Astrobiology: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Astronomy: fixed wikilink.
Moving WP:Fringe "argument" from the introduction. + Additional ref.
Line 4: Line 4:
'''Astrobiology''' (or '''exobiology''') is the study of the origin, [[evolution]], distribution, and future of [[life]] in the [[universe]], besides [[Earth]]. This [[interdisciplinary]] field encompasses the search for habitable environments in our [[Solar System]] and [[Planetary habitability|habitable planets]] outside our Solar System, the search for evidence of [[Abiogenesis|prebiotic chemistry]], laboratory and field research into the origins and early evolution of [[life on Earth]], and studies of the potential for life to adapt to challenges on [[Earth]] and in [[outer space]].<ref name="about">{{cite web|url=http://astrobiology.nasa.gov/about-astrobiology/ |title=About Astrobiology |accessdate=2008-10-20 |date=21 January 2008 |work=NASA Astrobiology Institute |publisher=NASA }}</ref>
'''Astrobiology''' (or '''exobiology''') is the study of the origin, [[evolution]], distribution, and future of [[life]] in the [[universe]], besides [[Earth]]. This [[interdisciplinary]] field encompasses the search for habitable environments in our [[Solar System]] and [[Planetary habitability|habitable planets]] outside our Solar System, the search for evidence of [[Abiogenesis|prebiotic chemistry]], laboratory and field research into the origins and early evolution of [[life on Earth]], and studies of the potential for life to adapt to challenges on [[Earth]] and in [[outer space]].<ref name="about">{{cite web|url=http://astrobiology.nasa.gov/about-astrobiology/ |title=About Astrobiology |accessdate=2008-10-20 |date=21 January 2008 |work=NASA Astrobiology Institute |publisher=NASA }}</ref>


Astrobiology makes use of [[physics]], [[chemistry]], [[astronomy]], [[biology]], [[molecular biology]], [[ecology]], [[planetary science]], [[geography]], and [[geology]] to investigate the possibility of life on other worlds and help recognize [[biosphere]]s that might be different from the biosphere on Earth.<ref>[http://www.itwire.com.au/content/view/11647/1066/ iTWire - Scientists will look for alien life, but Where and How?]</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=The life and death of planet Earth |last=Ward |first=P. D. |authorlink= |coauthors=Brownlee, D. |year=2004 |publisher=Owl Books |location=New York |isbn=0805075127 |pages= }}</ref> Astrobiology concerns itself with interpretation of existing [[Scientific method|scientific data]]; given more detailed and reliable data from other parts of the universe, the roots of astrobiology itself—physics, chemistry and biology—may have their theoretical bases challenged. Although speculation is entertained to give context, astrobiology concerns itself primarily with [[hypotheses]] that fit firmly into existing [[Theory#Science|scientific theories]]. According to American astrophysicist [[Neil deGrasse Tyson]]: "At the moment, life on Earth is the only known life in the Universe, but there are compelling arguments to suggest we are not alone."<ref>{{cite web | url = http://astrobiology.nasa.gov/articles/the-search-for-life-in-the-universe/ | title = The Search for Life in the Universe | accessdate = 2011-03-07 | first = Neil deGrasse Tyson | date = 23 July 2001 | work = Department of Astrophysics and Hayden Planetarium | publisher = NASA}}</ref>
Astrobiology makes use of [[physics]], [[chemistry]], [[astronomy]], [[biology]], [[molecular biology]], [[ecology]], [[planetary science]], [[geography]], and [[geology]] to investigate the possibility of life on other worlds and help recognize [[biosphere]]s that might be different from the biosphere on Earth.<ref>[http://www.itwire.com.au/content/view/11647/1066/ iTWire - Scientists will look for alien life, but Where and How?]</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=The life and death of planet Earth |last=Ward |first=P. D. |authorlink= |coauthors=Brownlee, D. |year=2004 |publisher=Owl Books |location=New York |isbn=0805075127 |pages= }}</ref> Astrobiology concerns itself with interpretation of existing [[Scientific method|scientific data]]; given more detailed and reliable data from other parts of the universe, the roots of astrobiology itself—physics, chemistry and biology—may have their theoretical bases challenged. Although speculation is entertained to give context, astrobiology concerns itself primarily with [[hypotheses]] that fit firmly into existing [[Theory#Science|scientific theories]]. Earth is the only place in the universe known to harbor life and there is no conclusive evidence of life beyond our planetary
system.<ref> {{citation | first = Robert W. Graham | contribution = Extraterrestrial Life in the Universe | title = NASA Technical Memorandum 102363 | publisher = NASA | place = Lewis Research Center, Ohio | year = February 1990| id = | contribution-url = http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19900013148_1990013148.pdf | format = PDF | accessdate = 2011-03-08}}</ref><ref> {{cite web | url = http://www.history.com/topics/earth | title = Earth | accessdate = 2011-03-07 | last = Jonathan I. Lunine | first = Raymond Jeanloz | publisher = History.com}}</ref>


== Overview ==
== Overview ==
Line 99: Line 100:


