Search results

View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
  • I've used this site for almost 10 years and it's clear from the number of times that right, wrong, real good, true etc. are put in quotation marks that...
    169 KB (24,669 words) - 04:02, 13 March 2022
  • I've started a subpage (Wikipedia_talk:Neutral_point_of_view/Killing_NPOV) for discussion of an RfC regarding the proper unbiased terms to use for killings...
    253 KB (39,488 words) - 00:50, 16 December 2023
  • ← Archive 27 | Archive 028 | Archive 29 → I know this seems ironic and unexpected, but I have seen countless times when people have cited NPOV objections...
    209 KB (32,197 words) - 16:21, 4 February 2023
  • Responding to the request for closure. To the extent that changes or clarifications to the policy are being proposed, consensus is against them. To the...
    136 KB (21,280 words) - 10:20, 16 March 2022
  • Please stop all these proposals for reform. The neutral point of view policy is a fundamental policy of Wikipedia. Yes, it is reasonable for newcomers...
    218 KB (34,820 words) - 16:20, 4 February 2023
  • Please add Template:Attribution needed to the list of templates in this policy. It's more useful than {{ASF}} (which merely expresses uncertainty whether...
    242 KB (35,915 words) - 20:42, 2 March 2023
  • Supporters of the NPOV policy include: Larry Sanger, Koyaanis Qatsi, sjc, tbc, AxelBoldt, JHK, -- April Opponents include: The Cunctator (see comments)...
    65 KB (10,598 words) - 16:20, 4 February 2023
  • NOTE: The page history for Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view prior to April 11, 2006 has been moved to this page. Archived discussions Archive_001 Discussions...
    170 KB (26,471 words) - 16:21, 4 February 2023
  • PROPOSAL REJECTED The proposal has not been accepted. Among the reasons for rejection: a substantial number of editors opposed it; The arguments that "Verifiability...
    191 KB (29,007 words) - 17:12, 22 June 2022
  • The previous wording did make it clear that we should not present a supermajority view as though a tiny minority view was equal to it. The move to remove...
    272 KB (40,491 words) - 17:05, 14 October 2021
  • It says "If this project gives equal validity to those who literally claim that the Earth is flat, or those who claim that the Holocaust never occurred"...
    80 KB (12,461 words) - 23:50, 15 December 2023
  • Bensaccount, the Undue weight section does not suggest that there is no room for its interpretation. It is clear that the criteria of the Undue weight...
    22 KB (3,683 words) - 14:14, 13 June 2006
  • To suggest that a person who is able to articulate the universal perspective on something makes it neutral is quite a thought. After giving some thought...
    43 KB (7,212 words) - 14:11, 13 June 2006
  • ← Archive 025 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 → There is a dispute regarding the Criticism section of an article on a top online game. The dispute has nearly...
    73 KB (11,323 words) - 14:58, 10 December 2021
  • (redacted edit from banned user on open proxy) No, the 1st sentence is NOT a Non sequitur (logic), the second clause is dependent on the first clause but...
    251 KB (38,398 words) - 18:37, 3 March 2023
  • NPOV has an (extremely bizarre!) pseudo-democratic conception of fairness ("undue weight") which can easily be shown by the court analogy to be extremely...
    54 KB (8,789 words) - 18:51, 29 July 2006
  • Crossfirism - the tendency of articles to give the false appearance of NPOV by including a criticism section, but then proceeding to include a point->counter-point...
    44 KB (7,334 words) - 12:30, 18 July 2021
  • The use of nested criticisms is strongly discouraged under the NPOV policy. Nested criticisms often occur when two editors who support different viewpoints...
    23 KB (3,640 words) - 14:09, 13 June 2006
  • I believe that the present NPOV policy fallaciously attempts to cover too many different aspects of journalistic integrity. First and foremost, understanding...
    129 KB (20,689 words) - 16:20, 4 February 2023
  • FYI  – Pointer to relevant discussion elsewhere. The discussion Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters#MOS:ISMCAPS badly needs to be tightened...
    76 KB (8,598 words) - 02:13, 3 December 2016
View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)