User talk:Spleodrach: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Lapsed Pacifist (talk | contribs)
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 68: Line 68:


::::You made a serious accusation about me. Will you be raising that issue at the RfE? [[User:Lapsed Pacifist|Lapsed Pacifist]] ([[User talk:Lapsed Pacifist|talk]]) 14:03, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
::::You made a serious accusation about me. Will you be raising that issue at the RfE? [[User:Lapsed Pacifist|Lapsed Pacifist]] ([[User talk:Lapsed Pacifist|talk]]) 14:03, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

(e/c) I have restored the anon comment on [[Talk:Joe Higgins]], as it includes opinion about the article at the time. [https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Talk:Joe_Higgins&action=history&offset=20091211140121&limit=40 this] six month edit-war is mind boggling. Was it elevated to one of the noticeboards? It does [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Talk:Joe_Higgins|not appear]] to have been. Anyway, you both need to put down the stick. If someone else wants to remove it again, it will be discussed at a noticeboard. --<span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:John Vandenberg|John Vandenberg]] <sup>'''([[User talk:John Vandenberg|chat]])'''</sup></span> 14:14, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:15, 11 December 2009

Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop

As you participated in the recent Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two requests for comment that relate to the use of SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.

For the Arbitration Committee,
Risker (talk) 08:34, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bernard O'Rourke

If you look at the database you will find both names used, In all records of voting in the house he appears as Bernard O'Rourke. In the book about him Inniskeen 1912-1918 (The Political perspective of Bernard O'Rourke} by Terence Dooley Four Courts press he isnt called Brian. MCC records show him as Bernard. I presume Brian was an Irish version of Bernard. I do know he called his son Brian but his grandson is called Bernard. His headstone reads Bernard. Im presently doing a page on him and I thought it made more sense to change here than put in a redirect.

Fine and please sign your posts in future. Snappy (talk) 16:49, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks and apologies for oversight on signing. He was a pro treaty Sinn Fein member and afterwards a member of Cumann na nGaedhael and Fine Gael so is the description independent right? Cathar11 (talk) 18:07, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The oireachtas db describes him as independent from 1922-28 and then nothing for the remainder. The oireachtas db is sometimes wrong or incomplete, so if you have info that he was pro-Treaty SF/CnaG/FG then he can be entered as such for the appropriate times. Snappy (talk) 18:14, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ta, very

for repairing Shatter's pipe ClemMcGann (talk) 01:29, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Current TDs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:47, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John Bailey (Irish politician)

Just a friendly heads up on John Bailey (Irish politician). You prodded this article a couple of months ago, and it's now been restored as a contested prod. Given that it's been prodded twice, I've suggested to the editor who asked for restoration that they talk to you about your concerns. (See Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Current_requests#John_Bailey_.28Irish_politician.29). If you still think he's not notable, feel free to take to AfD. Cheers! --Fabrictramp | talk to me 11:43, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very surprised you restored this article. It's about a non notable local politician, one of over 1500 local councillors in Ireland, 99.9% of whom have no claims to fame outside there immediate locality. I will certainly be AFD'ing it. Snappy (talk) 11:52, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Restoring contested prods, even after they have been deleted, is considered an uncontroversial restoration and usually done simply on request. The idea is that if someone is objecting, even months later, it's not a suitable candidate for prod. Cheers! --Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:23, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. I have AFD'ed it anyway. Snappy (talk) 18:27, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Do you want to discuss this before nominating for AFD? MoyrossLADY (talk) 11:59, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, already done, please discuss it at AFD. Snappy (talk) 12:04, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Dearey

Is this local politician notable. Should you propose Mark Dearey for afd too. Its been Prod recently for the second time.Cathar11 (talk) 18:49, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IMHO, he is not notable, unless you count being only one of 3 green party councillors and retaining his seat in 2009 local elections (which I don't). The prod was contested so you can't prod it again but you will have to AFD it. Also, most of the article is a cut and paste job from his green party website bio. Anyway, there are far too many of these non notable local councillor articles being created by their family, friends, supporters and party activists. I have nominated 3 of them recently. Snappy (talk) 18:55, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Successions

Hey, if I knew making this many mistakes would make me popular, I would've been sloppy a long time ago! Thanks, all help very much apprecieated! Fergananim (talk) 21:11, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John Timoney (disambiguation)

Hello. Just to let you know that this dab has been nominated for deletion using Template:db-disambig. If you have any questions about this, please let me know. Best wishes and keep up all your good work, Boleyn3 (talk) 18:24, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spleodrach. You have new messages at AtSwimTwoBirds's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please

Consider your actions. I'm not asking much. Lapsed Pacifist (talk) 13:09, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop harassing me. Snappy (talk) 13:10, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't believe I am. You have systematically blanked comments of mine here and at Talk:Joe Higgins. I ask only two things of you: firstly, that you explain your sock/meatpuppet/city boy description of me and secondly, that you explain your blanking of my and others' comments on the Higgins talk page. Look at your behaviour; who's harassing who? Lapsed Pacifist (talk) 13:17, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You are still harassing me after I asked to stop in my previous comment. I don't answer to you. You are the one that has an RfE open against you, not me. Any further discussion will take place there NOT HERE. Snappy (talk) 13:20, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You made a serious accusation about me. Will you be raising that issue at the RfE? Lapsed Pacifist (talk) 14:03, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(e/c) I have restored the anon comment on Talk:Joe Higgins, as it includes opinion about the article at the time. this six month edit-war is mind boggling. Was it elevated to one of the noticeboards? It does not appear to have been. Anyway, you both need to put down the stick. If someone else wants to remove it again, it will be discussed at a noticeboard. --John Vandenberg (chat) 14:14, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]