User talk:Vercetticarl
Archives
Speedy deletion of El Diario de Eddie Avila
A tag has been placed on El Diario de Eddie Avila, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A1.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Shawnpoo 20:06, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as the text has been restored from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wildwildmixes.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Wildwildmixes.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:59, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
November 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from El Duo Dinámico. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as the text has been restored from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bluezy 20:12, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lareunion.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lareunion.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Nely "el arma secreta"
A tag has been placed on Nely "el arma secreta" requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 20:05, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
The article The Final Countdown (Eddie Dee album) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. MastCell Talk 22:09, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Los Bohemios del Reggaeton
A tag has been placed on Los Bohemios del Reggaeton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sting_au Talk 03:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
copyrights
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Acid Munky article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."
You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page. delldot talk 04:02, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Notability of Radio Astronomy (album)
A tag has been placed on Radio Astronomy (album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Murderbike (talk) 04:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Ñejo & Dálmata
A tag has been placed on Ñejo & Dálmata requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sting_au Talk 04:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Broke and Famous
A tag has been placed on Broke and Famous requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sting_au Talk 04:51, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Re deletion of articles
G'day Vercetticarl, the two articles you mentioned. Ñejo & Dálmata and Broke and Famous fail to meet WP:MUSIC. The criteria for musicians and ensembles is given on that page. All I did was tag for deletion because these bands are unremarkable. You will need third part independent references. Sting_au Talk 05:29, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Yaga & Mackie
A tag has been placed on Yaga & Mackie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Travistalk 18:52, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
A Mi Manera (Noztra album)
AfD nomination of A Mi Manera (Noztra album)
An article that you have been involved in editing, A Mi Manera (Noztra album), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Mi Manera (Noztra album). Thank you. Vercetticarl (talk) 20:55, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Masacre Musical, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Masacre Musical. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 18:29, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of El Diario De Eddie Avila
An editor has nominated El Diario De Eddie Avila, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Diario De Eddie Avila and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- As it says above, if you want to comment on the deletion, do it here. Comments on the talk page will not be seen by the people making the decision.Kww (talk) 00:58, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Mi Flow
A tag has been placed on Mi Flow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Xiaphias (talk) 05:58, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
Speedy deletion of Mi Flow
A tag has been placed on Mi Flow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Beach drifter (talk) 11:37, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Jadiel
A tag has been placed on Jadiel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Bfigura (talk) 03:30, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:A la reconquista.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:A la reconquista.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:41, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Urban Soul (Erre XI album)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Urban Soul (Erre XI album), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urban Soul (Erre XI album). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Corvus cornixtalk 23:21, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Luny Tunes Presents: Erre XI
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Luny Tunes Presents: Erre XI, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mdsummermsw (talk) 14:12, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Machucando
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Machucando, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mdsummermsw (talk) 14:15, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Luny Tunes Presents: Erre XI
An article that you have been involved in editing, Luny Tunes Presents: Erre XI, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luny Tunes Presents: Erre XI. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mdsummermsw (talk) 12:28, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
October 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Luny Tunes Presents: Erre XI. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 06:30, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Erre XI, the article you created, has been deleted due to it lacking context. -- IRP ☎ 22:14, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Jadiel
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jadiel, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mdsummermsw (talk) 16:30, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Jadiel
An article that you have been involved in editing, Jadiel, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jadiel. Thank you. Mdsummermsw (talk) 17:11, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Jadiel. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 14:27, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Talento de Barrio Mundial
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Talento de Barrio Mundial, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mdsummermsw (talk) 14:33, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Talento de Barrio Mundial
An article that you have been involved in editing, Talento de Barrio Mundial, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talento de Barrio Mundial. Thank you. Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:55, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Luny Tunes
