User talk:Goldblooded

Galland

Can you please not change information arbitrarily particularly when your edit summary suggests a guess and a question? Galland was employed by the Argentine Government as a civilian. He was never a member of the Argentine Air Force. His and title award was honorary. Dapi89 (talk) 13:10, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Andre Beaufre.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Andre Beaufre.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —GFOLEY FOUR— 16:28, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia from Reaper Eternal

Hi, Goldblooded. I welcome you to Wikipedia! Thank you for all of your edits. I hope you like editing here and being part of Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); when you save the page, this will turn into your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or put {{helpme}} (and what you need help with) on your talk page and someone will show up very soon to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:47, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Well yes i have been on here for a few months, If you are reffering to on Gfoely4' s page then that was just a mistake. Sorry.

Goldblooded (talk) 16:53, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Buggie111 discusses neutral point of view

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:30, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors – Contest results, A-class medal recipients Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Editorial: Hawkeye's thoughts on the article writing process

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:52, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:43, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Last occurrences

I really liked it and would love to see it back. However, I don't want to rewrite it from scratch, and I don't want to work on it just to have it deleted again. What's your plan? Czolgolz (talk) 23:44, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Siegfried Marseille

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Siegfried Marseille requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Inks.LWC (talk) 21:48, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gordon Waterfield

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gordon Waterfield requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Reichsfürst (talk) 22:47, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Page deletion - response

Please don't be offended by the tagging - I left it half an hour to establish notability but the page only says 'Gordon Waterfield is a notable British Journalist and broadcaster, He was interviewed in the World at War in the episode France Falls When he was a War corespondent on the Rhine during the Phoney war. He also written a great deal of books,' - which neither establishes notabiltiy nor is indicative of the fact that any could be found. The phrase 'is notable because' highlights this. Please see wp:notability. (talk) 23:08, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Well what do you want me to do to improve it? Goldblooded (talk) 23:25, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

You have asked me on my talk page why I have deleted this article. I have little to add beyond the comments made by Reichsfürst. An interview in a TV series does not confer notability, and stating that he has written a number of books, unspecified, similarly fails to do so. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:32, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Being an author does not automatically confer notability; nor does being a war correspondent. But if you really feel that this gentleman should have an article, and if you feel that it can be expanded to indicate wikipedic notability let me know and I will restore it. Or, alternatively, you can go to WP:DRV and ask the view of the community. In my opinion the article, as it stood, failed WP:NN. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 10:41, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Not quite; what I am saying is give us something that differentiates him fom all the other correspondents and authors. More refs would be good. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 17:23, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Christabel Bielenberg, the article with which you ask me to compare your article, contains a great deal of relevant detail. Your article is 43 words long, without any detail at all. There is a difference; I have already alluded to your two valid options; arguing about the situation as it stands will not help you. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 15:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Siegfried Marseille for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siegfried Marseille is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siegfried Marseille until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Inks.LWC (talk) 00:52, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Barbarossa (Episode)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Barbarossa (Episode). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - The World at War. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at The World at War - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 13:26, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

World at War

I nominated the page because it does nothing to expand upon the information that was already present at The World at War and, as such, is nothing more than a repetition of information that has already been included. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 13:33, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Marseille Siegfried1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Marseille Siegfried1.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:07, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Siegmund Weltlinger

This article, which I see you have recently created and worked on, is very clearly vastly better than the one about which we have had discussion. I would, however, ask you to go back and re-read it, as some parts of the article do not make sense. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 15:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Marseille Siegfried1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Marseille Siegfried1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:14, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

You need to provide an indication of how the image is licensed. Is it Public Domain for example? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:00, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Marseille Siegfried1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Marseille Siegfried1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:50, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Siegfried Marseille

1. Because whether or not the article gets deleted the facts must be correct.
2. I am curious if you manage to find information that I couldn't. I researched Hans-Joachim Marseille's life for 15 years now, travelling to Africa and Berlin, visiting the German achives in Kornelimünster and Freiburg, I even once spoke to Eduard Neumann before he died.

I truly wish you good luck with the article but I stick with my opinion that he is borderline with respect to the WP:SOLDIER criteria. MisterBee1966 (talk) 04:10, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Edits

Stop reverting my edits,

Of course its inevitable they are going to shoot down some of the german aircraft but i hope your not saying that a polish bi plane is better than German Luftwaffe which in 1939 was the most advanced air force in the world , It even said on the article. And you even said yourself they were more advanced, Ive rephrased the statement to satisfy you. But anyway;

Anymore and ill report you for vandalism. Goldblooded (talk) 18:22, 7 July 2011 (UTC) Who is the vandal? Just check out your own MO about who is the disruptive element here.

Trying to make the comparison to either the Junkers Ju-87, an attack aircraft to the PZL. P.11 is illogical. You are comparing two dissimilar types. If you want to make valid comparison, be ready to provide authoritative and valid reference sources. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 18:38, 7 July 2011 (UTC).