User talk:Courcelles

RfB

Forgive me for spamming your talk page again, but I wanted to say that I wasn't quite satisfied with the first time you declined my offer for you to run a RfB. As you said yourself, redundancy is good. You are one of the admins who would be best fit for being a bureaucrat, in my opinion, especially when I consider that you're probably the person who replied to the most RfAs in the past year and you're also the administrator with the most rights changes, according to the admin action statistics. If Maxim and Hersfold did it, why not you? ;) — Waterfox ^~talk~ 01:11, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

...I think a no is a no? There's more to consider than just "you tick the right boxes". sonia♫ 01:45, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Yes, I know that there's more to it than that. I have seen Courcelles' responses to RfAs, and he takes in consideration not only his own thinking, but also that of the others. He doesn't take !voting lightly and his answers are always of the most comprehensive and sophisticated. I often find myself agreeing with said !votes, more than those of anybody else. Courcelles understands that there's more to !voting than just S/O/N alignment, and that's a quality which is looked for in a bureaucrat. — Waterfox ^~talk~ 02:29, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

I'll consider it... Courcelles 08:22, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

A new "Kim Lee" page is needed

Greetings. You recently deleted the page for "Kim Lee", since it was indeed about a specific person who does not meet the notability criterion. However, the page needs to be up again but strictly as a REDIRECT to the Kim Lee (disambiguation) page. The reason is there are numerous persons with that or a similar name, with many of them notable enough to have their biographies in Wikipedia. I already submitted here a request to UNDELETE.-The Gnome (talk) 10:40, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Hmm, good idea. I moved the disambiguation page over, no undeletion is required in this case, as the only history that matters is the one at the disambiguation title, which was moved as well. Courcelles 18:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Yao Ming on ITN?

Can you explain to me how Yao Ming's retirement is worthy of inclusion on the ITN template? He's not one of the all-time greats, and surely there's more important news going on right now in the world? – PeeJay 13:53, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

At the time it went up, there was a consensus at WP:ITN/C that it merited inclusion in the section. If there is no longer such a consensus, (and I haven't looked today), someone will remove it. Courcelles 18:11, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

About a deleted page

Dear Courcelles

You have achieved the deletion of a page. If I have new arguments against your decision, may I discuss that with you, or should I proceed in an other way?

thanks --Amintib (talk) 16:16, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Please discuss them here, and please mention which page you are talking about. (Your account has no deleted edits, or edits to an AFD that ended in delete, so I have little idea what you are discussing at his moment.) Courcelles 17:21, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

You disrespect me, a dolt!

You failed to read my information that you supposed to place the information in my comment area, not under photographes gallery so I am deleting your information without reading your information. I don't cooperate with wikipedians who disrespected my information as "I also delete messages without reading them if they are not in comment space. I will not read messages if they are under photographes space, userboxes space, or Cculber007 profile." I am removing the information off without reading so I don't read yours. I split on disrespectful and rude wikipedians. If you repost same under my photography gallery again then I will continue removing until you read my information and put information in right place. Culby (talk) 03:30, 24 July 2011 (UTC)