User talk:Anna Frodesiak: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
512bits (talk | contribs)
botany status
Line 79: Line 79:


:::If you don't stop socking, your 1 month block will get extended to indefinite. Just take a break, and come back ''sans'' drama and BS. [[User:Anna Frodesiak|Anna Frodesiak]] ([[User talk:Anna Frodesiak#top|talk]]) 15:03, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
:::If you don't stop socking, your 1 month block will get extended to indefinite. Just take a break, and come back ''sans'' drama and BS. [[User:Anna Frodesiak|Anna Frodesiak]] ([[User talk:Anna Frodesiak#top|talk]]) 15:03, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

I just asked for indefblock because Penispedia is a fetid swamp full of bullies. Children. Now I can tell you what I ''really'' think. You are an interfering, mouthy, nosey troublemaker. None of this is either here or there. You're the one who has to look in the mirror each day. Editors like you are beyond anyone's pity. Sticking your nose in at Q's page. Accusing me of being a sock. You really are stupid if you thought my earlier quote was accusing you of stupidity. Your ''actions'' are stupid. I guess you yourself are, too.


==Botany status==
==Botany status==

Revision as of 16:13, 7 April 2012



If I started a thread on your talk page, I am watching. Please reply there.
To leave me a message click here.



Archives

1-22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30

Email

This is just a note to say that I have sent you an email. Thanks. wctaiwan (talk) 15:10, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. When you recently edited British Rail sandwich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Main (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hello! Thanks! --Sinwense (talk) 09:59, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like it is going to be AfD after all. Mtking (edits) 20:12, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What makes you say that? If it does, don't worry. The chips will fall where they may. I doubt it will end up deleted as it contains content that doesn't appear anywhere else.
The AfDs may end up being over which {{main}}s should exist, which is where this started. The peaceful way of doing this may have been to quietly create the omnibus, then quietly merge tag the individual events. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:58, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Musik Lounge i'm writing about

Hi Anna, i am a very new Wikipedia contributor. I've been working on the Musik Lounge article to be published. First of all, i work for this Musik Lounge company and i'm not trying to promote this business on Wikipedia. I just wanted to write very short information about Musik Lounge from a neutral point of view. Can you please help me to move forward, i also uploaded the Musik Lounge logo, which i created myself for the brand so it's an authorized image.

I'm looking forward to hearing from you. Thanks so much in advance for your help- Volkan

'Musik Lounge is an online promotions, distribution and feedback platform that serves professional producers, DJ's, record labels, radio stations, emerging talent and unreleased tracks.

Musik Lounge was founded in 2009 by Tim Waugh, formerly General Manager of Home Nightclub in Sydney from 2000 to 2003 and Erick Morillo's Tour and Music Manager from 2006 to 2009. Musik Lounge has since expanded with offices in London, Sydney and Los Angeles.

http://www.musiklounge.net — Preceding unsigned comment added by Volkanc (talkcontribs) 02:41, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Plight of User:Qwyrxian

In light of this[1], where you chose to comment, I wish to address you directly to state: I meant in its essence what I said when I awarded Q. the barnstar. And I am sorry he didn't see it that way. This seemed like a good way to thank him for his help thus far. If I was remiss in the way I thanked him, I am truly sorry. Therefore there was no need to run to Q.'s 'defence' and no need to try to make me feel worse than I already do. As to Q., I sense he may be in pain in his private life, or something to that effect, and I can understand his loss of temper. I lose mine frequently.—Djathinkimacowboy 12:43, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your statements: "...good way to thank him for his help..." and "...no need to try to make me feel worse than I already do..." seem disingenuous and loaded to the nines.
Speculating on Q, the person, with "...he may be in pain in his private life..." is utterly inappropriate.
I strongly suggest that you comment on edits, not editors, and also that you read more discussions to better familiarize yourself with protocol and mode of conduct used here at WMF.
Now, as they said to each other in England 200 years ago: Good day to you, sir! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:11, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Einstein said, "Against stupidity, there is no argument." Choose to interpret it any way you like. It isn't the first time I have been deliberately accused in a false manner, which is what you are now doing. At least Q. didn't do that. You strike me as trouble. At the least, do me the favour of keeping out of my contacts with Q.—Djathinkimacowboy 13:23, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I interpret that edit as calling me stupid. I see a pattern in your edits of veiled insults with the pretense of earnestness and good faith. I don't buy it, and it doesn't take a genius to see it.
I will comment at Q's talk where I feel appropriate, unless Q objects, which he indeed may, with no offence taken by me. He doesn't play favourites. He is just about the most objective and neutral editor I know.
I would like to drop this. I prefer to edit in the mainspace. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:36, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AHEM--my take on this is you are quite the nasty hypocrite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.21.156.196 (talk) 14:33, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add it to my list. Just in the past week I've also been called:
hypocalcemia, hypocalcemias, hypocalcemic, hypocaust, hypocausts, hypocenter, hypocenters, hypocentral, hypochlorite, hypochlorites, hypochondria, hypochondriac, hypochondriacal, hypochondriacally, hypochondriacs, hypochondrias, hypochondriases, hypochondriasis, hypocorism, hypocorisms, hypocoristic, hypocoristical, hypocoristically, hypocotyl, hypocotyls, hypocrisies, hypocrisy, hypocrites, hypocritical, hypocritically, hypocycloid, and hypocycloids.
So thanks. That sort of fills in the missing one. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:44, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I doubt it was "missing". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.21.105.240 (talk) 14:56, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you don't stop socking, your 1 month block will get extended to indefinite. Just take a break, and come back sans drama and BS. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:03, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just asked for indefblock because Penispedia is a fetid swamp full of bullies. Children. Now I can tell you what I really think. You are an interfering, mouthy, nosey troublemaker. None of this is either here or there. You're the one who has to look in the mirror each day. Editors like you are beyond anyone's pity. Sticking your nose in at Q's page. Accusing me of being a sock. You really are stupid if you thought my earlier quote was accusing you of stupidity. Your actions are stupid. I guess you yourself are, too.

Botany status

Please see Talk:Botany#Where_to_go_now. Thank you. 512bits (talk) 15:55, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]