User talk:Mbz1/a7: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Blocked: should have cleared autoblock
→‎1RR restriction: new section
Line 561: Line 561:


When I went to do it, it had already been done, this page edited and sock blocked. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 18:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
When I went to do it, it had already been done, this page edited and sock blocked. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 18:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

== 1RR restriction ==

Although I've unblocked you based on your commitment not to edit war any more, in view of your block log and history, I think it may be best if you are placed under a [[WP:1RR|1RR]] restriction. Accordingly, until further notice, do not revert content in any article or other page more than once in a 24 hour period, subject only to exemption for blatant vandalism. If you do revert, even one time, you must immediately take your concern to the relevant talk page, and your edit summary should so note. Violation of this sanction may result in escalating blocks. This sanction may be appealed in the normal ways, for example at my talk, or by making a post at [[WP:AN]] or directly to ArbCom if the previous methods are not satisfactory. This sanction is to remain in place until further notice. ++[[User:Lar|Lar]]: [[User_talk:Lar|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Lar|c]] 19:30, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:30, 28 July 2010


Welcome back!

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Welcome back! Also, thanks for the barnstar. I think you deserve one of these too, for this particularly kind and civil conversation with a new user. I came across that conversation in December, from looking at one of the pictures that he had posted, and was happy to see that someone had been civil to him, especially since he seemed to be in a difficult situation! Cheers, CordeliaNaismith (talk) 02:56, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


How daft of me!

I should have awarded you with this right away.

The Photographer's Barnstar
I, Pericles, award User:Mbz1 this honorary barnstar in recognition of her most excellent and thoughtful work in touching up File:Arm less man.JPG, drastically improving the visual quality of a valuable historic image used in Parthian Empire and several other articles at Wikipedia. I bow to you madam, and thank you! Pericles of AthensTalk 17:23, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much!--Mbz1 (talk) 21:22, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome! You can keep track of the progress I'm making on my draft here if you like: User:PericlesofAthens/Draft for Parthian Empire. I've yet to add your picture, but it will be placed in an appropriate section, most likely "nobility" or "art and architecture". Cheers buddy.--Pericles of AthensTalk 22:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well-deserved

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your many generous donations of gorgeous images (especially those breathtaking photos at User:Mbz1/Mbz1 gallery/Underwater), please accept this as a small token of my appreciation. –xenotalk 19:21, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Successful featured picture nomination

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Dead trees at Mammoth Hot Springs.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Maedin\talk 18:00, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Valued Picture

An image created by you has been promoted to valued picture status
Your image, File:Kissing Prairie dog edit 3.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Elekhh (talk) 03:06, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the nomination! I've missed on it.--Mbz1 (talk) 05:33, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


DYK for List of Jewish Nobel Prize Winners

Updated DYK query On March 10, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article List of Jewish Nobel Prize Winners, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Calmer Waters 06:05, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ronald Levy

Updated DYK query On March 10, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ronald Levy, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thelmadatter (talk) 23:43, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Successful featured picture nomination

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Development of Green Flash.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Maedin\talk 18:38, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Successful featured picture nomination

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Mauna Loa from the air.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Maedin\talk 20:09, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Successful featured picture nomination

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Carpilius convexus is consuming Heterocentrotus trigonarius in Hawaii.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Maedin\talk 12:54, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Mercury transit 2.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Makeemlighter (talk) 19:01, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Aureole effect

Updated DYK query On March 26, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Aureole effect, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Mifter (talk) 08:40, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Kohala coast at the Big Island of Hawaii from the air levels.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 13:02, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Maimonides Synagogue

Updated DYK query On April 6, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Maimonides Synagogue, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:02, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


DYK for Fata Morgana (mirage)

Updated DYK query On April 6, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fata Morgana (mirage), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see this made it onto the all-time most-viewed list. Congratulations! --Avenue (talk) 10:30, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it was a very big success as a DYK! Well done, especially on your great images. I was delighted to have been able to work on the text. Invertzoo (talk) 21:42, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Abraham Reuel

