Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonardi Framework: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs) Relisting debate |
→Leonardi Framework: cmt |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 00:00, 27 May 2011 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] |
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 00:00, 27 May 2011 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] |
||
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
||
'''Comment''' Here is the Google translation of the French Wikipedia page for Leonardi, [http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&ie=UTF8&prev=_t&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonardi here]. [[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 03:45, 31 May 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 03:45, 31 May 2011
Leonardi Framework
- Leonardi Framework (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Poorly sourced article about a software package that contains no reliable sources indicating any notability. PROD was removed by single-purpose account after addition of "references" that are primarily dead links and do not address notability concerns. Kinu t/c 17:47, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- CommentHello ! The links have been rectified. Leonardi Framework is not a single purpose entity. In fact reference to its inclusion in a larger research academic community supported by the W3C have been added. Previous poorly working links (unfortunate redirects on the part of the source Internet sites which did not handle Wikipedia standard links) have been removed. Please consider the page Leonardi Framework for inclusion in Wikipedia. Respectfully, Kristeen2011 (talk) 10:00, 23 May 2011 (UTC)Kristeen2001
- Comment The article still lacks citations to reliable sources. I see that some external links were added to some uses of this framework but it's still not clear how this subject might meet notability guidelines.--RadioFan (talk) 12:03, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete The article has no inline citations at all, and three external links. Two of those links are to the Leonardi website. The third gives brief mention of the framework, in rather cryptic note form. Google searches have failed to produce any significant coverage in reliable sources. In short, no evidence at all of notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:07, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Comment Here is the Google translation of the French Wikipedia page for Leonardi, here. Unscintillating (talk) 03:45, 31 May 2011 (UTC)