User talk:Giambs0099

hey man, thanks for spreading the word..outstanding work

Speedy deletion of Giambracy

A tag has been placed on Giambracy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MLauba (talk) 13:33, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

The article was pre-maturely posted, we are working around the clock to update its sources, and improve its detail and validity, thank you for your patience and understanding of a very important subject to us.

Proposed deletion of Giambracy

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Giambracy, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Fan club / religious movement with exactly 0 non-wiki ghits and 0 gnews hits. WP:NFT probably applies here.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:40, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Once again I apologize folks, Bob Jenkins over there in IT was running through some systematic tests, and somehow posted a portion of "Giambracy" onto Wikipedia. Our staff is currently addressing the issue, and realize if our Wikipedia article is not complete to your very exceptional standards it will be no longer available. Please bear with us, as we finish off some formalities, and give Bob over there a kick in the britches for his slip up that has caused one hell of a doozy over here. (Look for Giambracy/Giambigarchy in upcoming magazines, news, and current events)

Bob Jenkins has confirmed he will work overtime remotely from his home this weekend to address the outstanding issues. Further apologies.

I've been informed that your administrative notations have been accidently removed from the article. This was done while updating the article's content and sources, we apologize for any inconvenience or brass against your policies. Much abliged.

AfD nomination of Giambracy

I have nominated Giambracy, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giambracy. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fabrictramp | talk to me 19:23, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

"FabricTramp", your diligence and professionalism is to be comended. I would very much like a worker like you on my staff. Keep up the great work! We still don't know how it was released pre-maturely, but the arrival of Giambracy has been, well...pre-mature. It did not have a release date until next week, where it will use public means as a way to inform people about the benefits and extremely positive way of life/structure it can provide. The web launch has been a result of topographical error, and is being determined, and de-bugged as we speak. If at all possible I would like to by you a beer. However, I know this is not possible, but I'm just extending my giambigarchy arm to lend you a praise of gratitude.

HEY PMDrive1061...you want a piece a me you little dickweed. You think you can stop us. Wherever you are, wherever you will be...We of the Giambigarchy will be lurking in the shadows of our mustaches. I am calling you out as a number one enemy of the greatest movement that has ever walked the face of this earth. We are continually growing in numbers and our message will be heard loud and clear, and you will not succeed in opressing us. I for one have my eye/upper lip fur on you and some of your other administrator butt buddies. You have done nothing but brought this on yourself, it all could have been easily avoided. Only when you start acting like a complete douche all the time and abusing your privelages (which on the grand scale of things are utterly minimal), then you will be an object to extinguish. We of the Giambigarchy think you are non-sense and really should re think your inks. Giambigarchy outGiambs0099 (talk) 15:24, 10 April 2009 (UTC)