User talk:C.Fred: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Ion.sotiropoulos - ""
No edit summary
Line 51: Line 51:


Hello, you recently deleted with the argument of non-notability an article on a launched philosophical organization called [[Apeiron Centre]]. How is it possible for a new and innovative organization, which by definition is non-evident and non-notable, to have access to the wikipedia ? May you please reconsider your decision and restore the deleted article ? Thank You. Ion <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ion.sotiropoulos|Ion.sotiropoulos]] ([[User talk:Ion.sotiropoulos|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ion.sotiropoulos|contribs]]) 12:44, 29 December 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Hello, you recently deleted with the argument of non-notability an article on a launched philosophical organization called [[Apeiron Centre]]. How is it possible for a new and innovative organization, which by definition is non-evident and non-notable, to have access to the wikipedia ? May you please reconsider your decision and restore the deleted article ? Thank You. Ion <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ion.sotiropoulos|Ion.sotiropoulos]] ([[User talk:Ion.sotiropoulos|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ion.sotiropoulos|contribs]]) 12:44, 29 December 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== I am an Administrator too ==

I am an administrator but it won't let me acess the "delete" page. How do I get it to let me acess it?

Revision as of 03:48, 31 December 2008

Please add new threads to the bottom of the page. I will reply to your talk page unless you request otherwise. I may reply to your talk page and copy my response here to preserve a thread or note that the issue has been dealt with.

Note that all threads older than 7 days will be archived. Please sign and date your comment (by adding ~~~~ at the end) to assist the bot that archives this page.

Uncivil comments may be deleted summarily.


List of television stations in North America by media market

Thank you! I don't know if my instant reverts were right or not, with the OTRS ticket, I know we can't have Nielsen information. Could I have handled that situation differently? - NeutralHomerTalk • November 20, 2008 @ 12:44

Thanks....I will participate in the discussion and will try to stay away from problems like these in the future. One problem I do have. About 10 minutes ago, the little orange bar popped up and I thought I recieved a message from Pedro. This was what I seen. Not the history part, just the diff. Had I seen it from the history point-of-view, I would have know it wasn't actually from Pedro. Pedro had placed the same warning on Theaveng's talk page a couple moments earlier. I am not sure if there is something that can be said about not trying to "impersonate" another user, but it should. I will be more careful before editing to someone (as I sent a message to Pedro before realizing what was going on). - NeutralHomerTalk • November 20, 2008 @ 13:03

Amalgam Digital

I am not sure if I am doing this correctly, but I am requesting the page for Amalgam Digital be reopened for editing. It was deleted, but I would like to add references and edit the entry to take out any sort of blatant self advertising. Please instruct. Nancedw (talk) 23:17, 21 December 2008 (UTC)12/21/2208[reply]

Thank You, I will attempt to do so. I'm very new at this, so how will I have this reviewed by appropriate editors?

Nancedw (talk) 03:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC) 12/21/208[reply]

Holophyly

Are you going to be consistent and revert Consists=Mats Envall's edits of Holophyly too?? Plantsurfer (talk) 20:24, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Best wishes for the holiday season

Hi C.Fred. You deleted this article, yet this this this this and this would suggest that this is not an uncontroversial deletion. Also, having a notable member and having a notable band cover one of their songs are reasonable assertions of importance, in my view – at least to avoid a speedy. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 05:44, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apeiron Centre

Hello, you recently deleted with the argument of non-notability an article on a launched philosophical organization called Apeiron Centre. How is it possible for a new and innovative organization, which by definition is non-evident and non-notable, to have access to the wikipedia ? May you please reconsider your decision and restore the deleted article ? Thank You. Ion —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ion.sotiropoulos (talkcontribs) 12:44, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am an Administrator too

I am an administrator but it won't let me acess the "delete" page. How do I get it to let me acess it?