[[Image:951 Gaspra.jpg|thumb|right|220px|Asteroid(s) may have transported life to [[Earth]].]]
[[Image:951 Gaspra.jpg|thumb|right|220px|Asteroid(s) may have transported life to [[Earth]].]]
{{As of|2010}}, no proof of extraterrestrial life has been identified. Examination of the [[ALH 84001]] meteorite, which was recovered in [[Antarctica]] in 1984 and believed to have originated from [[Mars]], is thought by [[David S. McKay|David McKay]], Chief Scientist for Astrobiology at [[NASA]]'s [[Johnson Space Center]], as well as other scientists, to contain [[Fossil#Microfossils|microfossils]] of extraterrestrial origin; this interpretation is controversial.<ref name=disbelief>{{cite web |title=Experts: Little Evidence of Life on Mars | url=http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2006/08/08/marslife_spa.html?category=space&guid=20060808100030 |last=Crenson |first=Matt |publisher=[[Associated Press]] (on [http://dsc.discovery.com discovery.com]) |date=2006-08-06 |accessdate=2011-03-08 }}</ref><ref name="life">{{cite journal|title= Search for past life on Mars: Possible relic biogenic activity in Martian meteorite ALH84001|author= McKay DS, Gibson EK, ThomasKeprta KL, Vali H, Romanek CS, Clemett SJ, Chillier XDF, Maechling CR, Zare RN |journal=Science|volume= 273|pages=924–930|year=1996|doi= 10.1126/science.273.5277.924|pmid= 8688069|issue= 5277}}</ref><ref name="jsc2009">http://www.nasa.gov/centers/johnson/pdf/403089main_7441-1.pdf</ref><ref name=McKay>{{cite journal |title=Life on Mars: new evidence from martian meteorites |author=McKay DS, Thomas-Keprta KL, Clemett, SJ, Gibson, EK Jr, Spencer L, Wentworth SJ |journal=[[Proc. SPIE]] |volume=7441 |year=2009 |url=http://spiedigitallibrary.org/proceedings/resource/2/psisdg/7441/1/744102_1?isAuthorized=no |doi=10.1117/12.832317 |accessdate=2011-03-08 }}</ref> On 5 March 2011, [[Richard B. Hoover]], a scientist with the [[Marshall Space Flight Center]], speculates on the finding of alleged microfossils similar to [[cyanobacteria]] in [[CI1 fossils|CI1]] carbonaceous [[meteorites]].<ref name=Tenney>{{cite web |last=Tenney |first=Garrett |title=Exclusive: NASA Scientist Claims Evidence of Alien Life on Meteorite |url=http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/03/05/exclusive-nasa-scientists-claims-evidence-alien-life-meteorite/ |publisher=[[FoxNews]] |date=5 March 2011 |accessdate=2011-03-06 }}</ref><ref name=Hoover>{{cite journal |title=Fossils of Cyanobacteria in CI1 Carbonaceous Meteorites: Implications to Life on Comets, Europa, and Enceladus |last=Hoover |first=Richard B. |journal=Journal of Cosmology |volume=13 |pages=xxx |year=2011 |url=http://journalofcosmology.com/Life100.html |accessdate=2011-03-06 }}</ref> However, NASA distanced itself from Hoover's claim and his lack of expert peer-reviews.<ref> {{cite news | first = Kerry Sheridan | title = NASA shoots down alien fossil claims | date = 7 March 2011 | url = http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/03/08/3157645.htm | work = ABC News | accessdate = 2011-03-07}}</ref><ref name=Borenstein>{{cite web |last=Borenstein |first=Seth |title=Scientists skeptical of meteorite alien life claim |url=http://www.starnewsonline.com/article/20110307/APA/1103071081 |publisher=[[Associated Press]] (on [http://www.starnewsonline.com Starnewsonline.com]) |date=7 March 2011 |accessdate=2011-03-07 }}</ref><ref name="Redfield">{{cite web |last=Redfield |first=Rosemary |title=Is this claim of bacteria in a meteorite any better than the 1996 one? |work=[http://rrresearch.blogspot.com/ RR Research blog] |date=6 March 2011 |url=http://rrresearch.blogspot.com/2011/03/is-this-claim-of-bacteria-in-meteorite.html |accessdate=7 March 2011 }}</ref>
{{As of|2010}}, no proof of extraterrestrial life has been identified. Examination of the [[ALH 84001]] meteorite, which was recovered in [[Antarctica]] in 1984 and believed to have originated from [[Mars]], is thought by [[David S. McKay|David McKay]], Chief Scientist for Astrobiology at [[NASA]]'s [[Johnson Space Center]], as well as other scientists, to contain [[Fossil#Microfossils|microfossils]] of extraterrestrial origin; this interpretation is controversial.<ref name=disbelief>{{cite web |title=Experts: Little Evidence of Life on Mars | url=http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2006/08/08/marslife_spa.html?category=space&guid=20060808100030 |last=Crenson |first=Matt |publisher=[[Associated Press]] (on [http://dsc.discovery.com discovery.com]) |date=2006-08-06 |accessdate=2011-03-08 }}</ref><ref name="life">{{cite journal|title= Search for past life on Mars: Possible relic biogenic activity in Martian meteorite ALH84001|author= McKay DS, Gibson EK, ThomasKeprta KL, Vali H, Romanek CS, Clemett SJ, Chillier XDF, Maechling CR, Zare RN |journal=Science|volume= 273|pages=924–930|year=1996|doi= 10.1126/science.273.5277.924|pmid= 8688069|issue= 5277}}</ref><ref name="jsc2009">http://www.nasa.gov/centers/johnson/pdf/403089main_7441-1.pdf</ref><ref name=McKay>{{cite journal |title=Life on Mars: new evidence from martian meteorites |author=McKay DS, Thomas-Keprta KL, Clemett, SJ, Gibson, EK Jr, Spencer L, Wentworth SJ |journal=[[Proc. SPIE]] |volume=7441 |year=2009 |url=http://spiedigitallibrary.org/proceedings/resource/2/psisdg/7441/1/744102_1?isAuthorized=no |doi=10.1117/12.832317 |accessdate=2011-03-08 }}</ref> On 5 March 2011, [[Richard B. Hoover]], a scientist with the [[Marshall Space Flight Center]], speculates on the finding of alleged microfossils similar to [[cyanobacteria]] in [[CI1 fossils|CI1]] carbonaceous [[meteorites]].<ref name=Tenney>{{cite web |last=Tenney |first=Garrett |title=Exclusive: NASA Scientist Claims Evidence of Alien Life on Meteorite |url=http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/03/05/exclusive-nasa-scientists-claims-evidence-alien-life-meteorite/ |publisher=[[FoxNews]] |date=5 March 2011 |accessdate=2011-03-06 }}</ref><ref name=Hoover>{{cite journal |title=Fossils of Cyanobacteria in CI1 Carbonaceous Meteorites: Implications to Life on Comets, Europa, and Enceladus |last=Hoover |first=Richard B. |journal=Journal of Cosmology |volume=13 |pages=xxx |year=2011 |url=http://journalofcosmology.com/Life100.html |accessdate=2011-03-06 }}</ref> However, NASA distanced itself from Hoover's claim and his lack of expert peer-reviews.<ref> {{cite news | first = Kerry Sheridan | title = NASA shoots down alien fossil claims | date = 7 March 2011 | url = http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/03/08/3157645.htm | work = ABC News | accessdate = 2011-03-07}}</ref><ref name=Borenstein>{{cite web |last=Borenstein |first=Seth |title=Scientists skeptical of meteorite alien life claim |url=http://www.starnewsonline.com/article/20110307/APA/1103071081 |publisher=[[Associated Press]] (on [http://www.starnewsonline.com Starnewsonline.com]) |date=7 March 2011 |accessdate=2011-03-07 }}</ref><ref name="Redfield">{{cite web |last=Redfield |first=Rosemary |title=Is this claim of bacteria in a meteorite any better than the 1996 one? |work=[http://rrresearch.blogspot.com/ RR Research blog] |date=6 March 2011 |url=http://rrresearch.blogspot.com/2011/03/is-this-claim-of-bacteria-in-meteorite.html |accessdate=7 March 2011 }}</ref> According to American astrophysicist [[Neil deGrasse Tyson]]: "At the moment, life on Earth is the only known life in the Universe, but there are compelling 'arguments' to suggest we are not alone."<ref>{{cite web | url = http://astrobiology.nasa.gov/articles/the-search-for-life-in-the-universe/ | title = The Search for Life in the Universe | accessdate = 2011-03-07 | first = Neil deGrasse Tyson | date = 23 July 2001 | work = Department of Astrophysics and Hayden Planetarium | publisher = NASA}}</ref>


