User talk:141.218.36.152: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:58, 8 November 2011

Your recent editing history at Emissions & Generation Resource Integrated Database (eGRID) shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block. If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 23:09, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Zero-Net-Energy USA Federal Buildings. Please avoid saying rude things also. Your English is these than "perfect". Thank you. 141.218.36.152 (talk)

Actually, your English is less than acceptable. But other editors have been willing to learn what needs to be said. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 23:17, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What? 141.218.36.152 (talk) 23:17, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agree

Per Talk:Climate_change_mitigation_scenarios#Why_is_this_currently_being_removed.3F ...

I agree with including

Johan Rockström, in a 2009 report, states 350 ppm is one of the planetary boundaries for CO₂ in the atmosphere.^[1]

on Climate change mitigation scenarios. I don't know what Art is referring to with the 350.org comment, since this is about 350 ppm of Carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere. Good luck. 97.87.29.188 (talk) 23:37, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Of course you agree. You're the same person.... — Arthur Rubin (talk) 23:54, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good point 97... 99.56.120.249 (talk) 02:58, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

^ Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin III FS, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P and Foley JA (2009) "Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity" Ecology and Society, 14(2): 32.

[Rockström_a-1] Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin III FS, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P and Foley JA (2009) "Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity" Ecology and Society, 14(2): 32.

[1]

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 Good luck.   [[Special:Contributions/97.87.29.188|97.87.29.188]] ([[User talk:97.87.29.188|talk]]) 23:37, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 :Of course you agree.  You're the same person....  — [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]]  [[User talk:Arthur Rubin|(talk)]] 23:54, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
+:Good point 97...  [[Special:Contributions/99.56.120.249|99.56.120.249]] ([[User talk:99.56.120.249|talk]]) 02:58, 8 November 2011 (UTC)