User talk:MatthiasHuehr: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:22, 28 July 2011

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, MatthiasHuehr! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Marek.69 ^talk 11:03, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of external links

On the other hand, I see that your only contribution so far has been the removal without any explanation of external links from some 50-55 articles. Before continuing with this it would be helpful if you would please explain now what your aim is, as many of the links removed seem to have at least some value. In any event please also see the page on WP:Edit summaries.HeartofaDog (talk) 12:40, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I only delete SPAM, comercial sites and SEO-Links. On the German Wikipedia such sites were banned from then administrators. On this site: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rambin one user set his private site as the official site instead the rigt site. Not only on the english Wikipedia, it was on many versions of Wikipedia! MatthiasHuehr (talk) 12:58, 6 May 2010 (UTC)Matthias[reply]

Matthias, deleting links to SPAM, comercial sites and SEO-Links is very help. However, please indicate why you are deleting links using the Edit summary. This is helpful to other editors. --Dan Dassow (talk) 21:22, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Matthias, and thanks for your reply. If that is all that you are deleting, then it is indeed a good thing. But on, for example, Eldena Abbey, you have also taken out the official website of the town of Greifswald, and a useful/relevant webpage (although admittedly a bit amateurish) on the ruined monastery pictures of Caspar David Friedrich from the website of the Friends of Arnsburg Abbey: both of these are also on the German Wikipedia, and if you just stop and think about it, such sites are likely to be the closest thing to official websites for ruined monasteries, so please can you be more selective? And as per User:Dan Dassow, if you use Edit summaries it avoids creating the impression that you are vandalising. HeartofaDog (talk) 12:49, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

When there is no external link left after deletion, please also delete the headline. Thank you. Greets -- Niteshift (talk) 21:45, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 :When there is no external link left after deletion, please also delete the headline. Thank you. Greets -- [[User:Niteshift|Niteshift]] ([[User talk:Niteshift|talk]]) 21:45, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
-== Links to German language articles ==
-Hi Matthias. I'd like to understand why you're deleting links to clearly-labelled German language articles. It is quite common to link to foreign language sites if they are relevant and there are no English alternatives. At least someone can see an image and have the text translated. If you can find suitable English sites, great! But please do that first. Gruß. --[[User:Bermicourt|Bermicourt]] ([[User talk:Bermicourt|talk]]) 19:21, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
-:Matthias, I have requested a third opinion and their view was that the links are reasonable in this case. I therefore intend to restore them. Please do not remove them without achieving consensus on on the talk pages or at least finding a suitable English link. Thank you. --[[User:Bermicourt|Bermicourt]] ([[User talk:Bermicourt|talk]]) 05:51, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
-== Link disruption ==
-[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Streckelsberg]]. Your edits appear to be [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed.
-* If you are engaged in an article [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|content dispute]] with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's [[WP:DISPUTE|dispute resolution]] page, and ask for independent help at one of the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution#Ask for help at a relevant noticeboard|relevant notice boards]].
-* If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's [[WP:ANI|Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]].
-Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies and guidelines]], please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive; until the dispute is resolved through [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|loss of editing privileges]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 -->
-[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Birnen, Bohnen und Speck]]. Your edits appear to be [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed.
-* If you are engaged in an article [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|content dispute]] with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's [[WP:DISPUTE|dispute resolution]] page, and ask for independent help at one of the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution#Ask for help at a relevant noticeboard|relevant notice boards]].
-* If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's [[WP:ANI|Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]].
-Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies and guidelines]], please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive; until the dispute is resolved through [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|loss of editing privileges]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 -->
-You have been asked before not to remove links without clear justification or discussion. Even if you have initially done this with good faith, if you can see it is disagreed you should open a dialogue. I have reverted your deletions; please discuss them on the talk page if you are unhappy. --[[User:Bermicourt|Bermicourt]] ([[User talk:Bermicourt|talk]]) 06:24, 28 July 2011 (UTC)