User talk:Sensei 2105: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Sockpuppetry
Line 44: Line 44:
|}
|}
You have been accused of [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sockpuppetry]]. Please refer to [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yakudza19]] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|notes for the suspect]] before editing the evidence page. [[User:DAJF|DAJF]] ([[User talk:DAJF|talk]]) 12:45, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
You have been accused of [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sockpuppetry]]. Please refer to [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yakudza19]] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|notes for the suspect]] before editing the evidence page. [[User:DAJF|DAJF]] ([[User talk:DAJF|talk]]) 12:45, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

== Edit Warring Warning ==

{{uw-3rr}}
See:
[https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Takayuki_Kubota&action=historysubmit&diff=331607649&oldid=331605301]
[https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Takayuki_Kubota&action=historysubmit&diff=331152425&oldid=331098575]
[https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Takayuki_Kubota&action=historysubmit&diff=330469044&oldid=330467721]
[https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Takayuki_Kubota&action=historysubmit&diff=330264908&oldid=330237871]
[[User:Jmcw37|jmcw]] ([[User talk:Jmcw37|talk]]) 12:47, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:47, 14 December 2009

Welcome!

Hi Sensei 2105! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

There are standards developed by the Wiki community concerning articles of Japanese culture.

Wiki distinguishes the names of people born before and after 1868: before 1868, Japanese order (Family name, First name) is used; after 1868, Western order ( First name, Family name) is used. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Japan-related articles)#Names. 窪田孝行 was born after 1868: in Wiki, he is referred to as Takayuki Kubota.

Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(biographies)#Honorific_prefixes discusses the use of titles; Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Martial_arts#Contradiction has a discussion of the Wiki Martial Arts project usage recommendations. Briefly, to say 'Takayuki Kubota is Soke' or 'Takayuki Kubota is Grand Master' is acceptable (and should have a reference.) Nobody here means disrespect to 宗家窪田孝行 when he is referred to as 'Takayuki Kubota' or 'Kubota' in the article.

Stop by at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Martial_arts to see other activities in martial arts in Wikipedia. jmcw (talk) 21:24, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Soke Takayuki Kubota. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - [[:{{{article}}}]]. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at [[:{{{article}}}]] - you might like to discuss new information at [[Talk:{{{article}}}|the article's talk page]].

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest this deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article you created (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on Talk:Soke Takayuki Kubota explaining your position, although an administrator may still believe deletion to be necessary. Regardless, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, as this is forbidden under the arcane rules of Wikipedia. If you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Scjessey (talk) 14:13, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Soke Takayuki Kubota, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Scjessey (talk) 14:19, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Soke Takayuki Kubota. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Scjessey (talk) 14:22, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Soke Takayuki Kubota. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Scjessey (talk) 14:34, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Takayuki Kubota, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 14:38, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Your editing is currently being discussed at the Administrators' notice board here.

Please be careful not to engage in edit wars with other editors. Edit warring and reverting are specifically against Wikipedia policy, and will result in your account being blocked if you continue. You should also take a look at our three-revert rule, and note that breaking this always results in a block and that three reverts isn't an entitlement. You are encouraged to discuss your edits with other editors on the article talk page so that agreement can be reached between you. This is especially important where your edits are going against a previous consensus.

Please take note of the above. If you engage in edit warring again, I or another of Wikipedia's administrators will be forced to apply sanctions to this account. EyeSerenetalk 20:11, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sock Puppet / Meat Puppet Warning

You are suspected of being a sock-puppet, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. See [1]. Please read the Wiki guidelines and consider your relationship to User:Sensei_0208. You are warned: continued editing as a sockpuppet could lead to the accounts being banned. jmcw (talk) 10:38, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009 (ctd.)

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard to read formatting, as you did in Takayuki Kubota, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. --DAJF (talk) 16:07, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yakudza19 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. DAJF (talk) 12:45, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring Warning

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. See: [2] [3] [4] [5] jmcw (talk) 12:47, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]