;Methane
;Methane

Revision as of 15:46, 8 March 2011

Nucleic acids may not be the only biomolecules in the universe capable of coding for life.[1]

Astrobiology (or exobiology) is the study of the origin, evolution, distribution, and future of life in the universe, besides Earth. This interdisciplinary field encompasses the search for habitable environments in our Solar System and habitable planets outside our Solar System, the search for evidence of prebiotic chemistry, laboratory and field research into the origins and early evolution of life on Earth, and studies of the potential for life to adapt to challenges on Earth and in outer space.[2]

Astrobiology makes use of physics, chemistry, astronomy, biology, molecular biology, ecology, planetary science, geography, and geology to investigate the possibility of life on other worlds and help recognize biospheres that might be different from the biosphere on Earth.[3][4] Astrobiology concerns itself with interpretation of existing scientific data; given more detailed and reliable data from other parts of the universe, the roots of astrobiology itself—physics, chemistry and biology—may have their theoretical bases challenged. Although speculation is entertained to give context, astrobiology concerns itself primarily with hypotheses that fit firmly into existing scientific theories. Earth is the only place in the universe known to harbor life and there is no conclusive evidence of life beyond our planetary system.[5][6]

Overview

It is not known whether life elsewhere in the universe would utilize cell structures like those found on Earth. (Chloroplasts within plant cells shown here.)[7]
The Martian meteorite ALH84001 shows microscopic formations that may have been created by life.

Astrobiology is etymologically derived from the Greek ἄστρον, astron, "constellation, star"; βίος, bios, "life"; and -λογία, -logia, study. The synonyms of Astrobiology are diverse; however, the synonyms were structured in relation to the most important sciences implied in its development: astronomy and biology. A synonym is exobiology from the Greek Έξω, "external"; Βίος, bios, "life"; and λογία, -logia, study. Another term used in the past is xenobiology, ("biology of the foreigners") a word coined in 1954 by science fiction writer Robert Heinlein in his work The Star Beast.[8]

While it is an emerging and developing field, the question of whether life exists elsewhere in the universe is a verifiable hypothesis and thus a valid line of scientific inquiry. Though once considered outside the mainstream of scientific inquiry, astrobiology has become a formalized field of study. Planetary scientist David Grinspoon calls astrobiology a field of natural philosophy, grounding speculation on the unknown, in known scientific theory.[9] NASA's interest in exobiology first began with the development of the U.S. Space Program. In 1959, NASA funded its first exobiology project, and in 1960, NASA founded an Exobiology Program; Exobiology research is now one of four elements of NASA's current Astrobiology Program.[2][10] In 1971, NASA funded the Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence (SETI) to search radio frequencies of the electromagnetic spectrum for signals being transmitted by extraterrestrial life outside the Solar System. NASA's Viking missions to Mars, launched in 1976, included three biology experiments designed to look for possible signs of present life on Mars. The Mars Pathfinder lander in 1997 carried a scientific payload intended for exopaleontology in the hopes of finding microbial fossils entombed in the rocks.[11]

In the 21st century, astrobiology is a focus of a growing number of NASA and European Space Agency Solar System exploration missions. The first European workshop on astrobiology took place in May 2001 in Italy,[12] and the outcome was the Aurora programme.[13] Currently, NASA hosts the NASA Astrobiology Institute and a growing number of universities in the United States (e.g., University of Arizona, Penn State University, Montana State University, University of Washington, and Arizona State University[14]), Britain (e.g., The University of Glamorgan[15]), Canada, Ireland, and Australia (e.g., The University of New South Wales[16]) now offer graduate degree programs in astrobiology. The International Astronomical Union regularly organizes international conferences through its Bioastronomy Comission.[17]

Advancements in the fields of astrobiology, observational astronomy and discovery of large varieties of extremophiles with extraordinary capability to thrive in the harshest environments on Earth, have led to speculation that life may possibly be thriving on many of the extraterrestrial bodies in the universe. A particular focus of current astrobiology research is the search for life on Mars due to its proximity to Earth and geological history. There is a growing body of evidence to suggest that Mars has previously had a considerable amount of water on its surface, water being considered an essential precursor to the development of carbon-based life.[18]

Missions specifically designed to search for life include the Viking program and Beagle 2 probes, both directed to Mars. The Viking results were inconclusive,[19] and Beagle 2 failed to transmit from the surface and is assumed to have crashed.[20] A future mission with a strong astrobiology role would have been the Jupiter Icy Moons Orbiter, designed to study the frozen moons of Jupiter—some of which may have liquid water—had it not been cancelled. Recently, the Phoenix lander probed the environment for past and present planetary habitability of microbial life on Mars, and to research the history of water there.

In 2011, NASA plans to launch the Mars Science Laboratory rover which will continue the search for past or present life on Mars using a variety of scientific instruments. The European Space Agency has been developing the ExoMars astrobiology rover, which is to be launched in 2018.

