Talk:Terry Pratchett: Choosing to Die: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
reassess as C-class
Nehrams2020 (talk | contribs)
WP:FILM Assessment
Line 8: Line 8:
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = yes
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = yes
}}
}}

==WP:FILM Assessment==
The article was [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Assessment|requested for re-assessment]], and after reading the article I'd also agree that it should remain C class for now. To bring it up to B-class, see if the article can be further expanded. Further critical reviews could be added to flesh out the reception section. See if anything additional can be found on the production, music, accolades, etc. The lead should also be expanded to better summarize the article beyond the two current sentences. It's good to see so many citations, but seek out more to determine if the article can be further expanded. As a side note, citations should go directly after the punctuation to remain consistent throughout the article. --Happy editing! [[User:Nehrams2020|Nehrams2020]] ([[User talk:Nehrams2020|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nehrams2020|contrib]]) 04:44, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:44, 29 June 2011

WikiProject iconFilm: British C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

WP:FILM Assessment

The article was requested for re-assessment, and after reading the article I'd also agree that it should remain C class for now. To bring it up to B-class, see if the article can be further expanded. Further critical reviews could be added to flesh out the reception section. See if anything additional can be found on the production, music, accolades, etc. The lead should also be expanded to better summarize the article beyond the two current sentences. It's good to see so many citations, but seek out more to determine if the article can be further expanded. As a side note, citations should go directly after the punctuation to remain consistent throughout the article. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 04:44, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]