Paul v Germany: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
expand
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ECJ case infobox
{{Infobox ECJ case
|SubmitDate=
|short_name=Peter Paul and Others
|SubmitYear=
|chamber=Full Court
|date_decided=12 October 2004
|DecideDate=October 12
|DecideYear=2004
⚫
|case_number=C-222/02
|full_name=Peter Paul, Cornelia Sonnen-Lütte and Christel Mörkens v Bundesrepublik Deutschland
|FullName=Peter Paul, Cornelia Sonnen-Lütte and Christel Mörkens v Bundesrepublik Deutschland
|CelexID=62002C0222
|case_type=Reference for a preliminary ruling from the [[Bundesgerichtshof]]
⚫
|CaseNumber=C-222/02
|ECR_citation=[2004] ECR I-09425
|Chamber=Full court
|ECR_link=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:62002J0222:EN:HTML
|Nationality=Germany
|judges=V. Skouris (President), P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans, A. Rosas, C. Gulmann (Rapporteur), J.-P. Puissochet, R. Schintgen, F. Macken, N. Colneric, S. von Bahr, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues
|Procedural=
⚫
|advocate_general=C. Stix-Hackl
|Ruling=
|AG_link=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:62002C0222:EN:HTML
|JudgeRapporteur=C. Gulmann
⚫
|cases_cited=''Brasserie du pêcheur and Factortame'' [1996] ECR I-1029; ''Dillenkofer and Others'' [1996] ECR I-4845; ''Evans'' [2003] ECR I-14447
|Judge2=V. Skouris
|legislation_cited=Dir. 94/19/EC, Arts. 3 & 7; Dir. 77/780/EEC; Dir. 89/299/EEC; Dir. 89/646/EEC
|Judge3=P. Jann
|keywords=Credit institutions – Deposit-guarantee schemes – Directive 94/19/EC – Directives 77/780/EEC, 89/299/EEC and 89/646/EEC – Supervisory measures by the competent authority for the purposes of protecting depositors – Liability of the supervisory authorities for losses resulting from defective supervision
|Judge4=C.W.A. Timmermans
|Judge5=A. Rosas
|Judge6=J.-P. Puissochet
|Judge7=R. Schintgen
|Judge8=F. Macken
|Judge9=N. Colneric
|Judge10=S. von Bahr
|Judge11=J.N. Cunha Rodrigues
|Judge12=
|Judge13=
⚫
|AdvocateGeneral=C. Stix-Hackl
⚫
|InstrumentsCited=Brasserie du pêcheur and Factortame [1996] ECR I-1029; Dillenkofer and Others [1996] ECR I-4845; Evans [2003] ECR I-14447; Directive 94/19/EC, Arts. 3 & 7; Directive 77/780/EEC; Directive 89/299/EEC; Directive 89/646/EEC
|LegislationAffecting=
}}
}}

'''''Peter Paul and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland''''' ([2004] ECR I-09425) is a [[European Court of Justice]] case regarding the civil liability of bank regulators in a case where those regulators were alleged to have failed in their duty. As of November 2008, it is the only ECJ case to consider the Deposit Guarantee Directive (94/19/EC),<ref>Source: [[EUR-Lex]].</ref> which was one of the causes of the [[Icesave dispute]] between [[Iceland]] and the [[United Kingdom]] in late 2008.
'''''Peter Paul and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland''''' ([2004] ECR I-09425) is a [[European Court of Justice]] case regarding the civil liability of bank regulators in a case where those regulators were alleged to have failed in their duty. As of November 2008, it is the only ECJ case to consider the Deposit Guarantee Directive (94/19/EC),<ref>Source: [[EUR-Lex]].</ref> which was one of the causes of the [[Icesave dispute]] between [[Iceland]] and the [[United Kingdom]] in late 2008.


Revision as of 20:09, 9 December 2008

Paul v Germany
Decided October 12 2004
Full case namePeter Paul, Cornelia Sonnen-Lütte and Christel Mörkens v Bundesrepublik Deutschland
CaseC-222/02
CelexID62002C0222
ChamberFull court
Nationality of partiesGermany
Judge-Rapporteur
C. Gulmann
Judges
Advocate General
C. Stix-Hackl
Instruments cited
Brasserie du pêcheur and Factortame [1996] ECR I-1029; Dillenkofer and Others [1996] ECR I-4845; Evans [2003] ECR I-14447; Directive 94/19/EC, Arts. 3 & 7; Directive 77/780/EEC; Directive 89/299/EEC; Directive 89/646/EEC

Peter Paul and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland ([2004] ECR I-09425) is a European Court of Justice case regarding the civil liability of bank regulators in a case where those regulators were alleged to have failed in their duty. As of November 2008, it is the only ECJ case to consider the Deposit Guarantee Directive (94/19/EC),[1] which was one of the causes of the Icesave dispute between Iceland and the United Kingdom in late 2008.

The Court ruled that the various Directives on banking supervision did not confer rights on individuals,[2] and so individual depositors were not entitled to damages from banking supervisors if those Directives were breached. The only individual right guaranteed under European Union law was the minimum deposit insurance, covering the first 20,000 euros.[3]

References

  1. ^ Source: EUR-Lex.
  2. ^ Judgment of the Court, paras. 41, 46.
  3. ^ Judgment of the Court, para. 45.
Stub icon

This law-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paul_v_Germany&oldid=256895414"