Methodology

Planetary habitability

When looking for life on other planets, some simplifying assumptions are useful to reduce the size of the task of the astrobiologist. One is to assume that the vast majority of life forms in our galaxy are based on carbon chemistries, as are all life forms on Earth.[21] While it is possible that non-carbon-based life forms exist, carbon is well known for the unusually wide variety of molecules that can be formed around it. Carbon is the fourth most abundant element in the universe and the energy required to make or break a bond is just at an appropriate level for building molecules which are not only stable, but also reactive. The fact that carbon atoms bond readily to other carbon atoms allows for the building of arbitrarily long and complex molecules.

The presence of liquid water is a useful assumption, as it is a common molecule and provides an excellent environment for the formation of complicated carbon-based molecules that could eventually lead to the emergence of life.[22] Some researchers posit environments of ammonia, or more likely, water-ammonia mixtures.[23]

A third assumption is to focus on sun-like stars. This comes from the idea of planetary habitability.[24] Very big stars have relatively short lifetimes, meaning that life would not likely have time to evolve on planets orbiting them. Very small stars provide so little heat and warmth that only planets in very close orbits around them would not be frozen solid, and in such close orbits these planets would be tidally "locked" to the star.[25] Without a thick atmosphere, one side of the planet would be perpetually baked and the other perpetually frozen. In 2005, the question was brought back to the attention of the scientific community, as the long lifetimes of red dwarfs could allow some biology on planets with thick atmospheres. This is significant, as red dwarfs are extremely common. (See Habitability of red dwarf systems).

It is estimated that 10% of the stars in our galaxy are sun-like; There are about a thousand such stars within 100 light-years of our Sun. These stars would be useful primary targets for interstellar listening. Since Earth is the only planet known to harbor life, there is no evident way to know if any of the simplifying assumptions are correct.

Elements of astrobiology

Astronomy

Artist's impression of the extrasolar planet OGLE-2005-BLG-390Lb orbiting its star 20,000 light-years from Earth; this planet was discovered with gravitational microlensing.
The NASA Kepler mission, launched in March 2009, searches for extrasolar planets

Most astronomy-related astrobiological research falls into the category of extrasolar planet (exoplanet) detection, the hypothesis being that if life arose on Earth, then it could also arise on other planets with similar characteristics. To that end, a number of instruments designed to detect Earth-like exoplanets are under development, most notably NASA's Terrestrial Planet Finder (TPF) and ESA's Darwin programs. Additionally, NASA has launched the Kepler mission in March 2009, and the French Space Agency has launched the COROT space mission in 2006.[26][27] There are also several less ambitious ground-based efforts underway. (See exoplanet).

The goal of these missions is not only to detect Earth-sized planets, but also to directly detect light from the planet so that it may be studied spectroscopically. By examining planetary spectra, it would be possible to determine the basic composition of an extrasolar planet's atmosphere and/or surface; given this knowledge, it may be possible to assess the likelihood of life being found on that planet. A NASA research group, the Virtual Planet Laboratory,[28] is using computer modeling to generate a wide variety of virtual planets to see what they would look like if viewed by TPF or Darwin. It is hoped that once these missions come online, their spectra can be cross-checked with these virtual planetary spectra for features that might indicate the presence of life. The photometry temporal variability of extrasolar planets may also provide clues to their surface and atmospheric properties.

An estimate for the number of planets with intelligent extraterrestrial life can be gleaned from the Drake equation, essentially an equation expressing the probability of intelligent life as the product of factors such as the fraction of planets that might be habitable and the fraction of planets on which life might arise:[29]
where, N = The number of communicative civilizations, R* = The rate of formation of suitable stars (stars such as our Sun), fp = The fraction of those stars with planets. (Current evidence indicates that planetary systems may be common for stars like the Sun), ne = The number of Earth-like worlds per planetary system, fl = The fraction of those Earth-like planets where life actually develops, fi = The fraction of life sites where intelligence develops, fc = The fraction of communicative planets (those on which electromagnetic communications technology develops), L = The "lifetime" of communicating civilizations.

However, whilst the rationale behind the equation is sound, it is unlikely that the equation will be constrained to reasonable error limits any time soon. The first term, Number of Stars, is generally constrained within a few orders of magnitude. The second and third terms, Stars with Planets and Planets with Habitable Conditions, are being evaluated for the sun's neighborhood. The problem of the formula is that it is not usable to emit hypothesis because it contains units that can never be verified. It has permitted that the applications of the formula had been related to simplistic or pseudoscientific arguments.[30] Another associated topic is the Fermi paradox, which suggests that if intelligent life is common in the universe, then there should be obvious signs of it. This is the purpose of projects like SETI, which tries to detect signs of radio transmissions from intelligent extraterrestrial civilizations.

Another active research area in astrobiology is Planetary system formation. It has been suggested that the peculiarities of our Solar System (for example, the presence of Jupiter as a protective shield[31]) may have greatly increased the probability of intelligent life arising on our planet.[32][33] No firm conclusions have been reached so far.

Biology

Hydrothermal vents are able to support extremophile bacteria on Earth and may also support life in other parts of the cosmos.

Biology and chemistry, as opposed to physics, do not admit ideological contexts: either the biological phenomena are real, or they are abstract. Biologists cannot say that a process or phenomenon, by being mathematically possible, have to exist forcibly in the real nature. For biologists, the ground of speculations is well noticeable, and biologists specify what is speculative and what is not.[30]

Until the 1970s, life was believed to be entirely dependent on energy from the Sun. Plants on Earth's surface capture energy from sunlight to photosynthesize sugars from carbon dioxide and water, releasing oxygen in the process, and are then eaten by oxygen-respiring animals, passing their energy up the food chain. Even life in the ocean depths, where sunlight cannot reach, was believed to obtain its nourishment either from consuming organic detritus rained down from the surface waters or from eating animals that did.[34] A world's ability to support life was thought to depend on its access to sunlight. However, in 1977, during an exploratory dive to the Galapagos Rift in the deep-sea exploration submersible Alvin, scientists discovered colonies of giant tube worms, clams, crustaceans, mussels, and other assorted creatures clustered around undersea volcanic features known as black smokers.[34] These creatures thrive despite having no access to sunlight, and it was soon discovered that they comprise an entirely independent food chain. Instead of plants, the basis for this food chain is a form of bacterium that derives its energy from oxidization of reactive chemicals, such as hydrogen or hydrogen sulfide, that bubble up from the Earth's interior. This chemosynthesis revolutionized the study of biology by revealing that life need not be sun-dependent; it only requires water and an energy gradient in order to exist.

