User talk:Looie496: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
TeacherA (talk | contribs)
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 47: Line 47:


I saw the tremendous effort that you have put into reviewing that article for GA. I am concerned because I don't think it is a good article. It's a difficult thing. Not good enough for medical uses, too wordy for laymen use. [[User:TeacherA|TeacherA]] ([[User talk:TeacherA|talk]]) 00:42, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
I saw the tremendous effort that you have put into reviewing that article for GA. I am concerned because I don't think it is a good article. It's a difficult thing. Not good enough for medical uses, too wordy for laymen use. [[User:TeacherA|TeacherA]] ([[User talk:TeacherA|talk]]) 00:42, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

== [[User:Terra Novus]] ==

Hi, Looie496. You originally blocked {{user|Terra Novus}} back on 29 October 2010 for one week due to disruptive editing.[https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3ATerra+Novus] He appears to have improved since that time, however, I've noticed a return to his earlier problematic editing in the last week. I'm not sure where to go from here, but it would be nice to have some more eyes on this. Thanks. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 11:36, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:37, 13 January 2011

If you leave a message for me here, I'll respond here. If I leave a message on your talk page, I'll look there for a response (but of course you can respond here if you want to).

Istituto Italiano di Tecnolgia

Hi, I'd like to ask for a redirect. We have wikipage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_Institute_of_Technology. The institutes name should always appear in Italian, a bit like British Airways for instance. The redirect should got to this wikipage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Istituto_Italiano_di_Tecnologia Thanks Webmaster_iit (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:34, 14 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Template:Brain neuron map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 12:04, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:Brain neuron map

A tag has been placed on Template:Brain neuron map requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. Mhiji (talk) 16:05, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program is looking for new Online Ambassadors

Hi Looie! I noticed your activity as a Good Article reviewer, and wanted to let you know about the Wikipedia Ambassador Program, and specifically the role of Online Ambassador. We're looking for friendly Wikipedians who are good at reviewing articles and giving feedback to serve as mentors for students who are assigned to write for Wikipedia in their classes.

If you're interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors in the coming term. If that's something you want to do, please apply!

You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).

I hope to hear from you soon.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 23:00, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Parkinson's disease

While it has been some time I feel I have addressed all your concerns at GAN. I was hoping you could continue your great review soon enough. Bests.--Garrondo (talk) 10:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the tremendous effort that you have put into reviewing that article for GA. I am concerned because I don't think it is a good article. It's a difficult thing. Not good enough for medical uses, too wordy for laymen use. TeacherA (talk) 00:42, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Looie496. You originally blocked Terra Novus (talk · contribs) back on 29 October 2010 for one week due to disruptive editing.[1] He appears to have improved since that time, however, I've noticed a return to his earlier problematic editing in the last week. I'm not sure where to go from here, but it would be nice to have some more eyes on this. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 11:36, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]