Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Enneagram of Personality/FAQ

Talk:Enneagram of Personality/FAQ

Not necessary. The questions that were on here earlier were both 1) not frequently asked, and 2) answered incorrectly. We don't need this FAQ. jps (talk) 00:33, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

• Delete "G8. Pages dependent on a non-existent or deleted page.Such as talk pages with no corresponding subject page" why should the talk page continue when the underlying page has been deleted? That's why I called for the speedy delete--Wlmg (talk) 01:15, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
• Keep The "answered incorrectly" is a content issue -- and removal of all content before proposing for deletion seems contrary to normal procedure. We should determine whether or not to keep a page on the basis of its content before the AfD nom blanks it. AfD is not a good place to settle content issues as a rule. Collect (talk) 01:43, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
• Keep for now, as the page doesn't appear to have been completed yet. Note that the nominator deleted the page's content before nominating it for deletion. I suggest the nominator read WP:ACTIVIST. Cla68 (talk) 01:53, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Following each other around much, Cla68 and Collect? jps (talk) 13:36, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
    • • Appropriate for an AfD comment, Joshua? The overlap between the two editors is de minimis. 8 articles and one essay, for example. And I do not see how such a massive overlap has anything at all to do with this article one whit. Closing admin please note. Collect (talk) 13:43, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
        • You two have been active in very similar areas as of recent, including an activist-amount of interest in WP:ACTIVIST on your part, an essay Cla68 penned. Neither of you comments that often at MfD in the past. Closing admin please note, indeed. jps (talk) 14:20, 13 January 2011 (UTC)