility and bad faith accusations, and encouraged to utilize appropriate venues for resolving user conduct complaints. Any future talk page disruption will be handled under discretionary sanctions (Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gibraltar#Discretionary sanctions).

If you have any response or objection, please note it at the request. Vassyana (talk) 03:55, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

I have altered my suggested remedy for Wee Curry Monster, based on your suggestion he should be allowed to continue in discussions. Please check the enforcement thread and share your thoughts. Vassyana (talk) 17:56, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Comment about AE thread

A review of your 'recent' edits indicates a return to civility and focus on content. I commend that and highly recommend you continue down that road. It is best for everyone.

Your comments were a key factor in the degradation of the talk page environment from my outside perspective. That is why I crafted a named sanction. It is not a recent issue, so it was limited to a warning.

Consider the warning a note your comments in response to the bold edits and participation of WCM were over the line. Paragraphs about the incompetence of other editors, repeatedly bemoaning the presence of someone, etc is terrible form. It poisons the well and baits them into poor responses. Stick to the content on the article talk page. Use appropriate venues for user conduct to address those issues. If you find yourself arguing in circles, it would be best to seek out dispute resolution.

If you are ever unsure of the appropriate avenue, please ask me. I've been all over this place, from answering third opinion requests to serving on ArbCom. I'm sure I can usually point you towards a couple of avenues to resolve any outstanding issues. Vassyana (talk) 17:19, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Duly accepted. I will readjust my ideas of constructive discourse. Thanks for the offer of help in future. I hope I don't need to take you up on it, but you never know. Richard Keatinge (talk) 17:38, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the cordial response. I appreciate you taking the response and advice on-board. I know things can get frustrating at times, but try to stay focused on building the encyclopedia. Whether you need advice for user conduct or just some help sorting out content issues, let me know. I will honestly do my best to help resolve the situation. Vassyana (talk) 18:03, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Arbitration Enforcement Result

• Wee Curry Monster is subject to a standard 0RR restriction for all articles about or concerning the history, people, or political status of Gibraltar for 30 days. As with normal revert restrictions, good faith edits reverting vandals and known sockpuppets are not subject to this restriction.
• Wee Curry Monster is warned against bad faith accusations, that further disruption will result in escalating sanctions and advised to pursue dispute resolution to resolve any disagreements.
• Richard Keatinge is warned to refrain from incivility and encouraged to utilize appropriate venues for resolving user conduct complaints. Any future talk page disruption will be handled under discretionary sanctions (Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gibraltar#Discretionary sanctions).
• All editors on the articles Gibraltar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and Demographics of Gibraltar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and their associated talk pages active within the past 30 days will be warned that any disruption, including incivility, edit warring and tendentious conduct, is subject to discretionary sanctions (Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gibraltar#Discretionary sanctions).

This is logged at the ArbCom case page.[1] If you have any further questions or comments, please leave them on my talk page. Vassyana (talk) 01:26, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Gibraltar Discretionary Sanctions

This is a courtesy note to inform you that articles and discussions about Gibraltar or concerning the history, people, or political status of Gibraltar are subject to a discretionary sanctions remedy. Please see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gibraltar#Discretionary sanctions. You are being notified per the actions logged here. Any disruptive, uncivil, or generally problematic conduct may lead to discretionary sanctions imposed by an administrator. This warning is not an indication of any wrong doing on your part. It is simply a general notice to recent editors in the topic area. Thank you for understanding. Vassyana (talk) 01:44, 16 December 2010 (UTC)