Open scientific data: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
BlevintronBot (talk | contribs)
1,942 edits
BOT: Added an archive link; Marked dead links in 2 place(s). Please report any problems.
Line 19: Line 19:
More recent uses of the term include:
More recent uses of the term include:


* SAFARI 2000 (South Africa, 2001) used a license informed by ICSU and NASA policies <ref>http://mercury.ornl.gov/safari2k/s2kpolicy.pdf</ref>
* SAFARI 2000 (South Africa, 2001) used a license informed by ICSU and NASA policies <ref>http://mercury.ornl.gov/safari2k/s2kpolicy.pdf {{Dead link|date=April 2012|bot=BlevintronBot}}</ref>
* the human genome <ref>[http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/network/2002/04/05/kent.html Jim Kent 2002]</ref> (Kent, 2002)
* the human genome <ref>[http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/network/2002/04/05/kent.html Jim Kent 2002]</ref> (Kent, 2002)
* An Open Data Consortium on geospatial data <ref>[http://www.opendataconsortium.org/newsbdy.htm Open Data Consortium ca. 2003]</ref> (2003)
* An Open Data Consortium on geospatial data <ref>[http://www.opendataconsortium.org/newsbdy.htm Open Data Consortium ca. 2003]</ref> (2003)
Line 33: Line 33:
* XTech <ref>[http://times.usefulinc.com/2005/01/05-xtech-open-data XTech 2005]</ref> (Dumbill, 2005),<ref>[http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2006/07/28/Open-Data Tim Bray and Tim O'Reilly]</ref> (Bray and O'Reilly 2006)
* XTech <ref>[http://times.usefulinc.com/2005/01/05-xtech-open-data XTech 2005]</ref> (Dumbill, 2005),<ref>[http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2006/07/28/Open-Data Tim Bray and Tim O'Reilly]</ref> (Bray and O'Reilly 2006)


In 2004, the Science Ministers of all nations of the [[OECD]] (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), which includes most developed countries of the world, signed a declaration which essentially states that all publicly-funded archive data should be made publicly available.<ref>[http://www.oecd.org/document/0,2340,en_2649_34487_25998799_1_1_1_1,00.html OECD Declaration on Open Access to publicly-funded data]</ref> Following a request and an intense discussion with data-producing institutions in member states, the OECD published in 2007 the ''OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding'' as a ''soft-law'' recommendation.<ref>[http://www.oecd.org/document/55/0,3343,en_2649_201185_38500791_1_1_1_1,00.html OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding]</ref>
In 2004, the Science Ministers of all nations of the [[OECD]] (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), which includes most developed countries of the world, signed a declaration which essentially states that all publicly-funded archive data should be made publicly available.<ref>[http://www.oecd.org/document/0,2340,en_2649_34487_25998799_1_1_1_1,00.html OECD Declaration on Open Access to publicly-funded data] {{Wayback|date=20110503233247|url=http://www.oecd.org/document/0,2340,en_2649_34487_25998799_1_1_1_1,00.html|df=yes}}</ref> Following a request and an intense discussion with data-producing institutions in member states, the OECD published in 2007 the ''OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding'' as a ''soft-law'' recommendation.<ref>[http://www.oecd.org/document/55/0,3343,en_2649_201185_38500791_1_1_1_1,00.html OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding] {{Dead link|date=April 2012|bot=BlevintronBot}}</ref>


In 2005 Edd Dumbill introduced an "Open Data" theme in XTech, including:
In 2005 Edd Dumbill introduced an "Open Data" theme in XTech, including:

Revision as of 07:42, 7 April 2012

Open science data is a type of Open data focussed on publishing observations and results of scientific activities available for anyone to analyze and reuse. While the idea of open science data has been actively promoted since the 1950s, the rise of the Internet has significantly lowered the cost and time required to publish or obtain data.

History

The concept of open access to scientific data was institutionally established with the formation of the World Data Center system, in preparation for the International Geophysical Year of 1957-1958.[1] The International Council of Scientific Unions (now the International Council for Science) established several World Data Centers to minimize the risk of data loss and to maximize data accessibility, further recommending in 1955 that data be made available in machine-readable form.[2]

In 1995 GCDIS (US) put its position clearly in On the Full and Open Exchange of Scientific Data (A publication of the Committee on Geophysical and Environmental Data - National Research Council):

"The Earth's atmosphere, oceans, and biosphere form an integrated system that transcends national boundaries. To understand the elements of the system, the way they interact, and how they have changed with time, it is necessary to collect and analyze environmental data from all parts of the world. Studies of the global environment require international collaboration for many reasons:

  • to address global issues, it is essential to have global data sets and products derived from these data sets;
  • it is more efficient and cost-effective for each nation to share its data and information than to collect everything it needs independently; and
  • the implementation of effective policies addressing issues of the global environment requires the involvement from the outset of nearly all nations of the world.

International programs for global change research and environmental monitoring crucially depend on the principle of full and open data exchange (i.e., data and information are made available without restriction, on a non-discriminatory basis, for no more than the cost of reproduction and distribution."

[3]

The last phrase highlights the traditional cost of disseminating information by print and post. It is the removal of this cost through the Internet which has made data vastly easier to disseminate technically. It is correspondingly cheaper to create, sell and control many data resources and this has led to the current concerns over non-open data.

