User talk:Hjc2012: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
comments from chat
Hjc2012 (talk | contribs)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Comments from Barry Cook conversation ==

Hi Hjc2012, I've posted notes from our conversation in the hope that they will be useful when you get round to making this article:

<salimfadhley> Oh, but there's nothing on that page. It's empty apart from the text "Barry Cook" hjc2012

<salimfadhley> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Barry_Cook

<salimfadhley> There's no point in moving that -- you could recreate it yourself in sandbox in 1 minute.

<hjc2012> how

<salimfadhley> By the way, to get to your sandbox just click the link at the top of the screen that says "My Sandbox"

<hjc2012> ok

<salimfadhley> You can write what you want there.

<hjc2012> ok

<salimfadhley> With a few notable exceptions, Sandbox content is generally not checked-over unless you invite others to check it out.

<hjc2012> but notable website links are no good? you only want newspapers?

<salimfadhley> Well, I assume that there are specialist journals for martial-arts

<hjc2012> thats very limiting

<salimfadhley> Newspaper websites are better than newspapers because they are easier to verify

<salimfadhley> So we always prefer online links

<salimfadhley> In general we look for reputable publishers.

<salimfadhley> Or reputable publications.

<hjc2012> http://www.worldwidedojo.com/entertainment/cook-barry/

<salimfadhley> So an article in the Independent would be taken more seriously than an article in the Sunday Sport

<hjc2012> http://www.fightcon.com/video/Barry-Cook-Showreel/40452867c812cf47c68879ee2aa75650

<salimfadhley> It's hard to say whether that site counts as a reliable secondary source.

<hjc2012> http://www.cheongye.co.uk/instructor.html

<hjc2012> http://www.grapplezone.co.uk/instructor.html

<salimfadhley> The first looks like a blog, but I'm not familiar enough with the field to know for sure (worldwidedojo)

<salimfadhley> The second is just a video, and therefore unsuitable for anything.

<hjc2012> http://barryjcook.co.uk/

<hjc2012> a video

<hjc2012> no click underneath

<salimfadhley> Chegoyne appears to be not a news-source. Seems to be a sporting association's bio so not neutral.

<hjc2012> the first is the main company all movie directors use to source martial artists for movies lol wow

<salimfadhley> Grapplezone appears to be a blog of some kind, in any case does not appear to be what we'd normally consider a reliable secondary source.

<hjc2012> never mind it seems like your fighting to not have articles

<salimfadhley> hjc2012: In that case it's definitely not a neutral source. If it's a company which sources martial artists then it's not likely to be accepted.

* hjc2012 has quit (Quit: Page closed)

Revision as of 10:38, 8 June 2012