User talk:Juliancolton: Difference between revisions

; Juliancolton's Archives
	March 2008 Archive; April 2008 Archive; May 2008 Archive; June 2008 Archive; July 2008 Archive; August 2008 Archive; September 2008 Archive; October 2008 Archive; November 2008 Archive; December 2008 Archive; January 2009 Archive; February 2009 Archive; March 2009 Archive; April 2009 Archive; May 2009 Archive; June 2009 Archive; July 2009 Archive; August 2009 Archive; September 2009 Archive; October 2009 Archive; November 2009 Archive;

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 22:48, 5 November 2009

This is Juliancolton's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38: 3 days

Please click here to leave me a new message.

Your project

Hi, I just want to take a second to say hi. When I come across an editor that I feel positively and effectively contributes to Wikipedia I try to monitor their contributions to try to improve myself as a Wikipedian. You are one of the handful that I keep an eye on and let me say that I was disappointed when you "left". I am glad that you are back and am anxious to see what becomes of your project. J04n(talk page) 14:59, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, thanks for the kind words. Hope I see you around the wiki! –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:42, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The project seems really great. Sorry about creating a subsection of non-members. I hate when people do stuff like that. Do as I say and not as I do. I went to remove it, but others have signed on. :) Oh well. My intention was to be a supporter without necessarily being a party to the enterprise. I want to have my cake and eat it too. Does this mean you're back? ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:25, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, yeah, I can understand that. I'm just surprised there's not an "anti-members" section yet...

I still intend to focus my work on other projects like Commons, but I guess I'm around for the time being. Cheers. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:42, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Julian ... is it ok with you if I create a sub-page /samples for some stuff in your project? Once we've got things organized and such, we can delete it - just sort of a scratchpad kind of thing. Cheers. — Ched : ? 19:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Be my guest; after all, it's a wiki! :) –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:23, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Messer

Hello, I am a journalist and I worked on an article re: Jonathan Messer Australian Film and Theatre Director. Can you please undelete it. he is very gifted, and I will edit it and make the 'red line' or whatever it is to his work removed. Thank you. Giselle. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.124.89.54 (talk) 15:41, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Restored by another sysop. Regards, 17:42, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Issues resolved!

Alright, I got my computer troubles sorted out soon after my last note - finally! So whenever you're ready, I'm ready. How does this Saturday sound for you? Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 15:45, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, that would be great. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:42, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks. :) Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 15:32, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pass on a request

Can you see this please. PS. I'm a big fan of the new user page. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 17:26, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I've just taken a look, and I'm not quite sure how to do that. What's the syntax for the template? –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:42, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's the same as the syntax in the request. Just put {{Location|41|52|53.27|N|88|1|59.44|W}} under the information box. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 18:27, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Allerseelen

could you restore this article? it can be restored directly into the main namespace, i believe, as it must have been deleted by user:east718 in error 2 years ago. the band is quite well-known; the article has 13 (currently broken) wikilinks, and an elaborate german-language counterpart [1]. thanks! --Ktotam (talk) 23:31, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that was two years ago, so the band may indeed have not been notable then. I suggest bringing this up at WP:DRV to see what others say. Regards, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:39, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since it was an uncontested prod, my understanding is that it's subject to automatic restoration and there's no need to take it to DRV. Tim Song (talk) 01:47, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, generally that's true, but I think if a deletion is a few years old it should be discussed first. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:48, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

what difference does it make if it's a few years or a few days? i would have contacted the admin who performed the deletion, but he's not active anymore --Ktotam (talk) 10:18, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just feel it's better to conduct a brief survey at DRV to see if others feel the subject has become adequately notable. You're free to solicit the advice of another sysop of course, but I wouldn't feel entirely comfortable restoring this without discussion. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:40, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

6,000th edit

6,000

December21st2012Freak hereby uses his 6,000th edit to leave a note on Juliancolton's talk page.

December21st2012Freak ^{Lord of the Vulcans} 00:45, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think you should really reconsider the deletion of the recon ron pull up program page. I've been searching around the internet and all the pages I find for recon ron have different numbers, reps. Wikipedia allowed for editing so people corrected it. I feel wikipedia was the only reliable source to find the correct amount of reps for recon ron. I could tell me simply looking at the numbers that the others were wrong. I have been using the recon ron wiki page for a very long time now and it's the reason why I can do 20+ pull ups now. I think everyone should have access to the help I did. Also, what harm can it do keeping it up? Whereas, it can do some good if it is up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.201.89.230 (talk) 06:33, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Admin coaching - the sequel

Hi Juliancolton, it's good to see that you're back!

I thought I'd leave it a couple of days before re-approaching you, but I thought I'd ask if you would still consider admin coaching me? I removed my name from your list at Wikipedia:Admin_coaching/Status, as I wasn't sure how long you'd be on break for! I approached Richardshusr (see User_talk:Richardshusr#Query_about_admin_coaching) as the only other possible coach at the moment, although I haven't heard from them.

If you do not have the time to coach me, that's fine - just let me know!

If you do agree to coach me, feel free to use User talk:Phantomsteve/Coaching for coaching-specific messages.

Regards, -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 16:19, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I'm still willing to coach you. I might not be as active as I was a few weeks ago, but I should be able to respond efficiently. Will get on it in due course. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:44, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll contact Richardshusr to withdraw my request! -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 20:59, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

G-Unit Records.

Thank you for locking the page. I would like to point out, however, that as the page currently is, is incorrect. "ThisIs50" is not a reliable source and the user that has been vandalizing the article also continues to use reliable sources incorrectly (please note The Game source from MTV mentions he was released). I just wanted to point these things out to you as an admin. Thank you. --H E L LØ ŦH E R E 19:06, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. You might want to bring that up on the talk page, as right now it wouldn't be appropriate to make any substantial edits. Cheers! –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:00, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for TOTSO

An editor has asked for a deletion review of TOTSO. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Tim Song (talk) 20:25, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My comments

My comments are not odd, nor is my account compromised. The comments I made on Malleus's and CoM's pages are direct responses to the ridiculous edits they made on MY Talk page. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 22:38, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, that's completely unacceptable. Please maintain a mature and professional demeanor when dealing with other users. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:42, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When are you going to make the same warning to CoM and Malleus for their edits on my Talk page? Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 22:48, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 127: / Line 127: @@
 My comments are not odd, nor is my account compromised.  The comments I made on Malleus's and CoM's pages are direct responses to the ridiculous edits they made on MY Talk page.  [[User:Who then was a gentleman?|Who then was a gentleman?]] ([[User talk:Who then was a gentleman?|talk]]) 22:38, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 :In that case, that's completely unacceptable. Please maintain a mature and professional demeanor when dealing with other users. –'''[[User:Juliancolton|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:#36648B">Juliancolton</span>]]'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[User_talk:Juliancolton|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:gray">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 22:42, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
+::When are you going to make the same warning to CoM and Malleus for their edits on my Talk page?  [[User:Who then was a gentleman?|Who then was a gentleman?]] ([[User talk:Who then was a gentleman?|talk]]) 22:48, 5 November 2009 (UTC)