User:GTBacchus/sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Noetica (talk | contribs)
→‎Involved parties: No thanks. "I appreciate the effort, Bacchus; but see reasons at my talkpage." The real behavioural issue is far more focused, and ArbCom involvement would be a net negative.
pure white sand
Line 1: Line 1:
This is a draft that I'll be filing with the Arbitration Committee when I've heard back from everyone and written my statement. I expect to continue working on this over the next 24 hours, at which point I'll be finished, or make some update to indicate progress. -[[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> 07:06, 20 August 2011 (UTC)


== Pmanderson (draft) ==
'''Initiated by ''' [[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> '''at''' 06:48, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

=== Involved parties ===
<!-- use {{admin|username}} if the party is an administrator -->
*{{admin|GTBacchus}}, ''filing party''
*{{userlinks|Pmanderson}}
'''Every name below this line is very tentative. This list may fluctuate wildly; I don't know. I really don't know.'''
*<s><nowiki>{{userlinks|Noetica}}</nowiki></s> Indicated a preference not to be named. <small><small>I appreciate the effort, Bacchus; but see reasons at my talkpage.–N</small></small>
*<s><nowiki>{{userlinks|Tony1}}</nowiki></s> Indicated a preference not to be named.
*<s><nowiki>{{userlinks|Ohconfucius}}</nowiki></s> Indicated a preference not to be named.
*{{userlinks|Dicklyon}}
<!-- The editor filing the case should be included as a party for purposes of notifications. -->

;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
<!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. -->

'''For now, I'm just putting links here where I've inquired with people about being listed as parties.'''

*[https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Noetica&diff=445784645&oldid=445515568 Noetica]
*[https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tony1&diff=445784647&oldid=445772225 Tony1]
*[https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ohconfucius&diff=445784648&oldid=445436373 Ohconfucius]
*[https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dicklyon&diff=445784650&oldid=445497027 Dicklyon]
*[https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pmanderson&diff=445785414&oldid=445740726 Pmanderson]

;Confirmation that other steps in [[Wikipedia:dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] have been tried
<!-- Identify prior attempts at dispute resolution here, with links/diffs to the page where the resolution took place. If prior dispute resolution has not been attempted, the reasons for this should be explained in the request for arbitration -->
*Discussion where it started [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GTBacchus&oldid=445910237 permalink], as of 8/20 8pm local. See section 32.2 ''et seq''.
*Resulting AN/I [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=445910453 permalink], as of 8/20 8pm local. See section 2.
*Previous RfC [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Pmanderson&oldid=382618426 permalink], as of 8/20 8pm local.
*Within the AN/I thread, [[User:Dicklyon]] linked to a bunch of old AN/I threads about Pmanderson's behavior. [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&action=historysubmit&diff=445614704&oldid=445614345 diff], section 12.2.2.
*Block log is already linked above.

=== Statement by Eraserhead1 ===
As pointed out in the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/MickMacNee/Evidence#In_general_civility_matters|MickMacNee arbitration case]] allowing editors who routinely break the civility guidelines is bad and causes large amounts of damage to the project as a whole. This was brought up in [http://www.economist.com/node/18007761#wikitweaks the Economist] at the beginning of the year with issues raised about the lack of civility in the project. [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/MickMacNee/Evidence#Evidence_presented_by_Guymacon_.28uninvolved.29|Further]] [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/MickMacNee/Evidence#Evidence_presented_by_Rannph.C3.A1irt.C3.AD_anaithnid|editors]] [[Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/MickMacNee/Evidence#Civility|commented]] about the projects civility issues and Arbcom made it [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/MickMacNee/Proposed_decision#Collegiality_and_prohibited_conduct|clear]] that continued incivility is incompatible with the project. [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/MickMacNee/Proposed_decision#Recidivism|Arbcom]] also made it clear that continued incivility would lead to increasingly severe sanctions. As there has been an RFC on this user specifically around civility and there has been a month block since for civility and the issues are still occurring Arbcom should look at this case. -- [[User:Eraserhead1|Eraserhead1]] &lt;[[User_talk:Eraserhead1|talk]]&gt; 21:51, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

=== Statement by {Party 2} ===

=== Statement by {Party 3} ===

=== Clerk notes ===
:''This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).''

=== Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (0/0/0/0) ===
*

Revision as of 21:51, 21 August 2011