User talk:NuclearWarfare

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sven Manguard (talk | contribs) at 23:14, 20 November 2010 (→‎!: forgot to subst:). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Home Talk Email Contributions monobook.js Content Awards Userspace

Temporary Resignation of Administrator Tools

I have decided that it might be a good idea for me to step away from the administrator tools for some time. Accordingly, if you are here to ask a question about an admin action I may have performed, please either to the administrators' noticeboard or to the talk page of another administrator, all of whom for the time being I am granting permission to overrule any admin action I may have made. NW (Talk) 03:34, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hope it's not permanent. Looking at the edit of your userpage is it because you want to focus on content creation? Secret account 03:40, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorta. I also just need a break, and this will help. NW (Talk) 02:36, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you need an admin --> NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 03:18, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to hear of this, alternate temporary accounts superceeded by Polargeo 2. Polargeo 2 (talk) 10:29, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance needed

Hi there NUKE, VASCO here,

i have found out you are sadly no longer an administrator at the site. However, could you please redirect towards someone that can help me with the following two queries (without having to go through the sometimes strenuous investigations, checkusers and so on)?

1 - User:Pararubbas continues, one account after the other, until he reaches 1,000 i believe, new account User:Lkjuiop890 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Lkjuiop890 "contributions" here). He continues creating articles that have been deleted by administrators;

2 - after some vandalism in Mágico González's page, i left a summary warning that if it continued, i would ask for page protection. What do you think happened less than one day before? More vandalism! I need someone to protect the page please.

Attentively, thank you very much in advance, all the best - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 19:37, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you could ask MuZemike or Ron Ritzman? I think that both of them are terrific administrators, and while Ron might not be willing to use the block button, MuZemike certainly will if necessary. NW (Talk) 19:51, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This just survived AfD

Outline of Canada

See the discussion at:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outline of Canada

The Transhumanist    23:29, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh. Wasn't there some sort of agreement that no further articles would be AFD'd unless an RFC was held first? NW (Talk) 14:33, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough

Even if I receive a waiver from Sphilbrick, I have no intention of violating my topic ban. Unlike those who had no interest in Wikipedia aside from Climate Change, or those so offended by the topic banning regime as to have whatevered in protest, I acknowledged my mistakes (early in the case, I might add), endeavored to do better, and will seek to have my scarlet letter removed at the earliest possible juncture. Explaining how other editors were also at fault is unhelpful to this goal - it will merely make ArbCom think that I haven't left the topic area alone. As such, unless I am granted an explicit and personalized waiver from ArbCom, I will not comment further on that, or any other relevant process page. Thank you for your concern, however - it is appreciated. Hipocrite (talk) 20:17, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem ?!

Hi! You have just written: "Do you think that this kind of thing would be a problem for any of your other articles?" From the one hand it is not a problem for me, but from the other hand it is. I wrote hundreds of articles, some without references, but I do not remember which ones (the earliest ?!) they are at the moment. -- Warm regards, dr Mibelz 18:18, 13 Nov 2010 (UTC)

By the way, I was awarded The Tireless Contributor Barnstar -

For constantly creating well referenced chess biographies - SunCreator 16:24, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

...for setting up the talk page link while I was off tidying the mailing lists and so on.  :-) Risker (talk) 21:46, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I saw that you had left it out and I didn't really check the timestamps, so I wasn't sure if you were going to come back to it or not. Looks like everything turned out fine :) NW (Talk) 22:13, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Three men and a boat.

A barnstar for the most humourous title after Three men and a boat, or is it Snowwhite and the seven dwarfs, or Alibaba and forty thieves.[1]Yogesh Khandke (talk) 18:16, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) NW (Talk) 22:03, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

!

Hello NuclearWarfare, Sven Manguard has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Sven Manguard Talk 22:44, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NuclearWarfare&oldid=397951636"