Extremophiles (organisms able to survive in extreme environments) are a core research element for astrobiologists. Such organisms include biota able to survive kilometers below the ocean's surface near hydrothermal vents and microbes that thrive in highly acidic environments.[35] It is now known that extremophiles thrive in ice, boiling water, acid, the water core of nuclear reactors, salt crystals, toxic waste and in a range of other extreme habitats that were previously thought to be inhospitable for life.[36] It opened up a new avenue in astrobiology by massively expanding the number of possible extraterrestrial habitats. Characterization of these organisms—their environments and their evolutionary pathways—is considered a crucial component to understanding how life might evolve elsewhere in the universe. Some organisms able to withstand exposure to the vacuum and radiation of space include the lichen fungi Rhizocarpon geographicum and Xanthoria elegans,[37] the bacterium Bacillus safensis,[38] Deinococcus radiodurans,[38] Bacillus subtilis,[38] yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae,[38] seeds from Arabidopsis thaliana ('mouse-ear cress'),[38] as well as the invertebrate animal Tardigrade.[38]

On 2 December 2010, it was announced that an extremophile bacterium (GFAJ-1) can be coaxed into partially substituting arsenic for phosphorus in some of its basic chemistry under laboratory conditions.[39] This discovery gives weight to the long-standing idea that life on other planets may have a radically different chemical makeup and may help in the search for alien life.[39][40]

The origin of life, distinct from the evolution of life, is another ongoing field of research. Oparin and Haldane postulated that the conditions on the early Earth were conducive to the formation of organic compounds from inorganic elements and thus to the formation of many of the chemicals common to all forms of life we see today. The study of this process, known as prebiotic chemistry, has made some progress, but it is still unclear whether or not life could have formed in such a manner on Earth. The alternative theory of panspermia is that the first elements of life may have formed on another planet with even more favorable conditions (or even in interstellar space, asteroids, etc.) and then have been carried over to Earth by a variety of means. Jupiter's moon, Europa, is now considered to be the most likely location for extant extraterrestrial life in the Solar System.[36][41][42][43][44][45]

Astrogeology

Astrogeology is a planetary science discipline concerned with the geology of the celestial bodies such as the planets and their moons, asteroids, comets, and meteorites. The information gathered by this discipline allows the measure of a planet's or a natural satellite's potential to develop and sustain life, or planetary habitability.

An additional discipline of astrogeology is geochemistry, which involves study of the chemical composition of the Earth and other planets, chemical processes and reactions that govern the composition of rocks and soils, the cycles of matter and energy and their interaction with the hydrosphere and the atmosphere of the planet. Specializations include cosmochemistry, biochemistry and organic geochemistry.

The fossil record provides the oldest known evidence for life on Earth.[46] By examining this evidence, paleontologists are able to understand better the types of organisms that arose on the early Earth. Some regions on Earth, such as the Pilbara in Western Australia and the McMurdo Dry Valleys of Antarctica, are also considered to be geological analogs to regions of Mars, and as such, might be able to provide clues on how to search for past life on Mars.

Life in the Solar System

Europa, due to the ocean that exists under its icy surface, might host some form of microbial life.

People have long speculated about the possibility of life in settings other than Earth, however, speculation on the nature of life elsewhere often has paid little heed to constraints imposed by the nature of biochemistry.[47] The likelihood that life throughout the universe is probably carbon-based is encouraged by the fact that carbon is one of the most abundant of the higher elements. Only two of the natural atoms, carbon and silicon, are known to serve as the backbones of molecules sufficiently large to carry biological information. As the structural basis for life, one of carbon's important features is that unlike silicon it can readily engage in the formation of chemical bonds with many other atoms, thereby allowing for the chemical versatility required to conduct the reactions of biological metabolism and propagation. The various organic functional groups, composed of hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, and a host of metals, such as iron, magnesium, and zinc, provide the enormous diversity of chemical reactions necessarily catalyzed by a living organism. Silicon, in contrast, interacts with only a few other atoms, and the large silicon molecules are monotonous compared with the combinatorial universe of organic macromolecules.[47][30] Indeed, it seems likely that the basic building blocks of life anywhere will be similar to our own, in the generality if not in the detail.[47] Although terrestrial life and life that might arise independently of Earth are expected to use many similar, if not identical, building blocks, they also are expected to have some biochemical qualities that are unique. If life has had a comparable impact elsewhere in the solar system, the relative abundances of chemicals key for its survival - whatever they may be - could betray its presence. Whatever extraterrestrial life may be, its tendency to chemically alter its environment might just give it away.[48] Thought on where in the Solar System life might occur was limited historically by the belief that life relies ultimately on light and warmth from the Sun and, therefore, is restricted to the surfaces of planets.[47] The three most likely candidates for life in the Solar System are the planet Mars, the Jovian moon Europa, and Saturn's moon Titan.[49][50][51][52][53] This speculation is primarily based on the fact that (in the cases of Mars and Europa) the planetary bodies may have liquid water, a molecule essential for life as we know it, for its use as a solvent in cells.[18] Water on Mars is found in its polar ice caps, and newly carved gullies recently observed on Mars suggest that liquid water may exist, at least transiently, on the planet's surface,[54][55] and possibly in subsurface environments such as hydrothermal springs as well. At the Martian low temperatures and low pressure, liquid water is likely to be highly saline.[56] As for Europa, liquid water likely exists beneath the moon's icy outer crust.[42][49][50] This water may be warmed to a liquid state by volcanic vents on the ocean floor (an especially intriguing theory considering the various types of extremophiles that live near Earth's volcanic vents), but the primary source of heat is probably tidal heating.[57]

Another planetary body that could potentially sustain extraterrestrial life is Saturn's largest moon, Titan.[53] Titan has been described as having conditions similar to those of early Earth.[58] On its surface, scientists have discovered the first liquid lakes outside of Earth, but they seem to be composed of ethane and/or methane, not water.[59] After Cassini data was studied, it was reported on March 2008 that Titan may also have an underground ocean composed of liquid water and ammonia.[60] Additionally, Saturn's moon Enceladus may have an ocean below its icy surface.[61]

Rare Earth hypothesis

This hypothesis states that based on astrobiological findings, multi-cellular life forms found on Earth may actually be more of a rarity than scientists initially assumed. It provides a possible answer to the Fermi paradox which suggests, "If extraterrestrial aliens are common, why aren't they obvious?" It is apparently in opposition to the principle of mediocrity, assumed by famed astronomers Frank Drake, Carl Sagan, and others. The Principle of Mediocrity suggests that life on Earth is not exceptional, but rather that life is more than likely to be found on innumerable other worlds.

