User talk:AnmaFinotera: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Dating comment by AlmeidaManga - "??????"
Line 61: Line 61:
==A serious question==
==A serious question==
You obviously enjoy being ''as nasty as you possibly can'' be in "acceptable" ways that don't threaten to get you blocked. My question is don't you ever get tired of being dead wrong about so many things, so often, in such a needlessly nasty manner, and so publicly in front of your fellow editors? Vandals suck. Eight year olds with access to the internet suck too. But it's people like you who maintain a facade of respectability while being absolutely horrible to other people who are really the worst members of the Wikipedia community. - [[User:AlmeidaManga|AlmeidaManga]] ([[User talk:AlmeidaManga|talk]]) <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|comment]] was added at 20:25, 9 July 2008 (UTC)</small><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
You obviously enjoy being ''as nasty as you possibly can'' be in "acceptable" ways that don't threaten to get you blocked. My question is don't you ever get tired of being dead wrong about so many things, so often, in such a needlessly nasty manner, and so publicly in front of your fellow editors? Vandals suck. Eight year olds with access to the internet suck too. But it's people like you who maintain a facade of respectability while being absolutely horrible to other people who are really the worst members of the Wikipedia community. - [[User:AlmeidaManga|AlmeidaManga]] ([[User talk:AlmeidaManga|talk]]) <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|comment]] was added at 20:25, 9 July 2008 (UTC)</small><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
*Almedia, I empathize with your sentiment but your comments are completely against the rules of [[W:civility|civility]]. Two wrongs don't make a right! Please take the high ground. - [[User:HouseOfScandal|House of Scandal]] ([[User talk:HouseOfScandal|talk]]) 20:27, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:27, 9 July 2008

I prefer to reply to comments on the page they were left, so if I left a comment on your page, reply there it is on my watch list. If you leave a comment here, watch this page until the discussion is done as I will only leave replies here. Comments which I find to be uncivil, full of vulgarities, an attempt flame baiting, or that are are excessively rude may be deleted without response. Comments from harassing editors or wikistalkers will also be summarily removed without response. If I choose not to answer, that's my right, don't keep putting it back. I'll just delete and get annoyed at you.

Are you here about an edit I made? You may want to check my user page first to get some general info on some common questions about edits I make. Here are some quick links as well:

The Hustler (film)

In the absence of a copywriter to review the article, is the article as it now stands eligible in your estimation for listing as GA? Otto4711 (talk) 01:34, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't mean to be a pest, but i'd like to move this nom forward. If the improvements to the article since your comments are sufficient I'd appreciate if you'd promote it. If not, specific feedback as to the current issues would be greatly appreciated. Otto4711 (talk) 01:46, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It still needs to be copyeditor. One has said he would review the article. I'll give him a poke. Prose is a GA criteria, so I can not, in good conscious, promote it without a CE.-- [[::User:Collectonian|Collectonian]] ([[::User talk:Collectonian|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Collectonian|contribs]]) 01:56, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Well, it seems I've pissed off the copy editor over proper punctuation placement. Hope that isn't going to be a problem. Otto4711 (talk) 01:22, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually, you pissed off two two of them, and as it is unlikely anyone else is going to be willing to CE it at this point, I have failed the article. Please have the article copyedited for the prose issues before renominating. -- [[::User:Collectonian|Collectonian]] ([[::User talk:Collectonian|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Collectonian|contribs]]) 01:30, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Question

Do you think it would be reasonable to use the DiC promotional video itself as a reference, without linking to a website that violates its copyright? Or would that run into verifiability issues? It doesn't seem like it should, since the thing is pretty easy to find if one wants to, but I'm not sure. --Masamage 19:42, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Was the video included in any of the DVD releases (can't remember at the moment)? -- [[::User:Collectonian|Collectonian]] ([[::User talk:Collectonian|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Collectonian|contribs]]) 19:50, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
It's pretty embarrassing, so I'd expect not; I don't personally own any of the DVD sets to check, though. Actually, I'm not sure where the denizens of the internet found it. I guess we could ask around. --Masamage 21:00, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It has to be available somewhere, since I believe it was never aired, right? -- [[::User:Collectonian|Collectonian]] ([[::User talk:Collectonian|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Collectonian|contribs]]) 23:58, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Re-version

Re-version has been speedily deleted due to apparent copyright infringement. This is not the case. It seems the the apparent copyright infringement is caused by a site using the text from WP rather than the other way around. Can you reverse the deletion? Ta. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 05:47, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an administrator so I can not undelete anything. User:Karanacs was the deleting admin. You would need to ask him to reevaluate the deleted article. -- [[::User:Collectonian|Collectonian]] ([[::User talk:Collectonian|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Collectonian|contribs]]) 06:01, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Removal of Speedy Deletion Tags

I notice that on the edit summary fot this page - Alex Perelson - you revert someone else removing a speedy tag on the grounds they are not an admin. I suggest you look here - [1] where it says "Anyone except a page's creator may contest the speedy deletion of a page by removing the deletion notice from the page". I'm not having a go because admins normally remove them so you may not realise anyone can but hopefully by telling you you can avoid future edit wars. I've not looked into the stalking bit and nor do I intend to. FYI, I'm not an admin, jsut trying to be friendly. Dpmuk (talk) 11:07, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They really should fix the box to change that then, though I don't think CSDs should be removable by anyone by an admin. -- [[::User:Collectonian|Collectonian]] ([[::User talk:Collectonian|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Collectonian|contribs]]) 14:13, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Blue Dragon

I heard a Blue Dragon wiki was starting. If you'd like, you can contribute information there. Rtkat3 (talk) 9:18, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, but no. I have no interest in contributing to other wikis. -- [[::User:Collectonian|Collectonian]] ([[::User talk:Collectonian|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Collectonian|contribs]]) 13:51, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

A serious question

You obviously enjoy being as nasty as you possibly can be in "acceptable" ways that don't threaten to get you blocked. My question is don't you ever get tired of being dead wrong about so many things, so often, in such a needlessly nasty manner, and so publicly in front of your fellow editors? Vandals suck. Eight year olds with access to the internet suck too. But it's people like you who maintain a facade of respectability while being absolutely horrible to other people who are really the worst members of the Wikipedia community. - AlmeidaManga (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 20:25, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Almedia, I empathize with your sentiment but your comments are completely against the rules of civility. Two wrongs don't make a right! Please take the high ground. - House of Scandal (talk) 20:27, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]