User talk:Editor75439: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:09, 2 December 2011

November 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Somatotype and constitutional psychology, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Most of the material you introduced was not in the original text or was from a self-published source. Allens (talk) 21:23, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Somatotype and constitutional psychology. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Allens (talk) 05:32, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring

Your recent editing history at Somatotype and constitutional psychology shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. MastCell ^Talk 20:00, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please be aware that articles dealing with the intersection of race/ethnicity and human ability have been subject to long-term agenda-driven inappropriate editing. As such, they are subject to discretionary sanctions, meaning that editors who aren't willing or able to follow this site's policies may be blocked or banned from editing the topic. The details of the discretionary sanctions are here.

I think both of the articles you've focused on - William Herbert Sheldon and somatotype and constitutional psychology - fall under the purview of these discretionary sanctions. It's probably only fair to also let you know that I'm concerned that your editing is disruptive, as you're edit-warring, removing quality sources, and attacking other editors, and if those behaviors continue, I will probably ask an uninvolved admin to consider invoking the discretionary sanctions against this account. MastCell ^Talk 20:09, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 20:00, 2 December 2011 edit MastCell (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Administrators 43,150 edits →‎Edit-warring: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:09, 2 December 2011 edit undo MastCell (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Administrators 43,150 edits →‎Edit-warring: notice of discretionary sanctions Next edit →
Line 10:		Line 10:

	If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's [[WP:TALK\|talk page]] to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus\|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards\|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution\|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy\|page protection]]. You may still be blocked for [[WP:EDITWAR\|edit warring]] even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> '''[[User:MastCell\|MastCell]]''' <sup>[[User Talk:MastCell\|Talk]]</sup> 20:00, 2 December 2011 (UTC)		If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's [[WP:TALK\|talk page]] to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus\|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards\|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution\|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy\|page protection]]. You may still be blocked for [[WP:EDITWAR\|edit warring]] even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> '''[[User:MastCell\|MastCell]]''' <sup>[[User Talk:MastCell\|Talk]]</sup> 20:00, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
			:Also, please be aware that articles dealing with the intersection of race/ethnicity and human ability have been subject to long-term [[WP:ADVOCACY\|agenda-driven]] inappropriate editing. As such, they are subject to discretionary sanctions, meaning that editors who aren't willing or able to follow this site's policies may be blocked or banned from editing the topic. The details of the discretionary sanctions are [[Wikipedia:ARBR%26I#Editors_reminded_and_discretionary_sanctions\|here]].<p>I think both of the articles you've focused on - [[William Herbert Sheldon]] and [[somatotype and constitutional psychology]] - fall under the purview of these discretionary sanctions. It's probably only fair to also let you know that I'm concerned that your editing is disruptive, as you're edit-warring, removing quality sources, and [[WP:NPA\|attacking other editors]], and if those behaviors continue, I will probably ask an uninvolved admin to consider invoking the discretionary sanctions against this account. '''[[User:MastCell\|MastCell]]''' <sup>[[User Talk:MastCell\|Talk]]</sup> 20:09, 2 December 2011 (UTC)