User talk:Abd: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Abd (talk | contribs)
remove stuff just no longer relevant. That was quick!
Line 39: Line 39:


I'll be periodically making suggestions for the cold fusion article here, but serious work on that article is impossible under the hostile and anti-collaborative environment that prevails there at this time. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd#top|talk]]) 18:10, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
I'll be periodically making suggestions for the cold fusion article here, but serious work on that article is impossible under the hostile and anti-collaborative environment that prevails there at this time. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd#top|talk]]) 18:10, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

== General sanction imposed - topic ban reimposed for 1 year on Cold Fusion articles and related pages ==

Pursuant to the ANI and Meta discussions, I find that you have re-engaged in the prior disruptive behavior that caused Arbcom to issue the sanction a little over a year ago.

I am enacting a general sanction as authorized by Arbcom:

Abd is topic banned for 1 additional year from today's date from Cold Fusion articles, talk pages, and related pages, interpreted broadly, under the General sanction remedy in the Abd-WmC case.

[[User:Georgewilliamherbert|Georgewilliamherbert]] ([[User talk:Georgewilliamherbert|talk]]) 21:32, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:32, 5 October 2010

Alternatively, I may not be back at all, more than occasionally, I have no crystal ball, and real life beckons invitingly.


>Notice to IP and newly-registered editors

IP and newly registered editors: due to vandalism, this page is sometimes semiprotected, which may prevent you from leaving a message here. If you cannot edit this page, please leave me messages at User talk:Abd/IP.

WELCOME TO Abd TALK

Before reading User talk:Abd

WARNING: Reading the screeds, tomes, or rants of Abd has been known to cause serious damage to mental health. One editor, a long-time Wikipedian, in spite of warnings from a real-life organization dedicated to protecting the planet from the likes of Abd, actually read Abd's comments and thought he understood them.


After reading User talk:Abd


After reading, his behavior became erratic. He proposed WP:PRX and insisted on promoting it. Continuing after he was unblocked, and in spite of his extensive experience, with many thousands of edits,he created a hoax article and actually made a joke in mainspace. When he was unblocked from that, he created a non-notable article on Easter Bunny Hotline, and was finally considered banned. What had really happened? His brain had turned to Dog vomit slime mold (see illustration).

Caution is advised.







Wikibreak

I've decided that I prefer editing papers for peer-reviewed journals to editing Wikipedia, which feels like slogging through thick mud, while dodging mud and worse slung by others, and I believe I prefer writing them to either of these, and I prefer actually doing the research to writing about it, all in a hierarchy of importance and fun. For those interested in what I've been up to, see Status of cold fusion (2010), convenience copy of this paper in Naturwissenschaften at lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEstatusofcoa.pdf. I'm credited just before the bibliography.

My personal work and research, though, other than writing and studying the field of cold fusion, is reflected in my on-line store, where I'm selling materials for the attempted replication of certain recent and important experiments, published in Naturwissenschaften by the SPAWAR group, on the finding of very low levels of neutron radiation from cold fusion cells. I'm designing kits, but before kits are sold, I'll need to test them!

I'll be periodically making suggestions for the cold fusion article here, but serious work on that article is impossible under the hostile and anti-collaborative environment that prevails there at this time. --Abd (talk) 18:10, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

General sanction imposed - topic ban reimposed for 1 year on Cold Fusion articles and related pages

Pursuant to the ANI and Meta discussions, I find that you have re-engaged in the prior disruptive behavior that caused Arbcom to issue the sanction a little over a year ago.

I am enacting a general sanction as authorized by Arbcom:

Abd is topic banned for 1 additional year from today's date from Cold Fusion articles, talk pages, and related pages, interpreted broadly, under the General sanction remedy in the Abd-WmC case.

Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 21:32, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]