Yes, I've noticed the page definitely needs more organization. Much of the information on the page needs to be relocated on the producer's production discography. And while you're bringing up the subject of creating articles relating to reggaeton, I've noticed you've created a few articles relating to so that have been nominated for speedy deletion in the past, including Talento de Barrio Mundial, which I redirected to the Talento de barrio soundtrack page. There wasn't enough information or any cited sources to even keep an article for the album re-release. Just a little advice in the future, before you create an article (be it such as an artist, song, album, etc.) make sure you have enough information and cited sources for an article (ex. Esta Noche; Parece Sincera). Remember, not all of my article creations were perfect in the past, and I've improved in my editing since then. Just a little tip for the future. I will try and work at the Luny Tunes article either later on or tomorrow, but remember, I can't do it all on my own :) El Cangri386 23:44, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Lo Mejor de Mí (Jadiel album)
A tag has been placed on Lo Mejor de Mí (Jadiel album), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. SummerPhD (talk) 18:01, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from El Fenómeno. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Without a physical release, this album is not notable without substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. As the article does not currently document such coverage, I am restoring the notability/sourcing tags. Please do not remove these tags without addressing the issue or discussion. Without such coverage, the article may be a candidate for deletion. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 17:19, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- I have again restored the notability/source tags on La Maravilla (album). As this album was not officially released, it is not notable without substantial coverage in independent reliable sources, per WP:MUSIC. Please do not remove the tags again without addressing the issue. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 20:14, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of The Final Countdown (Eddie Dee album)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Final Countdown (Eddie Dee album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Per WP:MUSIC: mixtapes are not notable without substantial coverage in independent reliable sources.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. SummerPhD (talk) 19:46, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of IDON
A tag has been placed on IDON requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. FlyingToaster 03:27, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:El fenomeno official album cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:El fenomeno official album cover.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:06, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Química Sustancia. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 14:26, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Mi Flow: This Is It
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mi Flow: This Is It, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Non-notable, per WP:MUSIC.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. SummerPhD (talk) 14:31, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Mi Flow: This Is It
An article that you have been involved in editing, Mi Flow: This Is It, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mi Flow: This Is It. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 14:15, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Final warning
Your recent edit to La Maravilla (album) constitutes vandalism. As I have discussed[1], this album is not notable without substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. You have been repetedly warned[2][3][4] not to remove maintanence tags from articles without addressing the issues. Consider this your final warning: if you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will' be blocked from editing. - SummerPhD (talk) 14:26, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of IDON
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article IDON, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Per WP:MUSIC, forethcoming albums are not notable without substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. None provided or found for this album.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. SummerPhD (talk) 14:33, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Mi Flow: This Is It
A tag has been placed on Mi Flow: This Is It requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 19:25, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of IDON
An article that you have been involved in editing, IDON, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IDON. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 16:43, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Baby Ranks
A tag has been placed on Baby Ranks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. FlyingToaster 20:31, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Mas Flow 3
An article that you have been involved in editing, Mas Flow 3, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mas Flow 3. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 21:49, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Errexidebutalbum.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Errexidebutalbum.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:07, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Errexidebutalbum.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Errexidebutalbum.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 13:27, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with La Maravilla (album), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. [5] - SummerPhD (talk) 16:15, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of El Patrón
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article El Patrón, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Non-notable future album. Fails WP:MUSIC.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. SummerPhD (talk) 16:31, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry
You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Vercetticarl. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 17:52, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Baby Ranks
An article that you have been involved in editing, Baby Ranks, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baby Ranks. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 18:07, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Blocked
 | This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for sockpuppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Vercetticarl. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ~~~~ |
Cirt (talk) 19:35, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of El Patrón
I have nominated El Patrón, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Patrón. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:37, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Erre XI & Luny Tunes Presents: Erre XI
