Please do not remove the [[WP:Notability]] tag from [[Harry Benjamin's Syndrome]] until all issues have been resolved on the talk page at [[Talk:Harry Benjamin's Syndrome]]. Thanks. [[User:Jokestress|Jokestress]] ([[User talk:Jokestress|talk]]) 17:49, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Please do not remove the [[WP:Notability]] tag from [[Harry Benjamin's Syndrome]] until all issues have been resolved on the talk page at [[Talk:Harry Benjamin's Syndrome]]. Thanks. [[User:Jokestress|Jokestress]] ([[User talk:Jokestress|talk]]) 17:49, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
There is not reason for to put that tag about notability on the top of the article, this article have enough reliable sources. This is only a personal problem that you have Andrea about us, based on misconceptions about the true spirit of our patient advocacy movement and based in your personal beliefs. Please, let us in peace and stop putting these tags.
:There is not reason for to put that tag about notability on the top of the article, this article have enough reliable sources. This is only a personal problem that you have Andrea about us, based on misconceptions about the true spirit of our patient advocacy movement and based in your personal beliefs. Please, let us in peace and stop putting these tags.
Hello, 88.2.224.215, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jokestress (talk) 17:49, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There is not reason for to put that tag about notability on the top of the article, this article have enough reliable sources. This is only a personal problem that you have Andrea about us, based on misconceptions about the true spirit of our patient advocacy movement and based in your personal beliefs. Please, let us in peace and stop putting these tags.
Your recent editing history at Harry Benjamin's Syndrome shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jokestress (talk) 18:29, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
