Setoid: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SmackBot (talk | contribs)
m Standard headings &/or gen fixes. using AWB
thinko?: proof -> proposition
Line 3: Line 3:
Setoids are studied especially in [[proof theory]] and in [[type-theoretic]] [[foundations of mathematics]]. Often in mathematics, when one defines an equivalence relation on a set, one immediately forms the [[quotient set]] (turning equivalence into [[equality (mathematics)|equality]]). In contrast, setoids may be used when a difference between identity and equivalence must be maintained, often with an interpretation of [[intension]]al equality (the equality on the original set) and [[extension (semantics)|extension]]al equality (the equivalence relation, or the equality on the quotient set).
Setoids are studied especially in [[proof theory]] and in [[type-theoretic]] [[foundations of mathematics]]. Often in mathematics, when one defines an equivalence relation on a set, one immediately forms the [[quotient set]] (turning equivalence into [[equality (mathematics)|equality]]). In contrast, setoids may be used when a difference between identity and equivalence must be maintained, often with an interpretation of [[intension]]al equality (the equality on the original set) and [[extension (semantics)|extension]]al equality (the equivalence relation, or the equality on the quotient set).


In proof theory, particularly the proof theory of [[constructive mathematics]] based on the [[Curry–Howard correspondence]], one often identifies a mathematical [[proposition]] with its set of [[proof (mathematics)|proof]]s (if any). A given proposition may have many proofs, of course; according to the principle of [[proof irrelevance]], normally only the truth of the proposition matters, not which proof was used. However, the Curry–Howard correspondence can turn proofs into [[algorithm]]s, and differences between algorithms are often important. So proof theorists may prefer to identify a proof with a ''setoid'' of proofs, considering proofs equivalent if they can be converted into one another through [[beta conversion]] or the like.
In proof theory, particularly the proof theory of [[constructive mathematics]] based on the [[Curry–Howard correspondence]], one often identifies a mathematical [[proposition]] with its set of [[proof (mathematics)|proof]]s (if any). A given proposition may have many proofs, of course; according to the principle of [[proof irrelevance]], normally only the truth of the proposition matters, not which proof was used. However, the Curry–Howard correspondence can turn proofs into [[algorithm]]s, and differences between algorithms are often important. So proof theorists may prefer to identify a proposition with a ''setoid'' of proofs, considering proofs equivalent if they can be converted into one another through [[beta conversion]] or the like.


In type-theoretic foundations of mathematics, setoids may be used in a type theory that lacks quotient types to model general mathematical sets. For example, in [[Per Martin-Löf]]'s [[Intuitionistic Type Theory]], there is no type of [[real number]]s, only a type of [[regular Cauchy sequence]]s of [[rational number]]s. To do [[real analysis]] in Martin-Löf's framework, therefore, one must work with a ''setoid'' of real numbers, the type of regular Cauchy sequences equipped with the usual notion of equivalence. Typically (although it depends on the type theory used), the [[axiom of choice]] will hold for functions between types (intensional functions), but not for functions between setoids (extensional functions). The term "set" is variously used either as a synonym of "type" or as a synonym of "setoid"; see [http://www.cs.chalmers.se/Cs/Research/Logic/TypesSS05/Extra/palmgren.pdf#search=setoid] (page 9).
In type-theoretic foundations of mathematics, setoids may be used in a type theory that lacks quotient types to model general mathematical sets. For example, in [[Per Martin-Löf]]'s [[Intuitionistic Type Theory]], there is no type of [[real number]]s, only a type of [[regular Cauchy sequence]]s of [[rational number]]s. To do [[real analysis]] in Martin-Löf's framework, therefore, one must work with a ''setoid'' of real numbers, the type of regular Cauchy sequences equipped with the usual notion of equivalence. Typically (although it depends on the type theory used), the [[axiom of choice]] will hold for functions between types (intensional functions), but not for functions between setoids (extensional functions). The term "set" is variously used either as a synonym of "type" or as a synonym of "setoid"; see [http://www.cs.chalmers.se/Cs/Research/Logic/TypesSS05/Extra/palmgren.pdf#search=setoid] (page 9).

Revision as of 16:35, 17 May 2008

In mathematics, a setoid is a set (or type) equipped with an equivalence relation.

Setoids are studied especially in proof theory and in type-theoretic foundations of mathematics. Often in mathematics, when one defines an equivalence relation on a set, one immediately forms the quotient set (turning equivalence into equality). In contrast, setoids may be used when a difference between identity and equivalence must be maintained, often with an interpretation of intensional equality (the equality on the original set) and extensional equality (the equivalence relation, or the equality on the quotient set).

In proof theory, particularly the proof theory of constructive mathematics based on the Curry–Howard correspondence, one often identifies a mathematical proposition with its set of proofs (if any). A given proposition may have many proofs, of course; according to the principle of proof irrelevance, normally only the truth of the proposition matters, not which proof was used. However, the Curry–Howard correspondence can turn proofs into algorithms, and differences between algorithms are often important. So proof theorists may prefer to identify a proposition with a setoid of proofs, considering proofs equivalent if they can be converted into one another through beta conversion or the like.

In type-theoretic foundations of mathematics, setoids may be used in a type theory that lacks quotient types to model general mathematical sets. For example, in Per Martin-Löf's Intuitionistic Type Theory, there is no type of real numbers, only a type of regular Cauchy sequences of rational numbers. To do real analysis in Martin-Löf's framework, therefore, one must work with a setoid of real numbers, the type of regular Cauchy sequences equipped with the usual notion of equivalence. Typically (although it depends on the type theory used), the axiom of choice will hold for functions between types (intensional functions), but not for functions between setoids (extensional functions). The term "set" is variously used either as a synonym of "type" or as a synonym of "setoid"; see [1] (page 9).

References

External links

  • Implementation of setoids in Coq: [2]