User talk:Knight Prince - Sage Veritas

Joseph Barbera

Mr. Barbera's biography on Wikipedia contains 5 sources confirming he is of Sicilian ancestry. Your source is not reliable and therefore he should not be included on this list. Furthermore, do not revert constructive edits I have done on this list correcting grammar and structural errors. Please have at least four verifiable references confirming Mr. Barbera is Lebanese or this will be end of conversation. --XLR8TION (talk) 19:58, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Please see these verifiable links:

http://www.american.com/archive/2006/december/joseph-barbera-an-appreciation/article_print

http://www.niaf.org/research/contribution.asp

http://books.google.com/books?id=gy-FsWq_tOEC&pg=PA155&dq=joseph+barbera+sicilian#v=onepage&q=sicilian&f=false (Page 155) [Book was written by Iwao Takamoto, one of Barbera's closest friends and colleagues)

http://books.google.com/books?id=LAzWAAAAMAAJ&dq=joseph+barbera+sicilian&q=sicilian#search_anchor (Joseph Barbera's autobiography, "My life in 'toons: from Flatbush to Bedrock in under a century" By Joseph Barbera Page 128 - HE HIMSELF SAYS HE IS SICILIAN!!!!) READ!--XLR8TION (talk) 20:06, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

First off, Both my sources are Very Reliable. Who are you to say whether they are or are not reliable?! Furthermore, there is no rule that says you need 4 sources and if there was, I would have provided as many. Many sources out there state he was Lebanese. Furthermore, to use a NPOV, I stated that he was "with Lebanese and/or Italian ethnicity" That is a NPOV. So you need to accept this fact. Do not drag this into an edit war! And do not revert it!Knight Prince - Sage Veritas (talk) 21:04, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Now you're telling people you can edit but they can't and insist his own autobio is less worthy than a web site that copied erroneous info. There are more sources that back up his autobio than your measly two sources. — Rlevse • Talk • 21:11, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

I'm not saying that. I'm saying, keep a NPOV! His autobio is a good source, just as my 2 sources are. Also, your first source, is from the AEI! Not even close to being reliable on this subject! Your second source is an Italian website! Not even close to being reliable on this subject (there are Many Lebanese websites that state that both Barbera and Hanna were Lebanese. But I have not used them to keep a NPOV!).

That leaves you with 2 sources, just as I have 2. So stop your reverts. Knight Prince - Sage Veritas (talk) 21:14, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Rlevse, who are you to say if the info is "erroneous"? Your problem is with the Daily Telegraph and my other source. Both are reliable but if you have criticism about their info, I suggest you take it up with them. Knight Prince - Sage Veritas (talk) 21:17, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

See my comment on the Talk:Joseph Barbera at 21:20, 31 Aug, basically you keep zooming in on one source and ignoring the others. And then consider that you got yourself blocked twice over this. There's a reason, think about it. — Rlevse • Talk • 21:37, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

–Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:26, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

One source??? YOU ARE THE ONE PUSHING A POV! Not accepting ANY SOURCES that state he was LEBANESE! I'm the one accepting your sources as well as mine! Blocked? Not surprised. Beginning to understand why hardly anyone outside of Wikipedia trusts it! Knight Prince - Sage Veritas (talk) 21:44, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Knight Prince - Sage Veritas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Excuse me but How were my edits "Vandalism"!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!? Were they "Vandalism" because I was trying to keep a NPOV on 2 articles, while the 2 other users (who were Not blocked) WERE PUSHING A POV???????? Choosing which sources to accept and which not to is NOT NPOV. It is a POV. INCLUDING All sources available IS NPOV. Completely ridiculous and contradicting behavior!

Decline reason:

You weren't blocked for vandalism. You were blocked for edit warring, which you clearly were. Smashville^talk 21:59, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Edit warring? Show me where! Because I was not.Knight Prince - Sage Veritas (talk) 22:03, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Rlevse, you really are a racist you know. Also, I'm Not even an Arab! lol Furthermore, Do not put words in my mouth. GOT IT?? Your just so blinded by your hatred its incredible and laughable. :) Knight Prince - Sage Veritas (talk) 00:04, 1 September 2009 (UTC)