User talk:John Vandenberg/Archive 11: Difference between revisions
→FYI: new section |
→FYI: sarcasm is really helpful |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#Intergovernmental_Panel_on_Climate_Change_.28edit.7Ctalk.7Chistory.7Clinks.7Cwatch.7Clogs.29 this]. Cheers, [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 17:07, 4 September 2010 (UTC) |
See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#Intergovernmental_Panel_on_Climate_Change_.28edit.7Ctalk.7Chistory.7Clinks.7Cwatch.7Clogs.29 this]. Cheers, [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 17:07, 4 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
I thought you'd like to know that there have been more than two reverts at [[Watts Up With That?]] so you should rush off and protect it immeadiately, following your new policy. Of course, *I* haven't edited it recently, so in that case you don't need to, following your unstated policy. If it would help, I could edit it too, then you could protect it. Would that make a decision easier for you? [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] ([[User talk:William M. Connolley|talk]]) 22:16, 4 September 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:16, 4 September 2010
If you are wondering about my reverts and/or deletions of contributions from banned users, please email me at jayvdbgmail.com, contact a Functionary that you know, or email the functionaries-en list.
This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:John_Vandenberg/Archive_11. |
|
1 - 2004 — July 7, 2007 |
FYI
See this. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 17:07, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
I thought you'd like to know that there have been more than two reverts at Watts Up With That? so you should rush off and protect it immeadiately, following your new policy. Of course, *I* haven't edited it recently, so in that case you don't need to, following your unstated policy. If it would help, I could edit it too, then you could protect it. Would that make a decision easier for you? William M. Connolley (talk) 22:16, 4 September 2010 (UTC)