Hey Vercetticarl, just came by to compliment your article creations for both Erre XI and their first album. You followed a format that should be followed in every album article on Wikipedia and you did a great job doing so. I have made some minor changes to the Luny Tunes Presents: Erre XI article, and I've even added a higher quality album image. You might get a message saying something about the image you uploaded soon, but other than that, keep up the good work! El Cangri386 Sign! or Talk 20:09, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Sólido
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sólido, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Not a notably important song. Has not charted on any major music chart.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. El cangri386 Sign! or Talk 00:12, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Errexidebutalbum.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Errexidebutalbum.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
January 2009
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Eddie Dee. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 17:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
February 2009
IDon was redirected as the result of an AFD discussion, link to above. If you wish to recreate the article, please discuss the matter at deletion review. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 20:13, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Franco "El Gorilla"
A tag has been placed on Franco "El Gorilla" requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez Get to know me! / Talk to me!←at≈:→ 00:26, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Repost of El Patrón
A tag has been placed on El Patrón requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 13:47, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
http://www.youtube.com/user/LosCangriInc —Preceding unsigned comment added by TruthTold (talk • contribs) 17:53, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
No personal attacks
I understand that you are frustrated with the actions of an IP editor, but leaving this kind of comment is completely unacceptable. Please attempt to remain civil and refrain from any such personal attacks in future as they will not help the situation and may only result in you being sanctioned when the other party is originally at fault. Mfield (Oi!) 00:45, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Free Tempo
A tag has been placed on Free Tempo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 15:29, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Roberto micheletti.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Roberto micheletti.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Tom (talk - email) 03:18, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Roberto micheletti.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Roberto micheletti.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Tom (talk - email) 02:37, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Edit war over Manuel Zelaya
Please stop your edit war with Therequiembellishere (talk · contribs) over Manuel Zelaya. Thanks.—C45207 | Talk 08:05, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below. at Manuel Zelaya, per a complaint at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 15:41, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Xiomara de zelaya.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Xiomara de zelaya.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Polly (Parrot) 17:12, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Aguasocaña.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Aguasocaña.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Polly (Parrot) 17:14, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Porfiriolobososa.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Porfiriolobososa.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Polly (Parrot) 17:14, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Comisionadovicepresidente.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Comisionadovicepresidente.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Polly (Parrot) 17:16, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Elvinernestosantos.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Elvinernestosantos.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Polly (Parrot) 17:17, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Continued revert warring at Manuel Zelaya
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below. With this edit, you continued your previous edit war. If this continues, you may be topic banned from all articles relating to Honduras. If you prefer the alternative of an indefinite block, that could be arranged. EdJohnston (talk) 03:59, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not dealing with this crap again. EdJohnson has already warned what'll happen if you try doing it again. Therequiembellishere (talk) 02:03, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- And sign your posts, I don't like going into my history. Therequiembellishere (talk) 02:06, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- I'm busy with a new project right now. Please stop leaving me your messages because they're of no consequence to me. Therequiembellishere (talk) 02:22, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm sure I've put the same impression up to other people before. The worst thing is that no matter what else we've done over our time on Wikipedia, those block will be on our records. If you come to Zelaya's talk and discuss the situation, we will most likely come to an agreement that satisfies our points of view and most likely the community. And I don't know anything about reggaeton; I focus on political templates and, when I feel I have adequate knowledge, the articles themselves. Therequiembellishere (talk) 05:51, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I don't. Almost everyone I know are within my realm. Therequiembellishere (talk) 06:00, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, you too. Therequiembellishere (talk) 06:10, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
I see that you did it again. Don't you think we're all tired of continually seeing those darn two pages in our watchlists? Please, stop it. Discussing it is fine (at least it's an interesting read), reverts without an end is not. --LjL (talk) 13:01, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use Image:Elvinsantos.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Elvinsantos.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 19:56, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use Image:Pepelobo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pepelobo.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 19:57, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (File:Rafaelpinedaponce.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Rafaelpinedaponce.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 19:59, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Daddy Yankee Mundial
Why do you keep on redirecting it to Daddy Yankee. Please stop. User:Pedro thy master —Preceding undated comment added 17:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC).
