User talk:82.213.38.2: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Courtesy notice: new section
Line 18: Line 18:
you are violating the international law, international community and the UN resolutions, in addition by taking sides and promoting a bias, by claiming that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel while NO one recognize it as is!
you are violating the international law, international community and the UN resolutions, in addition by taking sides and promoting a bias, by claiming that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel while NO one recognize it as is!
so the one who is adding a commentary on his own personal analysis in YOU--[[Special:Contributions/82.213.38.2|82.213.38.2]] ([[User talk:82.213.38.2#top|talk]]) 12:50, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
so the one who is adding a commentary on his own personal analysis in YOU--[[Special:Contributions/82.213.38.2|82.213.38.2]] ([[User talk:82.213.38.2#top|talk]]) 12:50, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

== Courtesy notice ==

Per [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Palestine-Israel_articles#Further_remedies]], you are only allowed one revert in a 24 hour period on articles related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. I can see that you waited ''just'' over 24 hours before making your next edit to [[Jerusalem]] after your first one was reverted. That is a classic case of gaming the system, and whatever you may think, it is not amusing. As a result, per [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Palestine-Israel_articles#Discretionary_sanctions]], as an [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Palestine-Israel_articles#Uninvolved_administrators|uninvolved administrator]], I am notifying you that if you again attempt to game the system, I or another administrator may, at their discretion, further sanction you (e.g. by further restricting the number of reverts you may make) or block you from editing. A record of this notification will be made at [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Palestine-Israel_articles#Log_of_notifications]]. [[User:J.delanoy|<font color="green">J'''.'''delanoy</font>]][[User Talk:J.delanoy|<sup><font color="red">gabs</font></sup>]][[Special:Contributions/J.delanoy|<font color="blue"><sub>adds</sub></font>]] 16:18, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:18, 6 December 2010

Hi, The subject is very sensitive, so such changes must me discussed in the talk page first. We always need consensus. Please try to add references to not directly in the article by talk in the discussion page first. Also try to begin by reading this [1] and this [2]. Then add a new topic here Talk:Jerusalem

Thanks. But my point was that these issues are very clear, and while this subject is very sensitive, we must stick with the international law and UN resolutions, and not with any side of the conflict.--82.213.38.2 (talk) 12:43, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 'Abud, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ElComandanteChe (talk) 18:12, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
why don't you explain to me what was not constructive to you exactly instead of just reverting and not providing any explanation? --82.213.38.2 (talk) 07:16, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You have violated the neutral point of view policy, a policy considered nonnegotiable by most Wikipedia editors. Additionally, in more recent edits you've violated another basic policies, such as using reliable sources and information verifiability (see Talk:'Abud#Saint_Barbara.27s_Church_demolition_in_2003 here). In general, your contribution seems to be affected by personal views, a shortcoming one have to try to overcome to effectively edit Wikipedia. Meanwhile I'm not going to revert your edits or give you more warnings, but rather try to help you to find what's appropriated and what's not in Wikipedia, and how the things are getting done here. Most important: don't hesitate to ask questions. --ElComandanteChe (talk) 09:29, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ElComandanteChe for your feedback, and it was not my intention to violate any of the wikipedia terms, I fixed the article and added a source as well. hope all is well right now :) --82.213.38.2 (talk) 14:13, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Jerusalem. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Wording of the introduction is the result of discussions going back many years and found in the archives of Talk:Jerusalem. Continuing to push your point of view without obtaining a new consensus will get you blocked. Giving a false edit summary can also get you blocked. Hertz1888 (talk) 09:18, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

you are violating the international law, international community and the UN resolutions, in addition by taking sides and promoting a bias, by claiming that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel while NO one recognize it as is! so the one who is adding a commentary on his own personal analysis in YOU--82.213.38.2 (talk) 12:50, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy notice

Per Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Palestine-Israel_articles#Further_remedies, you are only allowed one revert in a 24 hour period on articles related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. I can see that you waited just over 24 hours before making your next edit to Jerusalem after your first one was reverted. That is a classic case of gaming the system, and whatever you may think, it is not amusing. As a result, per Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Palestine-Israel_articles#Discretionary_sanctions, as an uninvolved administrator, I am notifying you that if you again attempt to game the system, I or another administrator may, at their discretion, further sanction you (e.g. by further restricting the number of reverts you may make) or block you from editing. A record of this notification will be made at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Palestine-Israel_articles#Log_of_notifications. J.delanoygabsadds 16:18, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]