The anthropic principle states that fundamental laws of the universe work specifically in a way that life would be possible. The anthropic principle supports the Rare Earth Hypothesis by arguing the overall elements that are needed to support life on Earth are so fine-tuned that it is nigh impossible for another just like it to exist by random chance (note that these terms are used by scientists in a different way from the vernacular conception of them). However, Stephen Jay Gould compared the claim that the universe is fine-tuned for the benefit of our kind of life to saying that sausages were made long and narrow so that they could fit into modern hot dog buns, or saying that ships had been invented to house barnacles.[62][63]

Research

The systematic search for possible life outside of Earth is a valid multidisciplinary scientific endeavor.[64] The University of Glamorgan, UK, started just such a degree in 2006,[15] and the American government funds the NASA Astrobiology Institute. However, characterization of non-Earth life is unsettled; hypotheses and predictions as to its existence and origin vary widely, but at the present, the development of theories to inform and support the exploratory search for life may be considered astrobiology's most concrete practical application.

Biologist Jack Cohen and mathematician Ian Stewart, amongst others, consider xenobiology separate from astrobiology. Cohen and Stewart stipulate that astrobiology is the search for Earth-like life outside of our solar system and say that xenobiologists are concerned with the possibilities open to us once we consider that life need not be carbon-based or oxygen-breathing, so long as it has the defining characteristics of life. (See carbon chauvinism).

Research outcomes

Asteroid(s) may have transported life to Earth.

As of 2010, no proof of extraterrestrial life has been identified. Examination of the ALH 84001 meteorite, which was recovered in Antarctica in 1984 and believed to have originated from Mars, is thought by David McKay, Chief Scientist for Astrobiology at NASA's Johnson Space Center, as well as other scientists, to contain microfossils of extraterrestrial origin; this interpretation is controversial.[65][66][67][68] On 5 March 2011, Richard B. Hoover, a scientist with the Marshall Space Flight Center, speculates on the finding of alleged microfossils similar to cyanobacteria in CI1 carbonaceous meteorites.[69][70] However, NASA distanced itself from Hoover's claim and his lack of expert peer-reviews.[71][72][73] According to American astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson: "At the moment, life on Earth is the only known life in the Universe, but there are compelling 'arguments' to suggest we are not alone."[74]

Methane

In 2004, the spectral signature of methane was detected in the Martian atmosphere by both Earth-based telescopes as well as by the Mars Express probe. Because of solar radiation and cosmic radiation, methane is predicted to disappear from the Martian atmosphere within several years, so the gas must be actively replenished in order to maintain the present concentration.[75][76] The Mars Science Laboratory rover will perform precision measurements of oxygen and carbon isotope ratios in carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) in the atmosphere of Mars in order to distinguish between a geochemical and a biological origin.[77][78][79]

Planetary systems

It is possible that some planets, like the gas giant Jupiter in our solar system, may have moons with solid surfaces or liquid oceans that are more hospitable. Most of the planets so far discovered outside our solar system are hot gas giants thought to be inhospitable to life, so it is not yet known whether our solar system, with a warm, rocky, metal-rich inner planet such as Earth, is of an aberrant composition. Improved detection methods and increased observing time will undoubtedly discover more planetary systems, and possibly some more like ours. For example, NASA's Kepler Mission seeks to discover Earth-sized planets around other stars by measuring minute changes in the star's light curve as the planet passes between the star and the spacecraft. Progress in infrared astronomy and submillimeter astronomy has revealed the constituents of other star systems. Infrared searches have detected belts of dust and asteroids around distant stars, underpinning the formation of planets.

Planetary habitability

Efforts to answer questions such as the abundance of potentially habitable planets in habitable zones and chemical precursors have had much success. Numerous extrasolar planets have been detected using the wobble method and transit method, showing that planets around other stars are more numerous than previously postulated. The first Earth-like extrasolar planet to be discovered within its star's habitable zone is Gliese 581 c, which was found using radial velocity.[80]

Research into the environmental limits of life and the workings of extreme ecosystems is also ongoing, enabling researchers to predict what planetary environments might be most likely to harbor life. Missions such as the Phoenix lander, Mars Science Laboratory, ExoMars to Mars, the Cassini probe to Saturn's moon Titan, and the "Ice Clipper" mission to Jupiter's moon Europa hope to further explore the possibilities of life on other planets in our solar system.

