User talk:John Bahrain: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 43: Line 43:
Please check the diskussion page of Skype , security issues German wire tapping!
Please check the diskussion page of Skype , security issues German wire tapping!
I'm just a passer by, from Germany, so I could read that original paper, but my enlish is no good enogh to correct the article... maybe You like to...--[[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 21:50, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
I'm just a passer by, from Germany, so I could read that original paper, but my enlish is no good enogh to correct the article... maybe You like to...--[[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 21:50, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

== Stop Disruptive Edits ==
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia{{#if:|, as you did to [[:{{{1}}}]]}}. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 -->

Revision as of 04:54, 11 October 2008

Welcome! Hello, John Bahrain, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Katr67 (talk) 04:45, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Barnstar and keep up the good work on this article. All the best,SelfEvidentTruths (talk) 04:41, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is a great start, but ... can you find any arguments con? Bearian (talk) 19:25, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

O.K., I placed a senetence about "subject to much controversy, including both praise and criticism" in the lede. Bearian (talk) 19:40, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Every sentence is now cited. Looks good to me. Sorry for the bother. Bearian (talk) 19:50, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This submission at DYK has been queried at the DYK suggestions page. You will need to respond before the article can be promoted, thanks. Gatoclass (talk) 04:42, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Updated DYK query On 30 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article disinvestment from Israel, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Gatoclass (talk) 08:19, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blockage/Blockade of the Gaza Strip

Hi, John. I wanted to let you know that for non-controversial moves like the one you requested at WP:RM, you can simply list them under the Uncontroversial proposals section, as they don't require any discussion. That way, you can ensure that those who monitor the requested moves page can more quickly fix the issue with the title. I've moved the page to the correct location, but I just wanted to let you know for future use. Regards, Parsecboy (talk) 02:26, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Palestinian sanctions articles

I don't object to a separate article on the Gaza blockade, but I'm worried the new title for the original article may be misleading, as it implies the sanctions imposed in 2006 have ended. They have been eased, but Israel still has not returned all the withheld tax revenues. I'm not sure but I think the banking restrictions are still in effect, too. Sanguinalis (talk) 02:02, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I am not fully informed of the situation. Please change it back then. --John Bahrain (talk) 02:57, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I respect your judgement in removing the new section I inserted at HonestReporting. But (other than the "Controversy" title, which I'm unsure of) it seems to me that something of that kind definitely belongs in there. HR makes these claims as part of its regular activities (I see 9 articles they have attacking JH), but JH's position, at least in this case, is clear and defensible. There seems no point in an article that doesn't document what HR is doing. PRtalk 15:03, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the diskussion page of Skype , security issues German wire tapping! I'm just a passer by, from Germany, so I could read that original paper, but my enlish is no good enogh to correct the article... maybe You like to...--Manorainjan (talk) 21:50, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop Disruptive Edits

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.