User talk:Bilinski: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
re; |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
SoLando's instructions in connection with his attempt to white out dark points of history are not welcomed here. Warn somebody else. |
SoLando's instructions in connection with his attempt to white out dark points of history are not welcomed here. Warn somebody else. |
||
==Your additions== |
|||
:Please refrain from engaging in [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]] and remain [[WP:CIVIL|civil]]. No one is attempting to "white out" history and if that is your riposte to requests for the verification of potentially controversial, non-neutrally written additions, progress will not be achieved. Concepts of truth are arguably subjective and the word has a tendency to be hijacked by those promoting a personal agenda so often resorted to when challenged or not embraced by fellow editors on Wikipedia. Asserting that what you write is true doesn't legitimise your additions to the article [[Menachem Begin]], nor does accusing other editors of engaging in a campaign of censure. All additions to Wikipedia must be [[WP:V|verifiable]] and attributed to [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and written in an encyclopedic and [[WP:NPOV|neutral]] formulation. Being a [[WP:SOAP|soapbox]] isn't Wikipedia's raison d'etre. We must leave our personal emotions and political adherence at the door and respect the primacy of neutrality and verifiability. Regards, [[User:SoLando|SoLando]] ([[User talk:SoLando|Talk]]) 10:29, 26 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:29, 26 March 2008
SoLando's instructions in connection with his attempt to white out dark points of history are not welcomed here. Warn somebody else.
Your additions
- Please refrain from engaging in personal attacks and remain civil. No one is attempting to "white out" history and if that is your riposte to requests for the verification of potentially controversial, non-neutrally written additions, progress will not be achieved. Concepts of truth are arguably subjective and the word has a tendency to be hijacked by those promoting a personal agenda so often resorted to when challenged or not embraced by fellow editors on Wikipedia. Asserting that what you write is true doesn't legitimise your additions to the article Menachem Begin, nor does accusing other editors of engaging in a campaign of censure. All additions to Wikipedia must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources and written in an encyclopedic and neutral formulation. Being a soapbox isn't Wikipedia's raison d'etre. We must leave our personal emotions and political adherence at the door and respect the primacy of neutrality and verifiability. Regards, SoLando (Talk) 10:29, 26 March 2008 (UTC)