User talk:ScottyBerg

NYC Subway Graphic

I agree that is duplicative, but it does provide unique information useful to Wikipedia users. It adds information (sorting by express and local lines) that is not featured elsewhere on the site. Taylorluker (talk) 17:55, 6 December 2010 (UTC)taylorluker

Best to discuss this on the article talk page, to get a wider sampling of opinions. ScottyBerg (talk) 20:50, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

East Harlem

The Italian Harlem article correctly illustrates my point and there is no reference that supports the assertion that the remaining Italian Americans are living mostly on pleasant ave, the ones who stayed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jammin566z (talk • contribs) 14:25, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Then the thing to do is to remove the Pleasant Avenue reference, not the entire reference. ScottyBerg (talk) 14:30, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Re:Tony, they destroyed the article AGAIN

I see. However please refrain from removing the "See also" section, which is my concern, since all Puerto Rican related bios. have adopted it in their format. Tell the Ip or the creator of the article, in his talk page, the same that you told me and invite him/her to discuss the situation. Take care. Tony the Marine (talk) 01:10, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

The creator of the article is an indef blocked meat/sockpuppet of the subject of the article, as is, probably, the IP that recently materialized to canvass. I am sure that he/she is perfectly aware of my post to your page. ScottyBerg (talk) 01:30, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

I left a message on my "talk page' to the Ip to take up the issue here: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. As for myself, my time is now very limited due to personal family and health issues. Thank you once more for your proper interaction with me. Tony the Marine (talk) 01:36, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

I agree that administrator intervention is urgently needed. ScottyBerg (talk) 02:54, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

its a sock farm

Hi Scotty. I do totally agree with you, seems like it is one single person and it was the same user that created the BLP attack on the political opponent of Dennis. I was just looking at some way to move forward if they were prepared to stay in one account and edit within policy .. but the attack page was one of the worst I have ever seen.. .. well done to you for sticking with and working on the report, it is still open and does seem to be now waiting for admin to action the report .. best regards and thanks for your work there. Off2riorob (talk) 01:46, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

Hello, ScottyBerg! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 03:53, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Your edit summary

re: UFO digest is not a reliable source for a BLP - you do realise that Andrew Carlssin was a fictional person and not a Living Person so BLP concerns don't apply? Of course in the past 24 hours the article has been edited to present his existence as fact, which doesn't help matters but still.... Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 00:35, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Heh. No I didn't. And you're right, I got the impression from reading the latest version that he was supposed to be a real person. Thanks. ScottyBerg (talk) 03:03, 12 January 2011 (UTC)