Talk:Pierre Pagé: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
closing as not moved; SI and NYT are good counterpoints to sources in the article
Line 4: Line 4:


== Requested move ==
== Requested move ==
<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top -->
{{Requested move/dated|Pierre Page}}
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of a [[WP:RM|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. ''

The result of the move request was: '''no consensus''' that sources prefer the unadorned "e". [[User:ErikHaugen|ErikHaugen]] <small>([[User talk:ErikHaugen|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/ErikHaugen|contribs]])</small> 21:24, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

----


[[Pierre Pagé]] → {{no redirect|1=Pierre Page}} –
[[Pierre Pagé]] → {{no redirect|1=Pierre Page}} –
Line 17: Line 22:
**Usage is not really "split". Five out of every six sources do not use the diacritic. I would agree with your point if the usage was 50/50, but that is the case in this discussion. [[User:Jenks24|Jenks24]] ([[User talk:Jenks24|talk]]) 10:45, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
**Usage is not really "split". Five out of every six sources do not use the diacritic. I would agree with your point if the usage was 50/50, but that is the case in this discussion. [[User:Jenks24|Jenks24]] ([[User talk:Jenks24|talk]]) 10:45, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
***50/50 would be evenly split, anything less than complete agreement is "split". Two high quality sources like SI and the NYT are more than enough to keep the status quo. [[User:Canada Hky|Canada Hky]] ([[User talk:Canada Hky|talk]]) 00:50, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
***50/50 would be evenly split, anything less than complete agreement is "split". Two high quality sources like SI and the NYT are more than enough to keep the status quo. [[User:Canada Hky|Canada Hky]] ([[User talk:Canada Hky|talk]]) 00:50, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[WP:RM|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:RM bottom -->

Revision as of 21:24, 7 June 2011

WikiProject iconBiography: Sports and Games Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the sports and games work group.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
WikiProject iconIce Hockey Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconCanada: Quebec / Sport Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian sport.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus that sources prefer the unadorned "e". ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 21:24, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pierre Pagé → Pierre Page –

  • Support The use of "Pierre Page" is verified by the sources used within the article, and "Pierre Pagé" is not supported by the sources used as references for the article. Dolovis (talk) 03:44, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The Globe and Mail and Toronto Star seem to also spell it as "Pierre Page". However Sports Illustrated [1][2] uses the accent. As does this French language Nordiques fansite [3], and this French language Quebec newspaper [4]. The New York Times uses an accent also [5].
So, it's definitely used in French, and sometimes used in English.
65.94.44.141 (talk) 14:18, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Clearly the most common name in reliable English sources. A google news archive search shows 1170 hits for "Pierre Pagé", compared to a much greater 6250 hits for "Pierre Page". Jenks24 (talk) 09:00, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Sports Illustrated and the New York Times uses the accent as do a number of others in english as well as french. In cases like this it is clearly spelled out that we should go with the diacritics. -DJSasso (talk) 12:09, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, per nom. GoodDay (talk) 11:21, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose reliable sources use the accent. When the usage is split, I see no reason to make a change for change's sake. Canada Hky (talk) 20:08, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Usage is not really "split". Five out of every six sources do not use the diacritic. I would agree with your point if the usage was 50/50, but that is the case in this discussion. Jenks24 (talk) 10:45, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      • 50/50 would be evenly split, anything less than complete agreement is "split". Two high quality sources like SI and the NYT are more than enough to keep the status quo. Canada Hky (talk) 00:50, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Pierre_Pagé&oldid=433100876"