User talk:PumpkinSky: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:16, 9 July 2011

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Donald W. Loveland, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Donald W. Loveland was changed by PumpkinSky (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870877 on 2011-07-07T23:19:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:19, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Donald W. Loveland. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Nasnema Chat 23:22, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Pfalzweyer. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nasnema Chat 23:23, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was NOT unconstructive. Change your name to DumbBot. What a welcome to wikipedia.PumpkinSky (talk) 23:25, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you kidding? It's not orig research. It's on the Duke website and was a couple of words. It's hardly personal analysis either, just his speciality. Do you greet all new users this way?PumpkinSky (talk) 00:08, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, PumpkinSky! Thank you for your contributions. I am Naraht and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Naraht (talk) 01:35, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

finally a friendly post on my talk page!PumpkinSky (talk) 01:38, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, PumpkinSky. You have new messages at Naraht's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

Hello, PumpkinSky. You have new messages at Naraht's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi

Ahhhh ... I see what you mean about "lecturing" on sources. I dropped by to "welcome" you, but I see you already got a couple of those obligatory links. Sorry a couple of my colleagues were so abrupt with a new editor, sometimes folks get real snippy about our WP:BLP stuff. They probably forget about our NO BITE concept. Anyway, welcome to Wikipedia, and feel free to drop me a question anytime. Once you get used to the joint, it can actually be a pretty enjoyable place to contribute to. Cheers and best. I did answer your question about the sources on the Collier shooting talk page. (are you familiar with putting things on your watchlist yet?) ... cheers. — Ched : ? 15:36, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to see another friendly user! Yes I know about watch lists the other post answers my questions. The thing with the notices above is that they're inconsistent and hypocritical. For example, you see, I put something into the Loveland article and it's from the same "source" listed as the other info and there were no inline refs at all but they only remove my edit not the whole article! Then I tell both users of an article with whole sections with no refs and an article, nice one too, without a single ref. They do nothing about it and ignore me. I can only explain that as sheer hypocrisy!PumpkinSky (talk) 18:25, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thx 4 yr help

Thks 4 yr help on the http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=College_tuition_in_the_United_States&action=history article -- I think now enough eyes are on the article to keep it somewhat protected -- that new editor that messed with me was wrong (Thx 4 yr defense here), but luckily, after I looked at some of his/her edits, it seems that most of them seem normal, so mayby, I think, he will calm down and be no trouble in the future now that the community has gotten on his a little.

(-:/ 71.101.40.113 (talk) 19:20, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If need be, I will state my experiences with Nasnema, but I won't get in the middle of the college tuition article debate. PumpkinSky (talk) 19:23, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please do not add [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|unsourced]] or [[Wikipedia:No original research|original content]]{{#if:Pfalzweyer|, as you did with <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pfalzweyer?diff=438320754 this edit]</span> to [[:Pfalzweyer]]}}. Doing so violates Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability policy]]. If you continue to do so, you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia.<!-- Template:Huggle/warn-unsor-3 --> <small><span style="border:2px solid green;padding:0px;">[[User:Nasnema|<font style="color:green;background:white;"><b>Nasnema</b></font>]] [[User_talk:Nasnema|<font style="color:white;background:green;">&nbsp;Chat&nbsp;</font>]]</span></small> 23:23, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 :It was NOT unconstructive. Change your name to DumbBot. What a welcome to wikipedia.[[User:PumpkinSky|PumpkinSky]] ([[User talk:PumpkinSky#top|talk]]) 23:25, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
-[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=|link=]] This is your '''last warning'''; the next time you violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:No original research|no original research policy]] by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at [[:Donald W. Loveland]], you may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-nor4 --> ''When changing information please cite a [[WP:RS|reliable source]], thanks.'' [[User:5 albert square|5 albert square]] ([[User talk:5 albert square|talk]]) 00:00, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 ::Are you kidding? It's not orig research. It's on the Duke website and was a couple of words. It's hardly personal analysis either, just his speciality. Do you greet all new users this way?[[User:PumpkinSky|PumpkinSky]] ([[User talk:PumpkinSky#top|talk]]) 00:08, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 ==Welcome!==