Daddy Yankee himself said that that would be the name of the album, look in google look any place, but I'm takeing it to the administraters. --Pedro thy master (talk) 02:45, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Edit war on Roberto Micheletti
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Roberto Micheletti. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. This quibbling over semantics in Honduras-related article has gone on for too long already; now that there is consensus on the talk pages, please respect it. LjL (talk) 00:51, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
- To reiterate: please do not edit war to get your preferred version; you may be blocked for this even if you do not breach WP:3RR. If the WP:CONSENSUS is against you, you must respect it (you can seek dispute resolution if you wish). Also, you may not describe a content dispute as "vandalism", as you did here. Please refrain from doing so. If you need to, check the WP:VANDALISM definition. Rd232 talk 07:23, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- Also please don't issue frivolous warnings as you did here [6], or accuse good faith editors enacting consensus of vandalism as you did [7]. Your continued reversions are against consensus. Discuss first and if you cant achieve a consensus for your preferred version, desist.·Maunus·ƛ· 08:51, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- Note the length of this block is due to your repeated 3RR and edit warring infractions.
Destitution
In English "destitution" means "a state of complete poverty". I believe the word you are looking for is "deposition". If you want to change "Coup d'Etat" for "deposition" get consensus on the talk page first.·Maunus·ƛ· 08:54, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Removing sourced opinions and other serious issues with your edits
Please, refrain from removing sourced opinions, as you did here and here. Wikipedia's NPOV policy means "Neutral Point Of View", and absolutely not "No Point Of View" as you seem to claim in your edit summaries. Presenting, and properly attributing, various point of view is indeed one of the founding principles of Wikipedia.
You should also attempt to preserve contents, by not simply removing it like you did for example here and here, where you claim it should be moved to a different article but do not actually perform the move. Additionally, the edit summary you used in the former case is deceptive, because you don't mention that you have also changed "coup d'état" to "constitutional crisis", a change that you very well know to be extremely controversial.
It is also generally unreasonable to assume that someone will "discuss on the talk page" any addition of sourced contents, and in any case you should not simply revert such additions, again on the ground of preserving valid content. You do not own the articles, and you should respect constructive contributions.
To conclude, it is very important that you refrain from labelling an edit "vandalism" in your edit summary, when such an edit is clearly not vandalism, as you did here, here, here, and here; that is a deceptive accusation that is absolutely not acceptable.
Thank you. --LjL (talk) 13:55, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Honduran general election, 2009, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. --LjL (talk) 14:12, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Vercetticarl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
please unblock me so that i can contribute correctly to wikipedia again, thank you
Decline reason:
This request is declined because your unblock does not address the reasons for your block. You are blocked for edit warring, and you have been blocked several times before. Mangojuicetalk 05:52, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Vercetticarl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 190.53.244.15 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Vercetticarl". The reason given for Vercetticarl's block is: "Edit-warring".
IP blocked?
{{unblock-auto|...}}
Further problematic edits
You have, again, changed "coup d'état" into "destitution". Regardless of your political opinions, it should be very clear to you know, after an explanation on your talk page here and a remark on the article's talk page, that the word "destitution" simply doesn't mean anything related to deposing a president.
I understand that English is not your native language, but that doesn't give you permission to blatantly ignore what other people tell you, so, please, check a dictionary of English and stop making such edits: you are certainly being perceived as disruptive. --LjL (talk) 23:50, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Futhermore, you are demonstrating other serious instances of intentional "not getting the point": after I answered your question to the best of my possibilities (and similarly did another editor), you kept, and kept, and kept being disruptive about it. This cannot continue. --LjL (talk) 00:58, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Edit warring
You have been blocked for edit warring on the article Honduras for a period of one week (the length of time is due to your previous violations of the 3RR). Please engage in constructive discussion on the article talk page, rather than simply making repeated changes to the article. I hope that after your block expires, you will find a way to resolve this dispute with other editors, and I would be happy, if needed, to attempt impartial mediation of the issue. Cool3 (talk) 18:18, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Vercetticarl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm so sorry i promise it won't happen again, if i do it again, you can block me forever or for a very long time. I like to make useful contributions to wikipedia, what happened was just a misunderstanding between some editors and me. Please unblock me so that i can contribute correctly to wikipedia as i have done for the past one year and a half. Thank you.
