User talk:BobMifune: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
BobMifune (talk | contribs)
remove untrue assertions. Take it somewhere else.
reverting the message that was removed
Line 10: Line 10:


:Actually, no. Brock is a former light of the conservative movement, and knows whereof he speaks. The frustration exhibited by conservatives over the success of MMFA is understandable, but that doesn't diminish MMFA's reputation as a fair, balanced, and ''reliable'' source. --[[User:BobMifune|BobMifune]] ([[User talk:BobMifune#top|talk]]) 02:27, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
:Actually, no. Brock is a former light of the conservative movement, and knows whereof he speaks. The frustration exhibited by conservatives over the success of MMFA is understandable, but that doesn't diminish MMFA's reputation as a fair, balanced, and ''reliable'' source. --[[User:BobMifune|BobMifune]] ([[User talk:BobMifune#top|talk]]) 02:27, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

::Actually yes, and it clearly says so on their [[Media Matters for America|article]] and their own web site. To say otherwise is preposterous on its face. Brock is a '''''former''''' light of the conservative movement who has clearly gone to the other side. MMfA is '''clearly''' liberal. - [[User:Realkyhick|Realkyhick]] <small>([[User talk:Realkyhick|Talk to me]])</small> 04:04, 6 October 2009 (UTC)


== Both of you blocked for 24 hr for 7 reverts on [[Mark Levin]] ==
== Both of you blocked for 24 hr for 7 reverts on [[Mark Levin]] ==

Revision as of 05:48, 6 October 2009

Re: Levin Page

Thanks Bob. If you could refer me on information about how to create a user account that's something I'd like to do. Also, I am planning on replacing the section, but I'm in the process of reworking it first to address some of the constructive criticism that was offered on the discussion page.

Update: please ignore the above message. I was able to find info on creating a user account and have now done so.BigTex71 (talk) 03:40, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Media Matters for America

Your comment on the Levin talk page about MMFA being "fair and balanced" might strike many people as being rather humorous, to say the least. Indeed, MMFA itself claims to be a watchdog for "conservative misinformation," as founder David Brock calls it. That's hardly NPOV, anymore than the conservative counterparts such as Accuracy in Media are. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 01:21, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, no. Brock is a former light of the conservative movement, and knows whereof he speaks. The frustration exhibited by conservatives over the success of MMFA is understandable, but that doesn't diminish MMFA's reputation as a fair, balanced, and reliable source. --BobMifune (talk) 02:27, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Actually yes, and it clearly says so on their article and their own web site. To say otherwise is preposterous on its face. Brock is a former light of the conservative movement who has clearly gone to the other side. MMfA is clearly liberal. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:04, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Both of you blocked for 24 hr for 7 reverts on Mark Levin

Our policy on edit warring - WP:EDITWAR and WP:3RR explicitly prohibit this type of behavior.

This was not acceptable on either of your parts. Both your accounts are blocked for 24 hrs.

Please discuss on talk pages and avoid fighting content back and forth on article pages in the future, when the block expires.

Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 03:29, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]