User talk:Samisahiri: Difference between revisions
Eaglestorm (talk | contribs) →October 2011: new section |
|||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
You repeatedly are adding content to articles without any explanation that is not appropriate. This is disruptive editing and nor constructive. Your edits will all be reversed unless you are willing to try to make a case to convince other editors that you are correct. that happens on the talk pages. But your conduct so far has been obstructing and ultimately is vandalism. [[Special:Contributions/99.192.52.78|99.192.52.78]] ([[User talk:99.192.52.78|talk]]) 01:55, 23 October 2011 (UTC) |
You repeatedly are adding content to articles without any explanation that is not appropriate. This is disruptive editing and nor constructive. Your edits will all be reversed unless you are willing to try to make a case to convince other editors that you are correct. that happens on the talk pages. But your conduct so far has been obstructing and ultimately is vandalism. [[Special:Contributions/99.192.52.78|99.192.52.78]] ([[User talk:99.192.52.78|talk]]) 01:55, 23 October 2011 (UTC) |
||
== October 2011 == |
|||
[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Desperation Day]]. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:TALKDONTREVERT|collaborate]] with others, to avoid editing [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptively]], and to [[WP:CONSENSUS|try to reach a consensus]] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> |
|||
Please be particularly aware, [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|Wikipedia's policy on edit warring]] states: |
|||
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts. |
|||
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' |
|||
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew -->--[[User:Eaglestorm|Eaglestorm]] ([[User talk:Eaglestorm|talk]]) 00:06, 24 October 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:06, 24 October 2011
Your submission at Articles for creation
- The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
- Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
Alpha Quadrant talk 05:44, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Clearly you have no idea what appropriate content is. Please stop making inappropriate edits.
You repeatedly are adding content to articles without any explanation that is not appropriate. This is disruptive editing and nor constructive. Your edits will all be reversed unless you are willing to try to make a case to convince other editors that you are correct. that happens on the talk pages. But your conduct so far has been obstructing and ultimately is vandalism. 99.192.52.78 (talk) 01:55, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
October 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Desperation Day. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.--Eaglestorm (talk) 00:06, 24 October 2011 (UTC)