More recent uses of the term include:

  • SAFARI 2000 (South Africa, 2001) used a license informed by ICSU and NASA policies [4]
  • the human genome [5] (Kent, 2002)
  • An Open Data Consortium on geospatial data [6] (2003)
  • Manifesto for Open Chemistry [7] (Murray-Rust and Rzepa, 2004) (2004)
  • Presentations to JISC and OAI under the title "open data" [8] (Murray-Rust, 2005)
  • Science Commons launch [9] (2004)
  • First Open Knowledge Forums (London, UK) run by the Open Knowledge Foundation (London UK) on open data in relation to civic information and geodata [10] (February and April 2005)
  • The Blue Obelisk group in chemistry (mantra: Open Data, Open Source, Open Standards) (2005) doi:10.1021/ci050400b
  • The Petition for Open Data in Crystallography is launched by the Crystallography Open Database Advisory Board.[11](2005)
  • XML Conference & Exposition 2005 [12] (Connolly 2005)
  • SPARC Open Data mailing list [13] (2005)
  • First draft of the Open Knowledge Definition explicitly references "Open Data" [14] (2005)
  • XTech [15] (Dumbill, 2005),[16] (Bray and O'Reilly 2006)

In 2004, the Science Ministers of all nations of the OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), which includes most developed countries of the world, signed a declaration which essentially states that all publicly-funded archive data should be made publicly available.[17] Following a request and an intense discussion with data-producing institutions in member states, the OECD published in 2007 the OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding as a soft-law recommendation.[18]

In 2005 Edd Dumbill introduced an "Open Data" theme in XTech, including:

In 2006 Science Commons [19] ran a 2-day conference in Washington where the primary topic could be described as Open Data. It was reported that the amount of micro-protection of data (e.g. by license) in areas such as biotechnology was creating a Tragedy of the anticommons. In this the costs of obtaining licenses from a large number of owners made it uneconomic to do research in the area.

In 2007 SPARC and Science Commons announced a consolidation and enhancement of their author addenda [20]

In 2010 the Panton Principles launched,[21] advocating Open Data in science and setting out for principles to which providers must comply to have their data Open.

In 2011 LinkedScience.org was launched to realize the approach of the Linked Open Science[22] to openly share and interconnect scientific assets like datasets, methods, tools and vocabularies.

Relation to open access

Much data is made available through scholarly publication, which now attracts intense debate under "Open Access". The Budapest Open Access Initiative (2001) coined this term:

By "open access" to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. The only constraint on reproduction and distribution, and the only role for copyright in this domain, should be to give authors control over the integrity of their work and the right to be properly acknowledged and cited.

The logic of the declaration permits re-use of the data although the term "literature" has connotations of human-readable text and can imply a scholarly publication process. In Open Access discourse the term "full-text" is often used which does not emphasize the data contained within or accompanying the publication.

Some Open Access publishers do not require the authors to assign copyright and the data associated with these publications can normally be regarded as Open Data. Some publishers have Open Access strategies where the publisher requires assignment of the copyright and where it is unclear that the data in publications can be truly regarded as Open Data.

The ALPSP and STM publishers have issued a statement about the desirability of making data freely available [23]:

Publishers recognise that in many disciplines data itself, in various forms, is now a key output of research. Data searching and mining tools permit increasingly sophisticated use of raw data. Of course, journal articles provide one ‘view’ of the significance and interpretation of that data – and conference presentations and informal exchanges may provide other ‘views’ – but data itself is an increasingly important community resource. Science is best advanced by allowing as many scientists as possible to have access to as much prior data as possible; this avoids costly repetition of work, and allows creative new integration and reworking of existing data.

and

We believe that, as a general principle, data sets, the raw data outputs of research, and sets or sub-sets of that data which are submitted with a paper to a journal, should wherever possible be made freely accessible to other scholars. We believe that the best practice for scholarly journal publishers is to separate supporting data from the article itself, and not to require any transfer of or ownership in such data or data sets as a condition of publication of the article in question.

Even though this statement was without any effect on the open availability of primary data related to publications in journals of the ALPSP and STM members. Data tables provided by the authors as supplement with a paper are still available to subscribers only.

See also

External links

References

  1. ^ Committee on Scientific Accomplishments of Earth Observations from Space, National Research Council (2008). Earth Observations from Space: The First 50 Years of Scientific Achievements. The National Academies Press. p. 6. ISBN 0309110955. Retrieved 2010-11-24.
  2. ^ World Data Center System (2009-09-18). "About the World Data Center System". NOAA, National Geophysical Data Center. Retrieved 2010-11-24.
  3. ^ On the Full and Open Exchange of Scientific Data (1995) National Research Council, Washington, DC
  4. ^ http://mercury.ornl.gov/safari2k/s2kpolicy.pdf [dead link]
  5. ^ Jim Kent 2002
  6. ^ Open Data Consortium ca. 2003
  7. ^ Peter Murray-Rust, Henry Rzepa 2004
  8. ^ "Open Data" at CERN Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI4) Peter Murray-Rust, 2005
  9. ^ Report on Science Commons Dec 2004
  10. ^ [1]
  11. ^ http://www.crystallography.net/
  12. ^ Semantic Web Data Integration with hCalendar and GRDDL; Dan Connolly | From Syntax to Semantics (XML 2005) Atlanta, GA, USA
  13. ^ SPARC Open Data Mailing list
  14. ^ [2]
  15. ^ XTech 2005
  16. ^ Tim Bray and Tim O'Reilly
  17. ^ OECD Declaration on Open Access to publicly-funded data Template:Wayback
  18. ^ OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding [dead link]
  19. ^ Science Commons in Washington 2006
  20. ^ SPARC-OAF forum
  21. ^ Launch of the Panton Principles for Open Data in Science and ‘Is It Open Data?’ Web Service
  22. ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/j.procs.2011.04.076, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/j.procs.2011.04.076 instead.
  23. ^ http://www.alpsp.org/ForceDownload.asp?id=129
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Open_scientific_data&oldid=486043463"