Updated DYK query On April 12, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Abraham Reuel, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:52, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The geological history of Point Lobos

Updated DYK query On April 22, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The geological history of Point Lobos, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 06:02, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Looming, Towering, Stooping, and Sinking

Updated DYK query On April 24, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Looming, Towering, Stooping, and Sinking, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 16:03, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jewish pirates

Materialscientist (talk) 08:03, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Bernese Fassnacht (Carnival)

Materialscientist (talk) 16:02, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


DYK for Majorcan cartographic school

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Legends of the Coco de Mer

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 17 May 2010 (UTC)


DYK for Orchid hunters

The DYK project (nominate) 18:02, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Carrier Pigeon (ship)

Bradjamesbrown (talk) 06:04, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Historically significant lunar eclipses

The DYK project (nominate) 18:03, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

You are welcome Mila! Invertzoo (talk) 18:09, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Peacock flounder

RlevseTalk 12:02, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Underwater camouflage and mimicry

RlevseTalk 18:01, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for RMS Mulheim

RlevseTalk 06:02, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


DYK for Australite

RlevseTalk 06:02, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Max Frauenthal

Materialscientist (talk) 00:02, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

I don't hand Barnstars out very often, in fact, I can't remember the last time I did so. I had promised you one, if Herrengasse 23 became a DYK but, it seems the world and Wikipedia must remain in ignorance. However, you have contributed greatly to my crusade to give recognition to lesser and little known buildings - so here it is and you desearve it:


The Content Creativity Barnstar
To Mbz1 for his tremendous work and research in bringing Herrengasse 23 to a wider puplic appreciation.  Giacomo  18:58, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


PS: I would like to give Sandstein something similar for the really good photos, but don't think it wise to hand him a sharp pointy object when I am the vicinity. I will thnk on it.  Giacomo  18:58, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Herrengasse 23 (Bern)

RlevseTalk 00:02, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jacob Barnet affair

Mifter (talk) 12:04, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sol Hachuel

RlevseTalk 00:02, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


DYK for Frederick Mayer (the spy)

RlevseTalk 12:03, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Schloss Reichenbach

RlevseTalk 00:03, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for La Peregrina pearl

RlevseTalk 06:02, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


DYK for The Holocaust's Arab Heroes

RlevseTalk 00:02, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Tub'a Abu Kariba As'ad

The DYK project (nominate) 06:03, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Paul the Octopus

Materialscientist (talk) 12:02, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sefer ha-Temunah

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image promoted to featured

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Peacock_Flounder_Bothus_mancus_in_Kona.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! I'ḏOne 06:41, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neighborhood Bully

Wandering Jew

Well,the neighborhood bully, he’s just one man,
His enemies say he’s on their land.
They got him outnumbered about a million to one,
He got no place to escape to, no place to run.
He’s the neighborhood bully.

The neighborhood bully just lives to survive,
He’s criticized and condemned for being alive.
He’s not supposed to fight back,he’s supposed to have thick skin,
He’s supposed to lay down and die when his door is kicked in.
He’s the neighborhood bully.

The neighborhood bully been driven out of every land,
He’s wandered the earth an exiled man.
Seen his family scattered, his people hounded and torn,
He’s always on trial for just being born.
He’s the neighborhood bully.

Well, he knocked out a lynch mob,he was criticized,
Old women condemned him, said he should apologize.
Then he destroyed a bomb factory, nobody was glad.
The bombs were meant for him.
He was supposed to feel bad.
He’s the neighborhood bully.

Well, the chances are against it and the odds are slim
That he’ll live by the rules that the world makes for him,
’Cause there’s a noose at his neck and a gun at his back
And a license to kill him is given out to every maniac.
He’s the neighborhood bully.

He got no allies to really speak of.
What he gets he must pay for, he don’t get it out of love.
He buys obsolete weapons and he won’t be denied
But no one sends flesh and blood to fight by his side.
He’s the neighborhood bully.