Decline reason:
I don't find that very convincing, because this is not your first block: you have been blocked several times for edit warring already and should have adjusted your behavior a long time ago. (This is your 5th block since early July.) Furthermore, you are not blocked indefinitely: you are blocked for 1 week. In a week you may return to editing. I hope you will use the time until then to try to read up on Wikipedia behavioral policies such as Wikipedia:Edit warring. Mangojuicetalk 20:09, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
IP blocked?
- Vercetticarl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- ... (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Block message:
Not provided
- Blocking administrator: not provided.
Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.
- Vercetticarl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 190.53.244.15 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
[[WP:Edit war|Edit warring]]
Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.
{{unblock|My block was supposed to end August 20 2009 and on that day it suddenly changes that it will now end September 13 2009. My block was only for one week and that week already passed, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Vercetticarl#Edit_warring). Please unblock me so that I can contribute correctly to wikipedia, thank you.}}
- Ok, I see what's going on here. Cool3 blocked you for a week but blocked your IP address, 190.53.244.15, for a month directly. I'll ask him what's going on with that. Mangojuicetalk 18:12, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- This is really not good that you were coordinating an edit war between your account and your IP address. I really don't think this block can be lifted early, and I am absolutely certain it cannot be lifted early if you do not promise not to abuse multiple accounts like that any more. IMO an indefinite block on you would be merited, and may be substantially overdue. If you do get to edit again, you need to know you are on your very last chance. Mangojuicetalk 19:32, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- i know, i'm so sorry, if i do it again, wikipedia can block me forever, i learned my lesson, please unblock me so that i can contribute to wikipedia correctly without engaging in a edit war, thank you Vercetticarl (talk) 19:42, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
IP blocked?
- Vercetticarl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- ... (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Block message:
Not provided
- Blocking administrator: not provided.
Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.
- I am willing to change the block on the IP to a softblock, but before doing so I would like clarification on a few things. It seems abundantly clear that you have also been editing as 190.53.244.15 as that is apparently your IP address. Do you deny that this is the case? If you admit to being that IP, then it does appear that you have not only been edit warring, but also using sockpuppets to do so. In order, then, for me to grant your unblock request, I ask the following things:
- That you voluntarily accept a topic ban on articles relating to Honduras for a period of one month
- That you promise not to engage in sockpuppetry of any kind
- That you pledge not to engage in edit warring, or any activity that might be considered edit warring, and voluntarily consent to abide by a 1RR (one revert per twenty-four hours) on all articles
- If you are willing to meet those three conditions, I will unblock the IP such that you can continue editing. If, however, you violate any of the conditions we agree to, you will be immediately blocked again. Please understand also that this is a voluntary deal between you and me and that other administrators will in no way be bound by what the two of us agree to. If you live up to your end of the bargain, though, I will do my best to ensure that you are allowed to continue editing productively. Cool3 (talk) 20:15, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- I want to contribute to Honduras related articles, in exchange of that:
- I promise not to engage in sockpuppetry of any kind and I also promise not to engage in edit war and I voluntarily agree to abide by a 1RR (one revert per twenty-four hours) on all articles including Honduras related articles.
