Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia:Featured article candidates: Difference between revisions
< Template:Editnotices | Page
Content deleted Content added
sp |
test |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*Double-check for [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems|potential copyright problems]], including the inadvertent [[Wikipedia:Copy-paste|copying]] of information from other sources, and too-close [[Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing|paraphrasing]]. |
*Double-check for [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems|potential copyright problems]], including the inadvertent [[Wikipedia:Copy-paste|copying]] of information from other sources, and too-close [[Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing|paraphrasing]]. |
||
*Finally, to help resolve the FAC backlog, making it more likely that reviewers will see your nomination, please consider [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2008-04-07/Dispatches|reviewing]] existing [[WP:FAC|candidates]], especially those listed on [[User:Deckiller/FAC urgents|this template]]. Good luck! |
*Finally, to help resolve the FAC backlog, making it more likely that reviewers will see your nomination, please consider [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2008-04-07/Dispatches|reviewing]] existing [[WP:FAC|candidates]], especially those listed on [[User:Deckiller/FAC urgents|this template]]. Good luck! |
||
|
|||
}} |
}} |
Revision as of 17:18, 4 December 2010
This editnotice (for Wikipedia:Featured article candidates (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)) does not have an expiry time set. To adjust this setting, please update the |expiry= parameter. |
Wait!
Before nominating an article, please ensure it meets all the featured article criteria:
If you are unsure that the article meets these standards, Peer Review may be a more appropriate venue. The FAC delegates can remove unprepared nominations at their discretion after at least one one reviewer has suggested it be withdrawn.
|