Well, he’s surrounded by pacifists who all want peace,
They pray for it nightly that the bloodshed must cease.
Now, they wouldn’t hurt a fly.
To hurt one they would weep.
They lay and they wait for this bully to fall asleep.
He’s the neighborhood bully.

Every empire that’s enslaved him is gone,
Egypt and Rome,even the great Babylon.
He’s made a garden of paradise in the desert sand,
In bed with nobody,under no one’s command.
He’s the neighborhood bully.

Now his holiest books have been trampled upon,
No contract he signed was worth what it was written on.
He took the crumbs of the world and he turned it into wealth,
Took sickness and disease and he turned it into health.
He’s the neighborhood bully.

What’s anybody indebted to him for?
Nothin’, they say.
He just likes to cause war.
Pride and prejudice and superstition indeed,
They wait for this bully like a dog waits to feed.
He’s the neighborhood bully.

What has he done to wear so many scars?
Does he change the course of rivers?
Does he pollute the moon and stars?
Neighborhood bully, standing on the hill,
Running out the clock,time standing still,
Neighborhood bully.
Bob Dylan

  • “The rain it raineth on the just
    And also on the unjust fella,
    But chiefly on the just, because
    The unjust steals the just's umbrella”






  • 'Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?'
    'That depends a good deal on where you want to get to,' said the Cat.
    'I don't much care where —' said Alice.
    'Then it doesn't matter which way you go,' said the Cat
Spumoni
Spumoni
  • 'But I don't want to go among mad people,' Alice remarked.
    'Oh, you can't help that,' said the Cat: 'we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad.'
    'How do you know I'm mad?' said Alice.
    'You must be,' said the Cat, 'or you wouldn't have come here.'

Sorry

I wasn't being malicious. I reviewed a few nominations by this editor and found that his/her work needed a ton of copyediting and wikifying, so I thought that s/he wasn't familiar with Wikipedia policies. Then I started seeing his/her tick on nominations without any of the usual explanations, like "date, length, hook source OK", and I thought that s/he wasn't familiar with DYK policies either. Then I saw his/her tick in the middle of your discussion, before the reviewer got back to your complaint, so I crossed it out lest an administrator accept the nomination without taking your complaint into consideration. My apologies if I misread the situation. Yoninah (talk) 09:15, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you did not provide any explanations for crossing out their vote either, except in the edit summary. IMO it is better to avoid altering other editors comments, it is better just to add your own. Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 15:47, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mbz1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I edited according to the clear consensus 6 editors over 2 for keeping old version.
I was acting in accordance with BOLD, revert, discuss.
I asked to wait with all changes until the voting is closed.
Please notice it is only my second block for edit warring, the first one was lifted 40 minutes after it was posted.
I notified the other editor about 3RR on their talk page, and only after that they reported me.
Still I probably should not have done what I did, and I am sorry. I promise not edit warring again.
Please unblock me, if it is possible. Of course, if I am unblocked the other editor should be unblocked as well because it will be unfair to keep them blocked. So, if it is impossible to unblock both of us, please do not unblock me alone.
Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 21:44, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The 3RR report is at WP:AN3#User:Mbz1 reported by User:Binksternet (Result: Mb: 48h; Bi: 24h). Though you made four reverts, your defense to the complaint seems to be that you were reverting to enforce a talk page consensus. Note that the WP:3RR policy includes a number of exceptions but enforcement of what you believe to be a talk page consensus is not one of the accepted reasons. You did not *have* to revert four times. It seems that you went into this situation in a conscious way so why should reviewing admins try to rescue you from the consequences of your own decision? This appears to be your tenth block. EdJohnston (talk) 23:30, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