See also

References

  1. ^ "Launching the Alien Debates (part 1 of 7)". Astrobiology Magazine. NASA. 8 December 2006. Retrieved 2008-10-20.
  2. ^ a b "About Astrobiology". NASA Astrobiology Institute. NASA. 21 January 2008. Retrieved 2008-10-20.
  3. ^ iTWire - Scientists will look for alien life, but Where and How?
  4. ^ Ward, P. D. (2004). The life and death of planet Earth. New York: Owl Books. ISBN 0805075127. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  5. ^ "Extraterrestrial Life in the Universe" (PDF), NASA Technical Memorandum 102363, Lewis Research Center, Ohio: NASA, February 1990, retrieved 2011-03-08 {{citation}}: |first= missing |last= (help); |format= requires |url= (help)
  6. ^ Jonathan I. Lunine, Raymond Jeanloz. "Earth". History.com. Retrieved 2011-03-07.
  7. ^ Gutro, Robert (4 November 2007). "NASA Predicts Non-Green Plants on Other Planets". Goddard Space Flight Center. Retrieved 2008-10-20.
  8. ^ Heinlein R and Harold W (21 July 1961). "Xenobiology". Science: 223 and 225. Retrieved 2011-01-16.
  9. ^ Grinspoon 2004
  10. ^ Steven J. Dick and James E. Strick (2004). The Living Universe: NASA and the Development of Astrobiology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  11. ^ "Exopaleontology at the Pathfinder Landing Site". NASA Ames Research Center. 5 September 1996. Retrieved 2009-11-21. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Cite uses deprecated parameter |authors= (help)
  12. ^ "First European Workshop on Exo/Astrobiology". ESA Press Release. European Space Agency. 2001. Retrieved 2008-10-20.
  13. ^ "ESA Embraces Astrobiology". Science. 292 (5522): 1626-1627. 1 June 2001. doi:10.1126/science.292.5522.1626.
  14. ^ [1]
  15. ^ a b CASE Undergraduate Degrees
  16. ^ The Australian Centre for Astrobiology, University of New South Wales
  17. ^ Commission 51: Bioastronomy
  18. ^ a b NOVA | Mars | Life's Little Essential | PBS
  19. ^ Klein HP and Levin GV (1 October 1976). "The Viking Biological Investigation: Preliminary Results". Science. 194 (4260): 99–105. doi:10.1126/science.194.4260.99. PMID 17793090. Retrieved 2008-08-15.
  20. ^ "Possible evidence found for Beagle 2 location". European Space Agency. 21 December 2005. Retrieved 2008-08-18.
  21. ^ "Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: An Interview With Dr. Farid Salama". Astrobiology magazine. 2000. Retrieved 2008-10-20.
  22. ^ "Astrobiology". Macmillan Science Library: Space Sciences. 2006. Retrieved 2008-10-20.
  23. ^ "The Ammonia-Oxidizing Gene". Astrobiology Magazine. 19 August 2006. Retrieved 2008-10-20. {{cite web}}: |first= missing |last= (help)
  24. ^ "Stars and Habitable Planets". Sol Company. 2007. Retrieved 2008-10-20.
  25. ^ "M Dwarfs: The Search for Life is On". Red Orbit & Astrobiology Magazine. 29 August 2005. Retrieved 2008-10-20.
  26. ^ "Kepler Mission". NASA. 2008. Retrieved 2008-10-20.
  27. ^ "The COROT space telescope". CNES. 2008-10-17. Retrieved 2008-10-20.
  28. ^ "The Virtual Planet Laboratory". NASA. 2008. Retrieved 2008-10-20.
  29. ^ Ford, Steve (1995). "What is the Drake Equation?". SETI League. Retrieved 2008-10-20. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  30. ^ a b c "Astrobiology". Biology Cabinet. 26 September 2006. Retrieved 2011-01-17.
  31. ^ Horner, Jonathan (24 August 2007). "Jupiter: Friend or foe?". Europlanet. Retrieved 2008-10-20. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  32. ^ Jakosky, Bruce (14 September 2001). "The Role Of Astrobiology in Solar System Exploration". NASA. SpaceRef.com. Retrieved 2008-10-20. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  33. ^ Bortman, Henry (29 September 2004). "Coming Soon: "Good" Jupiters". Astrobiology Magazine. Retrieved 2008-10-20.
  34. ^ a b Chamberlin, Sean (1999). "Black Smokers and Giant Worms". Fullerton College. Retrieved 11 February 2011.
  35. ^ Carey, Bjorn (7 February 2005). "Wild Things: The Most Extreme Creatures". Live Science. Retrieved 2008-10-20.
  36. ^ a b Cavicchioli, R. (Fall 2002). "Extremophiles and the search for extraterrestrial life". Astrobiology. 2 (3): 281–92. doi:10.1089/153110702762027862. PMID 12530238. {{cite journal}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  37. ^ Article: Lichens survive in harsh environment of outer space
  38. ^ a b c d e f The Planetary Report, Volume XXIX, number 2, March/April 2009, "We make it happen! Who will survive? Ten hardy organisms selected for the LIFE project, by Amir Alexander
  39. ^ a b "Arsenic-loving bacteria may help in hunt for alien life". BBC News. 2 December 2010. Retrieved 2010-12-02. {{cite news}}: |first= missing |last= (help)
  40. ^ "Arsenic-Eating Bacteria Opens New Possibilities for Alien Life". Space.com. Space.com. 2 December 2010. Retrieved 2010-12-02. {{cite news}}: |first= missing |last= (help)
  41. ^ "Jupiter's Moon Europa Suspected Of Fostering Life" (PDF). Daily University Science News. 2002. Retrieved 2009-08-08.
  42. ^ a b Weinstock, Maia (24 August 2000). "Galileo Uncovers Compelling Evidence of Ocean On Jupiter's Moon Europa". Space.com. Retrieved 2008-10-20. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  43. ^ Cavicchioli, R. (Fall 2002). "Extremophiles and the search for extraterrestrial life". Astrobiology. 2 (3): :281–92. doi:10.1089/153110702762027862. PMID 12530238. {{cite journal}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  44. ^ David, Leonard (7 February 2006). "Europa Mission: Lost In NASA Budget". Space.com. Retrieved 2009-08-08. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  45. ^ "Clues to possible life on Europa may lie buried in Antarctic ice". Marshal Space Flight Center. NASA. 5 March 1998. Retrieved 2009-08-08. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  46. ^ "Fossil SUccession". U.S. Geological Survey. 14 August 1997. Retrieved 2008-10-20.
  47. ^ a b c d Pace, Norman R. (30 January 2001). "The universal nature of biochemistry". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 98 (3): 805–808. doi:10.1073/pnas.98.3.805. PMC 33372. PMID 11158550. Retrieved 2010-03-20. {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  48. ^ "Telltale chemistry could betray ET". New Scientists. 21 January 2011. Retrieved 2011-01-22. {{cite news}}: |first= missing |last= (help)
  49. ^ a b Tritt, Charles S. (2002). "Possibility of Life on Europa". MilwaukeeSchool of Engineering. Retrieved 2008-10-20.
  50. ^ a b Friedman, Louis (14 December 2005). "Projects: Europa Mission Campaign". The Planetary Society. Retrieved 2008-10-20.
  51. ^ David, Leonard (10 November 1999). "Move Over Mars -- Europa Needs Equal Billing". Space.com. Retrieved 2008-10-20.