- If i violate these conditions I agree that I must be blocked again. I want to continue editing productively in all articles including Honduras related articles. Vercetticarl (talk) 20:46, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but I'm not convinced that that is good enough. You have been blocked repeatedly for edit warring on Honduras-related articles, and I'm afraid that you'll just go back to your old ways, whether you mean to or not. I will remove the requirement that you not edit any Honduras-related articles if instead you will agree to: 1. No article edits related to the Presidency of Honduras (you may initiate talk page discussions); 2. No reverts on Honduras-related articles whatsoever (rather than reverting please try to gain consensus on talk pages and find another editor to revert); 3. No controversial edits to any Honduras-related article without first initiating a discussion on the talk page. Cool3 (talk) 21:02, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- I want to contribute to Honduras related articles, in exchange of that:
- I promise that before making any controversial edits to any Honduras-related article I will first disucuss it on it's respective talk page. I also promise that I will not make reverts on Honduras-related articles and that I will first try to gain consensus on talk pages and I will find another editor to revert. I want to contribute productively on all articles including Honduras-related articles. If I violate any of my promises in any article including Honduras-related articles, the solution is very simple: just block me indefinitely, for a year if you want, but I want to contribute productively to Honduras-related articles. Thank you. Vercetticarl (talk) 21:30, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- To me this seems like you are stating in other words that you are going to go directly back to trying to enforce your controversial view of the Honduran presidency conflict and just get other editors to "do the reverts for you". I would not encourage unblocking you untill you state a willingness to leave the topic of the Honduran presidency behind and work on other topics.·Maunus·ƛ· 21:36, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed. In your statement above you did not promise not to make article edits related to the presidency of Honduras, which was one of the conditions I set forward. If you will give me your promise not to make any edits related to this, I will unblock the IP; otherwise, you will remain blocked. Cool3 (talk) 21:44, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- To me this seems like you are stating in other words that you are going to go directly back to trying to enforce your controversial view of the Honduran presidency conflict and just get other editors to "do the reverts for you". I would not encourage unblocking you untill you state a willingness to leave the topic of the Honduran presidency behind and work on other topics.·Maunus·ƛ· 21:36, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- I promise that before making any controversial edits to any Honduras-related article I will first disucuss it on it's respective talk page. I also promise that I will not make reverts on Honduras-related articles and that I will first try to gain consensus on talk pages and I will find another editor to revert. I want to contribute productively on all articles including Honduras-related articles. If I violate any of my promises in any article including Honduras-related articles, the solution is very simple: just block me indefinitely, for a year if you want, but I want to contribute productively to Honduras-related articles. Thank you. Vercetticarl (talk) 21:30, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- I promise not to make any edits that refer to the Presidency of Honduras in the articles: Honduras, Manuel Zelaya and Roberto Micheletti. I will discuss it on their respective talk pages if I feel any changes should be added. Vercetticarl (talk) 21:49, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- There are other articles on the topic than those three.·Maunus·ƛ· 22:04, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- I promise not to make any edits that refer to the Presidency of Honduras in the articles: Honduras, Manuel Zelaya and Roberto Micheletti. I will discuss it on their respective talk pages if I feel any changes should be added. Vercetticarl (talk) 21:49, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
I have provisionally changed the block settings on the IP to allow you to edit as a logged-in user. The IP is still blocked with account creation disabled, but you will still be able to edit using your own account. Any sockpuppetry, edit warring, or violations of our agreement will lead to an immediate block of your account. I look forward to seeing you contribute constructively, and please feel free to contact me if you need any help. Cool3 (talk) 22:15, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
I very strongly suggest that, at this point, you leave the task of changing "de facto" to "interim" or "deposed", etc, and vice versa, as well as that of changing "coup" to "crisis" and vice versa to others. Your edits in this realm are unlikely to be appreciated by most other partecipants. --LjL (talk) 23:44, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Also, this edit specifically seems particularly problematic to me. You changed "military coup" to "constitutional crisis" (as it's typical of you to do), but did you even look at the sentence? A military coup can happen "one day", but can a "constitutional crisis"? A search-and-replace way of editing is not the way to go. Not to mention the unexplained change of "nonbinding referendum" to "binding referendum": other articles say it's non-binding, and that's being discussed right now on Talk:2009 Honduran constitutional crisis. Seriously, are you kidding us? --LjL (talk) 00:46, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Edits that seem to violate the terms of your unblock
See the comment by Maunus at the bottom of User talk:Cool3. I suggest that you *immediately* revert the three changes that Maunus listed. If you fail to do so, action may be taken. EdJohnston (talk) 00:28, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- they already revert them. Vercetticarl (talk) 00:31, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- If it's not already quite clear to you that any behavior violating the terms of your unblock won't be tolerated, I'd just like to point it out again. I'd really suggest that you just steer clear of anything relating to the election whatsoever, perhaps try to find some non-Honduras articles that you'd like to edit for a while; I think it would do everyone good. Cool3 (talk) 00:38, 22 August 2009 (UTC)