Well, It appears that you were not even able to count the numbers of my blocks. I was blocked 7 times before, and it is my 8th and not 10th block (I hope the blocks done by own request and the blocks issued by mistakes do not count as the blocks, do they?) From those 7 blocks only one was for edit warring, and it was lifted less than an hour after it was posted with admin apologizing because the article was protected, and the block was not warranted. So, should we subtract one more block? Then it is only my 7th block with none for edit warring.
Besides, I apologized for edit warring, promised to stop it, and never do it again, and keep me blocking after that is a punishment, which the blocks are not.
So, I consider your decline reason to be unfair.--Mbz1 (talk) 23:55, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|I was wrong, when I engaged in edit warring. I am sorry. I promise it will never happen again.--Mbz1 (talk) 23:57, 27 July 2010 (UTC)}}[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

For time served and because I trust you have learned a lesson and will not edit war again. Please don't edit war, take matters to talk. Best. ++Lar: t/c 18:36, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request handled by: ++Lar: t/c

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Your autoblock should also be clear now. ++Lar: t/c 19:25, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

recent changes

  • recent changes to my Six Day War sandbox, see this. • Ling.Nut 05:35, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocks are not intended for use in retaliation, as punishment, or where there is no current conduct issue which is of concern.

Blocking policy purpose and goal

Blocks are intended to reduce the likelihood of future problems, by either removing, or encouraging change in, a source of disruption. They are not intended for use in retaliation, as punishment, or where there is no current conduct issue which is of concern.

Really? Is that so? I sincerely apologized, for edit warring, and promised it will never happen again. I have never given such promises before, so I possibly could not have broken any in the past. I cannot believe that between few dozens wikipedia administrators, who saw my unblock request, was not any one brave enough and fair enough to simply comply with the blocking policy and to unblock me. Oh well. I guess blocks are intended as punishment! Time to re-write the policy.--Mbz1 (talk) 08:00, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You've been reported for colluding with user:broccoli

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#user:mbz1_colluding_with_user:broccoli Preciseaccuracy (talk) 10:19, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A bit of encouragement

You are a tremendous asset to Wikipedia. You know it. Many of us here know it too. All of this will pass, like rain off a hat, and you will continue to be a tremendous asset to Wikipedia. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:57, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anna has expressed my opinion as well. I sign on every word she said. Keep up the good work. Broccoli (talk) 11:58, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Here is a puzzle to keep you busy while you're in Wiki-jail. (Psssst, there's a file in it.) Get out soon!

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:34, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Inquiry

Dear Mbz1,

I discovered your brillant photo of a green turtle in Wikipedia and would like to use it for a paper for primary school children that is going to be published in September. The paper will be distributed for free in a run of 20,000 to all primary school children of the city of Bonn, Germany.

I am a teacher at a primary school in Bonn and one of the three "publishers". We do this work voluntarily.

One subject of the issue will be the sea turtle rescue project in the Gulf of Mexico. Besides information, the short text is aimed to be motivation, both for reading (of course) and ecological awareness. The picture is meant for illustrating the beauty of this creature.

You have genoursly licensed this picture to everyone for further use. Unfortunately, the picture is not at a high resolution to use it in print media. I was told that we need 300 dpi.

So could you help us, please? Could you name a url where we can download it at a higher resolution? Or could sent it to me by email? Is it possible to get the copyrigt for one issue of the paper for free or at least low in price? Of course your name would be mentioned in the paper.

Kind regards Martina —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.222.152.125 (talk) 17:29, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your email request

When I went to do it, it had already been done, this page edited and sock blocked. Dougweller (talk) 18:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1RR restriction

Although I've unblocked you based on your commitment not to edit war any more, in view of your block log and history, I think it may be best if you are placed under a 1RR restriction. Accordingly, until further notice, do not revert content in any article or other page more than once in a 24 hour period, subject only to exemption for blatant vandalism. If you do revert, even one time, you must immediately take your concern to the relevant talk page, and your edit summary should so note. Violation of this sanction may result in escalating blocks. This sanction may be appealed in the normal ways, for example at my talk, or by making a post at WP:AN or directly to ArbCom if the previous methods are not satisfactory. This sanction is to remain in place until further notice. ++Lar: t/c 19:30, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]