  52. ^ Than, Ker (28 February 2007). "New Instrument Designed to Sift for Life on Mars". Space.com. Retrieved 2008-10-20.
  53. ^ a b Than, Ker (13 September 2005). "Scientists Reconsider Habitability of Saturn's Moon". Science.com. Retrieved 11 February 2011. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  54. ^ "NASA Images Suggest Water Still Flows in Brief Spurts on Mars". NASA. 2006. Retrieved 2008-10-20. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  55. ^ "Water ice in crater at Martian north pole". European Space Agency. 28 July 2005. Retrieved 2008-10-20. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  56. ^ Landis, Geoffrey A. (1 June 2001). "Martian Water: Are There Extant Halobacteria on Mars?". Astrobiology. 1 (2): 161–164. doi:10.1089/153110701753198927. PMID 12467119. Retrieved 2008-10-20. {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  57. ^ Kruszelnicki, Karl (5 November 2001). "Life on Europa, Part 1". ABC Science. Retrieved 2008-10-20. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  58. ^ "Titan: Life in the Solar System?". BBC - Science & Nature. Retrieved 2008-10-20. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  59. ^ Britt, Robert Roy (28 July 2006). "Lakes Found on Saturn's Moon Titan". Space.com. Retrieved 2008-10-20. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  60. ^ Lovett, Richard A. (20 March 2008). "Saturn Moon Titan May Have Underground Ocean". National Geographic News. Retrieved 2008-10-20. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  61. ^ "Saturn moon 'may have an ocean'". BBC News. 2006-03-10. Retrieved 2008-08-05.
  62. ^ Gould, Stephen Jay (1998). "Clear Thinking in the Sciences". Lectures at Harvard University. {{cite conference}}: Unknown parameter |booktitle= ignored (|book-title= suggested) (help)
  63. ^ Gould, Stephen Jay (2002). Why People Believe Weird Things: Pseudoscience, Superstition, and Other Confusions of Our Time.
  64. ^ NASA Astrobiology Institute
  65. ^ Crenson, Matt (2006-08-06). "Experts: Little Evidence of Life on Mars". Associated Press (on discovery.com). Retrieved 2011-03-08. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help)
  66. ^ McKay DS, Gibson EK, ThomasKeprta KL, Vali H, Romanek CS, Clemett SJ, Chillier XDF, Maechling CR, Zare RN (1996). "Search for past life on Mars: Possible relic biogenic activity in Martian meteorite ALH84001". Science. 273 (5277): 924–930. doi:10.1126/science.273.5277.924. PMID 8688069.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  67. ^ http://www.nasa.gov/centers/johnson/pdf/403089main_7441-1.pdf
  68. ^ McKay DS, Thomas-Keprta KL, Clemett, SJ, Gibson, EK Jr, Spencer L, Wentworth SJ (2009). "Life on Mars: new evidence from martian meteorites". Proc. SPIE. 7441. doi:10.1117/12.832317. Retrieved 2011-03-08.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  69. ^ Tenney, Garrett (5 March 2011). "Exclusive: NASA Scientist Claims Evidence of Alien Life on Meteorite". FoxNews. Retrieved 2011-03-06.
  70. ^ Hoover, Richard B. (2011). "Fossils of Cyanobacteria in CI1 Carbonaceous Meteorites: Implications to Life on Comets, Europa, and Enceladus". Journal of Cosmology. 13: xxx. Retrieved 2011-03-06.
  71. ^ "NASA shoots down alien fossil claims". ABC News. 7 March 2011. Retrieved 2011-03-07. {{cite news}}: |first= missing |last= (help)
  72. ^ Borenstein, Seth (7 March 2011). "Scientists skeptical of meteorite alien life claim". Associated Press (on Starnewsonline.com). Retrieved 2011-03-07. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help)
  73. ^ Redfield, Rosemary (6 March 2011). "Is this claim of bacteria in a meteorite any better than the 1996 one?". RR Research blog. Retrieved 7 March 2011. {{cite web}}: External link in |work= (help)
  74. ^ "The Search for Life in the Universe". Department of Astrophysics and Hayden Planetarium. NASA. 23 July 2001. Retrieved 2011-03-07. {{cite web}}: |first= missing |last= (help)
  75. ^ Vladimir A. Krasnopolsky (2005). "Some problems related to the origin of methane on Mars". Icarus. 180 (2): 359–367. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2005.10.015. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  76. ^ Planetary Fourier Spectrometer website (ESA, Mars Express)
  77. ^ "Sample Analysis at Mars (SAM) Instrument Suite". NASA. 2008. Retrieved 2008-10-09. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  78. ^ Tenenbaum, David (9 June 2008):). "Making Sense of Mars Methane". Astrobiology Magazine. Retrieved 2008-10-08. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
  79. ^ Tarsitano CG and Webster CR (2007). "Multilaser Herriott cell for planetary tunable laser spectrometers". Applied Optics,. 46 (28): 6923–6935. doi:10.1364/AO.46.006923.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
  80. ^ Than, Ker (24 April 2007). "Major Discovery: New Planet Could Harbor Water and Life". Space.com. Retrieved 2008-10-20. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)

Bibliography

  • The International Journal of Astrobiology, published by Cambridge University Press, is the forum for practitioners in this interdisciplinary field.
  • Astrobiology, published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., is a peer-reviewed journal that explores the origins of life, evolution, distribution, and destiny in the universe.
  • Dick, Steven J. (2005). The Living Universe: NASA and the Development of Astrobiology. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press. ISBN 0813537339. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Grinspoon, David (2004) [2003]. Lonely planets. The natural philosophy of alien life. New York: ECCO. ISBN 0060185406. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  • Jakosky, Bruce M. (2006). Science, Society, and the Search for Life in the Universe. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. ISBN 0816526133. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  • Lunine, Jonathan I. (2005). Astrobiology. A Multidisciplinary Approach. San Francisco: Pearson Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0805380426. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  • Gilmour, Iain (2004). An introduction to astrobiology. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. ISBN 0-521-83736-7. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Ward, Peter (2000). Rare Earth: Why Complex Life is Uncommon in the Universe. New York: Copernicus. ISBN 0387987010. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)

External links

Template:Link FA