User talk:Viriditas: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 41: Line 41:


Thank you for your contributions to [[Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy]] ... [[The Atlantic]] (dated 15.Dec.2010) and [[Politico (newspaper)]] (dated 10.Dec.2009) were helpful. (",) [[Special:Contributions/99.112.214.186|99.112.214.186]] ([[User talk:99.112.214.186|talk]]) 23:49, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to [[Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy]] ... [[The Atlantic]] (dated 15.Dec.2010) and [[Politico (newspaper)]] (dated 10.Dec.2009) were helpful. (",) [[Special:Contributions/99.112.214.186|99.112.214.186]] ([[User talk:99.112.214.186|talk]]) 23:49, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

== Would you please stop lying about my edits. ==

At the very least, your edit summary is false. "ce" and "Copyedit" should not be used for significant changes in the text. Furthermore, those edits are not supported by the references you used, although they might possibly be supported by other references. — [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]] [[User talk:Arthur Rubin|(talk)]] 08:06, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:06, 24 July 2011


Aloha

This started when you wrote on my talk page but it has been so long, I thought I should respond here. Almost a year ago you said you had found some of my articles and wanted to know if I was interested in upgrading any of them. I was grateful then and I apologize now for never answering. I have not been doing any Wikipedia work in this interval. I am busy rewriting an entry that I expect to submit shortly, which was a personal obligation I took on before going into hibernation, and am just now able to fulfill it. I am not able to say whether I will return to writing here after that. I am also questioning whether Hawaii is really what I should be focusing on, should I initiate any more efforts. Your note was most appreciated, however, as I have enormous respect for the contributions you have made. If I feel I can continue along the lines of my prior work, I will seek your thoughts. Thank you for your support. Alawa (talk) 19:26, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Reward(s) are here...

The Special Barnstar
You have always kept me in check and have worked well with other editors. Therefore, not only that you have earned a good cookie, but you also earn more than a cookie. This barnstar shall be awarded to you. Though we may disagree with certain subjects, this is a great achievement for a great person doing their job! CHAK 001 (Improvements? Please let me know!) 07:38, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy.

Thank you for your contributions to Talk:Climatic Research Unit email controversy ... The Atlantic (dated 15.Dec.2010) and Politico (newspaper) (dated 10.Dec.2009) were helpful. (",) 99.112.214.186 (talk) 23:49, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please stop lying about my edits.

At the very least, your edit summary is false. "ce" and "Copyedit" should not be used for significant changes in the text. Furthermore, those edits are not supported by the references you used, although they might possibly be supported by other references. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 08:06, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]